Evaluation of the effect ofcomputer-aided classification ofbenign and malignant lesions onreader performance in automated three-dimensional breast ultrasound

Academic Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1381-1388

  Tan, Tao ^a   Platel, Bram ^b   Twellmann, Thorsten ^b   van Schie, Guido ^a   Mus, Roel ^a   Grivegnée, André ^c   Mann, Ritse M ^a   Karssemeijer, Nico ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b FRAUNHOFER MEVIS   (Germany)

^c JULES BORDET INSTITUTE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer assisted diagnosis; Image interpretation; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST CYST; BREAST FIBROADENOMA; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FIBROCYSTIC BREAST DISEASE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RESIDENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; ULTRASOUND TRANSDUCER; BREAST CANCER; COMPUTER-ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; IMAGE INTERPRETATION; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATHOLOGY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; ULTRASOUND;

BREAST CANCER; COMPUTER-ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION; ULTRASOUND;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84885336216     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: 18784046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2013.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Pisano E.D., Hendrick R.E., Yaffe M.J., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology 2008, 246:376-383.
2. Kelly K.M., Dean J., Comulada W.S., et al. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 2010, 20:734-742.
3. Berg W.A., Blume J.D., Cormack J.B., et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008, 299:2151-2163.
4. Schaefer F.K., Waldmann A., Katalinic A., et al. Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis-analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures. Eur J Radiol 2010, 20:1085-1092.
5. Rotten D., Levaillant J.M., Zerat L. Analysis of normal breast tissue and of solid breast masses using three-dimensional ultrasound mammography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1999, 14:114-124.
6. Watermann D.O., Földi M., Hanjalic-Beck A., et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound for the assessment of breast lesions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005, 25:592-598.
7. Taylor P., Potts H.W.W. Computer aids and human second reading as interventions in screening mammography: two systematic reviews to compare effects on cancer detection and recall rate. Eur J Cancer 2008, 44:798-807.
8. Horsch K., Giger M.L., Vyborny C.J., et al. Performance of computer-aided diagnosis in the interpretation of lesions on breast sonography. Acad Radiol 2004, 11:272-280.
9. Chang R.-F., Wu W.-J., Moon W.K., et al. Automatic ultrasound segmentation and morphology based diagnosis of solid breast tumors. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2005, 89:179-185.
10. Drukker K., Sennett C.A., Giger M.L. Automated method for improving system performance of computer-aided diagnosis in breast ultrasound. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2009, 28:122-128.
11. Moon W.K., Shen Y.-W., Huang C.-S., et al. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011, 37:539-548.
12. Tan T., Platel B., Huisman H., et al. Computer aided lesion diagnosis in automated 3D breast ultrasound using coronal spiculation. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012, 31:1034-1042.
13. Wang J., Engelmann R., Li Q. Segmentation of pulmonary nodules in three-dimensional CT images by use of a spiral-scanning technique. Med Phys 2007, 34:4678-4689.
14. Timp S., Karssemeijer N. A new 2D segmentation method based on dynamic programming applied to computer aided detection in mammography. Med Phys 2004, 31:958-971.
15. Karssemeijer N., Te Brake G.M. Detection of stellate distortions in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1996, 15:611-619.
16. Metz C.E., Herman B.A., Shen J.H. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 1998, 17:1033-1053.
17. Dorfman D.D., Berbaum K.S., Metz C.E. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers andpatients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992, 27:723-731.
18. Hillis S.L., Berbaum K.S., Metz C.E. Recent developments in the Dorfman-Berbaum-Metz procedure for multireader ROC study analysis. Acad Radiol 2008, 15:647-661.
19. Sahiner B., Chan H.-P., Roubidoux M.A., et al. Malignant and benign breast masses on 3D US volumetric images: effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 2007, 242:716-724.