Procedure volume influences adherence to celiac disease guidelines

European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volumn 25, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1273-1278

  Lebwohl, Benjamin ^a,b   Genta, Robert M ^d   Kapel, Robert C ^e   Sheehan, Daniel ^c   Lerner, Nina S ^c   Green, Peter H ^a   Neugut, Alfred I ^b   Rundle, Andrew ^b  

^a Department of Medicine   (United States)

^b Department of Medicine   (United States)

^c Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^d MIRACA LIFE SCIENCES   (United States)

^e DANBURY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

celiac disease; endoscopy; quality of healthcare

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CELIAC DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; DISEASE MODEL; DUODENUM BIOPSY; FEMALE; GASTROENTEROLOGIST; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PHYSICIAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX RATIO; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; AGED; BIOPSY; CELIAC DISEASE; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DUODENUM; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PUERTO RICO; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; WORKLOAD;

EID: 84885325486     PISSN: 0954691X     EISSN: 14735687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e3283643542     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Fasano A, Berti I, Gerarduzzi T, Not T, Colletti RB, Drago S, et al. Prevalence of celiac disease in at-risk and not-at-risk groups in the United States: a large multicenter study. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:286-292.
2. Rubio-Tapia A, Ludvigsson JF, Brantner TL, Murray JA, Everhart JE. The prevalence of celiac disease in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol 2012; 107:1538-1544.
3. Catassi C, Kryszak D, Bhatti B, Sturgeon C, Helzlsouer K, Clipp SL, et al. Natural history of celiac disease autoimmunity in a USA cohort followed since 1974. Ann Med 2010; 42:530-538.
4. Rubio-Tapia A, Kyle RA, Kaplan EL, Johnson DR, Page W, Erdtmann F, et al. Increased prevalence and mortality in undiagnosed celiac disease. Gastroenterology 2009; 137:88-93.
5. Katz KD, Rashtak S, Lahr BD, Melton LJ III, Krause PK, Maggi K, et al. Screening for celiac disease in a North American population: sequential serology and gastrointestinal symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106:1333-1339.
6. Green PHR, Stavropoulos SN, Panagi SG, Goldstein SL, Mcmahon DJ, Absan H, Neugut AI. Characteristics of adult celiac disease in the USA: results of a national survey. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96:126-131.
7. Rostom A, Murray JA, Kagnoff MF. American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute technical review on the diagnosis and management of celiac disease. Gastroenterology 2006; 131:1981-2002.
8. Pais WP, Duerksen DR, Pettigrew NM, Bernstein CN. How many duodenal biopsy specimens are required to make a diagnosis of celiac disease? Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67:1082-1087.
9. Lebwohl B, Kapel RC, Neugut AI, Green PH, Genta RM. Adherence to biopsy guidelines increases celiac disease diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74:103-109.
10. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS. Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2002.
11. Catassi C, Kryszak D, Louis-Jacques O, Duerksen DR, Hill I, Crowe SE, et al. Detection of celiac disease in primary care: a multicenter case-finding study in North America. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102:1454-1460.
12. Arguelles-Grande C, Tennyson CA, Lewis SK, Green PH, Bhagat G. Variability in small bowel histopathology reporting between different pathology practice settings: impact on the diagnosis of coeliac disease. J Clin Pathol 2012; 65:242-247.
13. Harewood GC, Holub JL, Lieberman DA. Variation in small bowel biopsy performance among diverse endoscopy settings: results from a national endoscopic database. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99:1790-1794.
14. Lebwohl B, Tennyson CA, Holub JL, Lieberman DA, Neugut AI, Green PH. Sex and racial disparities in duodenal biopsy to evaluate for celiac disease. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 76:779-785.
15. Murphy MM, Ng SC, Simons JP, Csikesz NG, Shah SA, Tseng JF. Predictors of major complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgeon, hospital, or patient? J Am Coll Surg 2010; 211:73-80.
16. Ho V, Heslin MJ. Effect of hospital volume and experience on in-hospital mortality for pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Surg 2003; 237:509-514.
17. Varadarajulu S, Kilgore ML, Wilcox CM, Eloubeidi MA. Relationship among hospital ERCP volume, length of stay, and technical outcomes. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64:338-347.
18. Harewood GC. Relationship of colonoscopy completion rates and endoscopist features. Dig Dis Sci 2005; 50:47-51.
19. Ko CW, Dominitz JA, Green P, KreuterW, Baldwin LM. Specialty differences in polyp detection, removal, and biopsy during colonoscopy. Am J Med 2010; 123:528-535.
20. Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Bhansali A, Yamanaka H, Neeman N, Sheth S, et al. Adenoma detection rates vary minimally with time of day and case rank: a prospective study of 2139 first screening colonoscopies. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:554-560.
21. Singh H, Nugent Z, Mahmud SM, Demers AA, Bernstein CN. Predictors of colorectal cancer after negative colonoscopy: a population-based study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105:663-673.
22. Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Saskin R. Endoscopist specialty is associated with incident colorectal cancer after a negative colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8:275-279.
23. Leonard C, Stordeur S, Roberfroid D. Association between physician density and health care consumption: a systematic review of the evidence. Health Policy 2009; 91:121-134.
24. Perrin JM, Homer CJ, Berwick DM, Woolf AD, Freeman JL, Wennberg JE. Variations in rates of hospitalization of children in three urban communities. N Engl J Med 1989; 320:1183-1187.
25. Ananthakrishnan AN, Hoffmann RG, Saeian K. Higher physician density is associated with lower incidence of late-stage colorectal cancer. J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25:1164-1171.
26. Ananthakrishnan AN, McGinley EL, Binion DG, Saeian K. Physician density and hospitalization for inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2011; 17:633-638.
27. Rogart JN, Siddiqui UD, Jamidar PA, Aslanian HR. Fellow involvement may increase adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103:2841-2846.
28. Rex DK, Hewett DG, Raghavendra M, Chalasani N. The impact of videorecording on the quality of colonoscopy performance: a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105:2312-2317.
29. Madhoun MF, Tierney WM. The impact of video recording colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75:127-133.
30. Dandalides SM, Carey WD, Petras R, Achkar E. Endoscopic small bowel mucosal biopsy: a controlled trial evaluating forceps size and biopsy location in the diagnosis of normal and abnormal mucosal architecture. Gastrointest Endosc 1989; 35:197-200.