Same-day LARC insertion attitudes and practices

Contraception

Volumn 88, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 629-635

  Biggs, M Antonia ^a   Arons, Abigail ^a   Turner, Rita ^b   Brindis, Claire D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Barriers to care; Colorado; Family planning; Iowa; Long acting reversible contraception; Low income; Professional guidelines; Women

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTRACEPTION; FAMILY PLANNING; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LONG ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION; UNITED STATES; UNPLANNED PREGNANCY;

BARRIERS TO CARE; COLORADO; FAMILY PLANNING; IOWA; LONG-ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTION; LOW INCOME; PROFESSIONAL GUIDELINES; WOMEN;

ABORTION, INDUCED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLORADO; CONTRACEPTION BEHAVIOR; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; DRUG IMPLANTS; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; IOWA; MALE; PHYSICIAN EXECUTIVES; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POVERTY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84885319012     PISSN: 00107824     EISSN: 18790518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allen RH, Goldberg AB, Grimes DA: Expanding access to intrauterine contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009, 201(5):456 e451-e455.
2. P.D. Blumenthal, A. Voedisch, and K. Gemzell-Danielsson Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception Hum Reprod Update 17 1 2011 121 137
3. J.F. Peipert, T. Madden, J.E. Allsworth, and G.M. Secura Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception Obstet Gynecol 120 6 2012 1291 1297
4. J.J. Speidel, C.C. Harper, and W.C. Shields The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy Contraception 78 3 2008 197 200
5. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices Obstet Gynecol 118 1 2011 184 196
6. American College of O, Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic P, Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working G ACOG Committee Opinion no. 450: increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy Obstet Gynecol 114 6 2009 1434 1438
7. Committee on Adolescent Health Care Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Working Group TACoO Gynecologists: Committee opinion no. 539: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices Obstet Gynecol 120 4 2012 983 988
8. T. Madden, J.E. Allsworth, K.J. Hladky, G.M. Secura, and J.F. Peipert Intrauterine contraception in Saint Louis: a survey of obstetrician and gynecologists' knowledge and attitudes Contraception 81 2 2010 112 116
9. L.B. Finer, J. Jerman, and M.L. Kavanaugh Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009 Fertil Steril 98 4 2012 893 897
10. D. Hubacher, L.B. Finer, and E. Espey Renewed interest in intrauterine contraception in the United States: evidence and explanation Contraception 83 4 2011 291 294
11. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Practice Bulletin No. 121 Obstet Gynecol 118 2011 184 196
12. Centers for Disease C Prevention: U S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010 MMWR Recomm Rep 59 RR-4 2010 1 86
13. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. World Contraceptive Use 2010 2011 http://www.un.org/esa/population/ publications/contraceptive2011/contraceptive2011.htm.
14. A. Bergin, S. Tristan, M. Terplan, M.L. Gilliam, and A.K. Whitaker A missed opportunity for care: two-visit IUD insertion protocols inhibit placement Contraception 86 6 2012 694 697
15. J.A. Ogburn, E. Espey, and J. Stonehocker Barriers to intrauterine device insertion in postpartum women Contraception 72 6 2005 426 429 (Pubitemid 41676832)
16. K. Tocce, J. Sheeder, J. Python, and S.B. Teal Long acting reversible contraception in postpartum adolescents: early initiation of etonogestrel implant is superior to IUDs in the outpatient setting J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 25 1 2012 59 63
17. M.C. Fox, J. Oat-Judge, K. Severson, R.M. Jamshidi, R.H. Singh, and R. McDonald-Mosley Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination Contraception 83 1 2011 34 40
18. M. Cremer, K.A. Bullard, R.M. Mosley, C. Weiselberg, M. Molaei, and V. Lerner Immediate vs. delayed post-abortal copper T 380A IUD insertion in cases over 12 weeks of gestation Contraception 83 6 2011 522 527
19. M.L. Kavanaugh, L. Frohwirth, J. Jerman, R. Popkin, and K. Ethier Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 26 2 2013 86 95
20. C. Dehlendorf, K. Levy, R. Ruskin, and J. Steinauer Health care providers' knowledge about contraceptive evidence: a barrier to quality family planning care? Contraception 81 4 2010 292 298
21. R.I.G. Kane, S. Brown, N. Purks, M. Walling, and S. Killick Long-acting, reversible and permanent methods of contraception: insight into women's choice of method Qual Prim Care 17 2 2009 107 114
22. R.C. Wong, R.J. Bell, K. Thunuguntla, K. McNamee, and B. Vollenhoven Implanon users are less likely to be satisfied with their contraception after 6 months than IUD users Contraception 80 5 2009 452 456
23. C. Harper, T.T. Raine, K.K. Thompson, L.L. Stratton, and J.J. Speidel Advance practice clinicians and provision of long-acting reversible contraceptives in the United States: results from a national survey Contraception 84 3 2011 333
24. K. Adams, and M.W. Beal Implanon: a review of the literature with recommendations for clinical management J Midwifery Womens Health 54 2 2009 142 149
25. K.M. Thompson, J.J. Speidel, V. Saporta, N.J. Waxman, and C.C. Harper Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception Contraception 83 1 2011 41 47
26. L. Cheng, Y. Che, and A.M. Gulmezoglu Interventions for emergency contraception Cochrane Database Syst Rev 8 2012 CD001324
27. P. Belden, C.C. Harper, and J.J. Speidel The copper IUD for emergency contraception, a neglected option Contraception 85 4 2012 338 339
28. K. Cleland, H. Zhu, N. Goldstuck, L. Cheng, and J. Trussell The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience Hum Reprod 27 7 2012 1994 2000
29. C.C. Harper, J.J. Speidel, E.A. Drey, J. Trussell, M. Blum, and P.D. Darney Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception clinical practice among contraceptive providers Obstet Gynecol 119 2 2012 220 226
30. A.E. Hubbard, J. Ahern, N.L. Fleischer, M. Van der Laan, S.A. Lippman, and N. Jewell To GEE or not to GEE: comparing population average and mixed models for estimating the associations between neighborhood risk factors and health Epidemiology 21 4 2010 467 474
31. Centers for Disease C Prevention: contraceptive methods available to patients of office-based physicians and title X clinics - - United States, 2009-2010 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 60 1 2011 1 4
32. D.J. Landry, J. Wei, and J.J. Frost Public and private providers' involvement in improving their patients' contraceptive use Contraception 78 1 2008 42 51
33. ACOG Committee on Gynecological Practice ACOG committee opinion No. 431: routine pelvic examination and cervical cytology screening Obstet Gynecol 113 5 2009 1190 1193
34. H.Y. Park, M.I. Rodriguez, D. Hulett, P.D. Darney, and H. Thiel de Bocanegra Long-acting reversible contraception method use among Title X providers and non-Title X providers in California Contraception 86 5 2012 557 561