Donor site healing dynamics: Molecular, Histological, and Noninvasive imaging assessment in a porcine model

Journal of Burn Care and Research

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 549-562

  Mauskar, Neil A ^a   Sood, Subeena ^b   Travis, Taryn E ^a   Matt, Sarah E ^a   Mino, Matthew J ^a   Burnett, Mary Susan ^b   Moffatt, Lauren T ^a   Fidler, Philip ^a   Epstein, Stephen E ^b   Jordan, Marion H ^a   Shupp, Jeffrey W ^a  

^a WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^b MEDSTAR RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLLAGEN; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; FORMALDEHYDE; GELATINASE A; GELATINASE B; INTERLEUKIN 10; PARAFFIN; TENASCIN; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA; WNT PROTEIN; WNT1 PROTEIN; WNT5A PROTEIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMATOME; DONOR SITE; EPITHELIZATION; EXCISION; GENE EXPRESSION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MALE; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NONHUMAN; PERFUSION; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PUNCH BIOPSY; RNA ISOLATION; SWINE; WOUND HEALING;

ANIMALS; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BURNS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DNA, COMPLEMENTARY; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; KI-67 ANTIGEN; LASER-DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; MALE; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RNA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN TRANSPLANTATION; SWINE; TRANSPLANT DONOR SITE; UP-REGULATION; WOUND HEALING; WOUNDS AND INJURIES;

EID: 84885310794     PISSN: 1559047X     EISSN: 15590488     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e3182839aca     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Kagan R, Robb E, Plessinger R. The skin bank. In: Herndon, DM. Total Burn Care. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders Elsevier; 2007:229-38.
2. Thomas DW, O?Neill ID, Harding KG, Shepherd JP. Cutaneous wound healing: A current perspective. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:442-7.
3. Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Engl J Med 1999;341:738-46.
4. Zhu KQ, Carrougher GJ, Couture OP, Tuggle CK, Gibran NS, Engrav LH. Expression of collagen genes in the cones of skin in the Duroc/Yorkshire porcine model of fibroproliferative scarring. J Burn Care Res. 29:815-27.
5. Price JA, Rogers JV, McDougal JN, Shaw MQ, Reid FM, Graham JS. Transcriptional changes in porcine skin at 7 days following sulfur mustard and thermal burn injury. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2009;28:129-40.
6. Fullerton A, Stücker M, Wilhelm KP, et al; European Society of Contact Dermatitis Standardization Group. Guidelines for visualization of cutaneous blood flow by laser Doppler perfusion imaging. A report from the Standardization Group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis based upon the HIRELADO European community project. Contact Derm 2002;46:129-40.
7. Choi CM, Bennett RG. Laser Dopplers to determine cutaneous blood flow. Dermatol Surg 2003;29:272-80.
8. Jaskille AD, Shupp JW, Jordan MH, Jeng JC. Critical review of burn depth assessment techniques: Part I. Historical review. J Burn Care Res 2009;30:937-47.
9. Ferrell WR, Balint PV, Sturrock RD. Novel use of laser Doppler imaging for investigating epicondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2000;39:1214-7.
10. Khan AA, Banwell PE, Bakker MC, Gillespie PG, McGrouther DA, Roberts AH. Topical radiant heating in wound healing: an experimental study in a donor site wound model. Int Wound J 2004;1:233-40.
11. Montagna W, Yun JS. The skin of the domestic pig. J Invest Dermatol 1964;42:11-21.
12. Meyer W, Schwarz R, Neurand K. The skin of domestic mammals as a model for the human skin, with special reference to the domestic pig. Curr Probl Dermatol 1978;7:39-52.
13. Wang JF, Olson ME, Reno CR, Wright JB, Hart DA. The pig as a model for excisional skin wound healing: characterization of the molecular and cellular biology, and bacteriology of the healing process. Comp Med 2001;51: 341-8.
14. Sullivan TP, Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mertz P. The pig as a model for human wound healing. Wound Repair Regen 2001;9:66-76.
15. Zhu KQ, Carrougher GJ, Gibran NS, Isik FF, Engrav LH. Review of the female Duroc/Yorkshire pig model of human fibroproliferative scarring. Wound Repair Regen 2007;15(Suppl 1):S32-9.
16. Gallant CL, Olson ME, Hart DA. Molecular, histologic, and gross phenotype of skin wound healing in red Duroc pigs reveals anabnormal healing phenotype of hypercontracted, hyperpigm ented scarring. Wound Repair Regen 2004;12:305-19.
17. Kim LH, Ward D, Lam L, Holland AJ. The impact of laser Doppler imaging on time to grafting decisions in pediatric burns. J Burn Care Res 2010;31:328-32.
18. Brennan P, Silman A. Statistical methods for assessing observer variability in clinical measures. BMJ 1992;304:1491-4.
19. Miller GE, Chen E. Life stress and diminished expression of genes encoding glucocorticoid receptor and beta2-adrenergic receptor in children with asthma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:5496-501.
20. Profyris C, Tziotzios C, Do Vale I. Cutaneous scarring: pathophysiology, molecular mechanisms, and scar reduction therapeutics Part I. The molecular basis of scar formation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2012;66:1-10; quiz 11-2.
21. Gupta S, Lawrence WT. Wound healing: normal and abnormal mechanisms and closure techniques. In: O?leary JP, Tebuenca, A. The Physiologic Basis of Surgery. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2008:150-75.
22. Stadelmann WK, Digenis AG, Tobin GR. Physiology and healing dynamics of chronic cutaneous wounds. Am J Surg 1998;176:26S-38S.
23. Gillitzer R, Goebeler M. Chemokines in cutaneous wound healing. J Leukoc Biol 2001;69:513-21.
24. Pelus LM, Bian H, King AG, Fukuda S. Neutrophil-derived MMP-9 mediates synergistic mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitorcells by the combination of G-CSF and the chemokines GRObeta/CXCL2 and GRObetaT/CXCL2delta4. Blood 2004;103:110-9.
25. Moore KW, O?Garra A, de Waal Malefyt R, Vieira P, Mosmann TR. Interleukin-10. Annu Rev Immunol 1993; 11:165-90.
26. Gilroy DW, Colville-Nash PR, Willis D, Chivers J, Paul-Clark MJ, Willoughby DA. Inducible cyclooxygenase may have anti-inflammatory properties. Nat Med 1999;5:698-701.
27. Latijnhouwers MA, Bergers M, Van Bergen BH, Spruijt KI, Andriessen MP, Schalkwijk J. Tenascin expression during wound healing in human skin. J Pathol 1996;178:30-5.
28. Mackie EJ, Halfter W, Liverani D. Induction of tenascin in healing wounds. J Cell Biol 1998;107(6 Pt 2):2757-67.
29. Whitby DJ, Longaker MT, Harrison MR, Adzick NS, Ferguson MW. Rapid epithelialisation of fetal wounds is associated with the early deposition of tenascin. J Cell Sci 1991;99(Pt 3):583-6.
30. Braungart E, Magdolen V, Degitz K. Retinoic acid upregulates the plasminogen activator system in human epidermal keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 2001;116:778-84.
31. Van Lint P, Libert C. Chemokine and cytokine processing by matrix metalloproteinases and its effect on leukocytemigration and inflammation. J Leukoc Biol 2007;82: 1375-81.
32. Sawicki G, Marcoux Y, Sarkhosh K, Tredget EE, Ghahary A. Interaction of keratinocytes and fibroblasts modulates the expression of matrix metalloproteinases-2 and-9 and their inhibitors. Mol Cell Biochem 2005;269:209-16.
33. Gu B, Watanabe K, Dai X. Epithelial stem cells: an epigenetic and Wnt-centric perspective. J Cell Biochem 2010;110:1279-87.
34. Guo L, Degenstein L, Fuchs E. Keratinocyte growth factor is required for hair development but not for wound healing. Genes Dev 1996;10:165-75.
35. Amjad SB, Carachi R, Edward M. Keratinocyte regulation of TGF-beta and connective tissue growth factor expression: A role in suppression of scar tissue formation. Wound Repair Regen 2007;15:748-55.
36. Valluru M, Staton CA, Reed MW, Brown NJ. Transforming growth factor-? and endoglin signaling orchestrate wound healing. Front Physiol 2011;2:89.
37. Eskes AM, Brölmann FE, Gerbens LA, Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H; REMBRANDT study group. Which dressing do donor site wounds need? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2011;12:229.
38. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.