Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of functionally significant obstructive coronary artery disease: A prospective study

International Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 168, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 765-773

  Bettencourt, Nuno ^a,b,c   Chiribiri, Amedeo ^b   Schuster, Andreas ^b   Ferreira, Nuno ^a   Sampaio, Francisco ^a,c   Duarte, Ricardo ^d   Santos, Lino ^a   Melica, Bruno ^a   Rodrigues, Alberto ^a   Braga, Pedro ^a   Teixeira, Madalena ^a   Simões, Lino ^a   Leite Moreira, Adelino ^c   Silva Cardoso, José ^c   Nagel, Eike ^b   Portugal, Pedro ^d   Gama, Vasco ^a  

^a CENTRO HOSPITALAR DE VILA NOVA DE GAIA ESPINHO   (Portugal)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c University of Porto   (Portugal)

^d Centro Hospitalar de Gaia/Espinho   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Adenosine; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Coronary artery disease; Fractional flow reserve; Perfusion; Stress testing

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE; GADOBUTROL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CINERADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADENOSINE; CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; PERFUSION; STRESS TESTING;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84885306914     PISSN: 01675273     EISSN: 18741754     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.09.231     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Yusuf S, Reddy S, Ounpuu S, Anand S. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases: part I: general considerations, the epidemiologic transition, risk factors, and impact of urbanization. Circulation 2001;104(22):2746-53.
2. Van de Werf F, Ardissino D, Betriu A, et al. Cardiology TFotMoAMIotESo. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. The Task Force on the Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2003;24(1):28-66.
3. Antman E, Anbe D, Armstrong P, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44(3):E1-211.
4. Morton G, Schuster A, Perera D, Nagel E. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging to guide complex revascularization in stable coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2010;31(18):2209-15.
5. Hesse B, Tägil K, Cuocolo A, et al. EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2005;32(7): 855-97.
6. Bettencourt N, Chiribiri A, Schuster A, Nagel E. Assessment of myocardial ischemia and viability using cardiac magnetic resonance. Curr Heart Fail Rep 2009;6(3):142-53.
7. Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, et al. Resonance SfCM, Cardiology WGoCMRotESo. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. Eur Heart J 2004;25(21):1940-65.
8. Cullen JH, Horsfield MA, Reek CR, Cherryman GR, Barnett DB, Samani NJ. A myocardial perfusion reserve index in humans using first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;33(5):1386-94.
9. Lanza G, Buffon A, Sestito A, et al. Relation between stress-induced myocardial perfusion defects on cardiovascular magnetic resonance and coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with cardiac syndrome X. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51(4): 466-72.
10. Lee DC, Simonetti OP, Harris KR, et al. Magnetic resonance versus radionuclide pharmacological stress perfusion imaging for flow-limiting stenoses of varying severity. Circulation 2004;110(1):58-65.
11. Schwitter J, Nanz D, Kneifel S, et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography. Circulation 2001;103(18):2230-5.
12. Jaarsma C, Leiner T, Bekkers SC, Crijns HJ, Wildberger JE, Nagel E, Nelemans PJ, Schalla S. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2012;59(19):1719-28.
13. Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet 2012;379(9814):453-60.
14. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, et al. Investigators ftM-I. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial. Eur Heart J 2012.
15. Watkins S, Mcgeoch R, Lyne J, et al. Validation of magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with fractional flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary heart disease. Circulation 2009;120(22):2207-13.
16. Lockie T, Ishida M, Perera D, et al. High-resolution magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging at 3.0-Tesla to detect hemodynamically significant coronary stenoses as determined by fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57(1):70-5.
17. Morise AP, Haddad WJ, Beckner D. Development and validation of a clinical score to estimate the probability of coronary artery disease in men and women presenting with suspected coronary disease. Am J Med 1997;102(4):350-6.
18. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Imaging AHAWGoMSaRfC. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2002;105(4):539-42.
19. Rieber J, Huber A, Erhard I, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2006;27(12):1465-71.
20. Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur MR, Carlos RC. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;50(14):1343-53.
21. White CW, Wright CB, Doty DB, et al. Does visual interpretation of the coronary arteriogram predict the physiologic importance of a coronary stenosis? N Eng J Med 1984;310(13):819-24.
22. Pijls NHJ, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(21):2105-11.
23. Tonino PAL, de Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009;360(3): 213-24.
24. Pijls NHJ, Fearon WF, Tonino PAL, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. JAC 2011;56(3):177-84.
25. Balachandran KP, Berry C, Norrie J, et al. Relation between coronary pressure derived collateral flow, myocardial perfusion grade, and outcome in left ventricular function after rescue percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart 2004;90(12): 1450-4.
26. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet 2003;361(9355): 374-9.
27. Jahnke C, Nagel E, Gebker R, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance stress tests: adenosine stress perfusion and dobutamine stresswallmotion imaging. Circulation 2007;115(13):1769-76.
28. Bruder O, Schneider S, Nothnagel D, et al. EuroCMR (European Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance) registry: results of the German pilot phase. J AmColl Cardiol 2009;54(15):1457-66.
29. Kim HW, Klem I, Shah DJ, et al. Unrecognized non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: prevalence and prognostic significance in patients with suspected coronary disease. PLoS Med 2009;6(4):e1000057.