Making family care work: Dependence, privacy and remote home monitoring telecare systems

UbiComp 2013 - Proceedings of the 2013 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 607-616

  Vines, John ^a   Lindsay, Stephen ^c   Pritchard, Gary W ^b   Lie, Mabel ^b   Greathead, David ^a,d   Olivier, Patrick ^a   Brittain, Katie ^b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ageing in place; Home sensing; Older people; Privacy; Trust

Indexed keywords

AGEING IN PLACE; AGEING POPULATION; HOME SENSING; INDEPENDENT LIVING; OLDER PEOPLE; REMOTE MONITORING SYSTEM; TELE-CARE SYSTEMS; TRUST;

DATA PRIVACY; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

REMOTE PATIENT MONITORING;

EID: 84885231063     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2493432.2493469     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Beach, S., et al. Disability, age, and informational privacy attitudes in quality of life technology applications: Results from a national web survey. Transactions on Accessible Computing, 2 (1), 5.
2. Birnholtz, J., and Jones-Rounds, M. Independence and interaction: Understanding seniors' privacy and awareness needs for aging in place. In: Proc. CHI '10, ACM (Press), 143-152.
3. Blythe, M., Wright, P., and Monk, A. Little brother: Could and should wearable computing technologies be applied to reducing older people's fear of crime? Personal & Ubiquitous Computing, 2004 (8), 402-415.
4. Boult, C., and Wieland, G. Comprehensive primary care for older patients with multiple chronic conditions. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 304 (17), 1936-1943.
5. Braun, V., and Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3 (2), 77-101.
6. Brownsell, S. and Bradley, D. Assistive Technology and Telecare: Forging Solutions for Independent Living. Bristol, The Policy Press, 2003.
7. Caine, K. et al. DigiSwitch: A device to allow older adults to monitor and direct the collection and transmission of health information collected at home. J. of Medical Systems, 35 (5), 1181-1195.
8. Campbell, R., et al. Towards security and privacy for pervasive computing. In: Proc. ISSS '02, 2002 (Springer), 1-15.
9. Choe, E., et al. Living in a glass house: A survey of private moments in the home. In: Proc. UbiComp '11, ACM (2011), 41-44.
10. Consolvo, S., Roessler, P, and Shelton, B. The CareNet display: Lessons learned from and in home evaluation of an ambient display. In: Proc. UbiComp '04, Springer-Verlag (2004), 1-17.
11. Department of Health. Recognised, valued and supported: Next steps for the carers strategy. HM Government, London, 2010. FamilyLink http://www.familylink.net/.
12. Fänge, A, and Ivanoff, S. The home is the hub of health in very old age: Findings from the ENABLE-AGE project. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 48 (3), 340-345.
13. Henderson, C., et al. Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions. British Medical Journal, 2013 (346), f1035.
14. Huber, L., et al. How in-home technologies mediate caregiving relationships in later life. Int. J. of Human-Computer Interaction, 29 (7), 441-455.
15. Kenner, A. Securing the elderly body: Dementia, surveillance, and the politics of "aging in place". Surveillance & Society, 5 (3), 252-269.
16. Magnusson, L. and Hanson, E. Ethical issues arising from a research, technology and development project to support frail Older People and their Family Carers at Home. Housing and Social Care in the Community, 11, 431-439.
17. McGee-Lennon, M., Wolters, M., and Brewster, S. User-centred multimodal reminders for assistive living. In: Proc. CHI '11, ACM (2011), 2105-2114.
18. Melander-Wikman, A., et al. Safety vs. privacy: elderly persons' experiences of a mobile safety alarm. Health and Social Care in the Community, 16(4), 337-346.
19. Mynatt, E. D., Essa, I. and Rogers, W. A. Increasing the opportunities for aging in place. In ACM Universal Usability (2000), 65-71.
20. Nehmer, J., Becker, M., Karshmer, A., and Lamm, R. Living assistance systems: An ambient intelligence approach. In: Proc. ICSE '06, ACM (2006), 43-50.
21. O2. Help at hand. www.o2.co.uk/health/helpathand.
22. Olivier, P., et al. Ambient kitchen: Designing situated services using a high fidelity prototyping environment. In: Proc. PETRA '09, ACM (2009), 49.
23. Oulasvirta, A., et al. Long-term effects of ubiquitous surveillance in the home. In: Proc. UbiComp '12, ACM (2012), 41-50.
24. Philips. Lifeline with AutoAlert. http://www.lifelinesys.com/content/ lifeline-products/auto-alert.
25. Richie, Y., and Mackay, W. PeerCare: Supporting awareness of rhythms and routines for better aging in place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 2010 (19), 73-104.
26. Rowan, J., and Mynatt, E. Digital family portrait field trial: Support for aging in place. In: Proc. CHI '05, ACM (2005), 521-530.
27. Shankar, K, et al. Aging, privacy, and home-based computing: Developing a design framework. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 11 (4), 46-54.
28. Sixsmith, A. An evaluation of an intelligent home monitoring system. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 6 (2), 63-72.
29. Sixsmith, A., and Sixsmith, J. Ageing in place in the United Kingdom. Ageing International, 2008 (32), 219-223.
30. Stroomer, B., et al. CommunityNet: Mediating care at the local community level. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7040, 2011 Springer-Verlag), 275-284.
31. Vergados, D. Service personalization for assistive living in a mobile healthcare-networked environment. Pers Ubiquit Comput, 2010 (14), 575-590.
32. Walker, A. The economic 'burden' of ageing and the prospect of intergenerational conflict. Ageing and Society, 10 (4), 377-396.
33. Wiles, J., Leibnig, A., Guberman, N., Reeve, J., and Allen, R. The meaning of "ageing in place to older people. The gerontologist, 52 (3), 357-366.
34. World Health Organisation. Data and statistics on world ageing. http://www.who.int/research/en.