DigiSwitch: A device to allow older adults to monitor and direct the collection and transmission of health information collected at home

Journal of Medical Systems

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1181-1195

  Caine, Kelly E ^a   Zimmerman, Celine Y ^a   Schall Zimmerman, Zachary ^a   Hazlewood, William R ^a   Jean Camp, L ^a   Connelly, Katherine H ^a   Huber, Lesa L ^a   Shankar, Kalpana ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Aging in place; Home; Home monitoring; Older adult; Privacy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CAREGIVER SUPPORT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; FEMALE; GERIATRIC CARE; HOME; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIVACY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HOME CARE SERVICES; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRIVACY; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84856213226     PISSN: 01485598     EISSN: 1573689X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10916-011-9722-1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. AARP. Healthy at Home. Retrieved from http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/il/ healthy-home.pdf, (2008).
2. A Acquisti R Gross 2006 Imagined communities: awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In Proceedings of the 6th Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET) Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 4258 36 58 10.1007/11957454-3
3. Administration on aging. Retrieved Mar 1, 2010. http://www.aoa.gov.
4. Ameen, M. A.; Liu, J.; and Kwak, K. Security and privacy issues in wireless sensor networks for healthcare applications. J. Med. Syst.; 2010.
5. S Beach R Schulz W Bruin J Downs D Musa J Matthews 2008 Privacy attitudes and quality of life technology in disabled and non-disabled baby boomers and older adults Gerontologist 48 2 46
6. Beckwith, R.; Designing for ubiquity: The perception of privacy. IEEE Pervasive 2(2):40-46, 2002.
7. Bellotti, V.; Back, M.; Edwards, W. K.; Grinter, R. E.; Henderson, A, and Lopes, C. Making sense of sensing systems: Five questions for designers and researchers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2002.
8. Bishop, L. S.; Holmes, B. J.; and Kelley, C. M.; National consumer health privacy survey. California HealthCare Foundation, Oakland, 2005.
9. Blanson Henkemans, O. A.; Caine, K. E, Rogers, W. A.; Fisk, A. D.; Neerinex, M. A.; and de Ruyter, B. Medical monitoring for independent living: user-centered design of smart home technologies for older adults. In Proceedings of the Med-e-Tel Conference for eHealth, Telemedicine and Health Information and Communication Technologies, 2007.
10. GT Buhr M Kuchibhatia EC Clipp 2005 Caregivers' reasons for nursing home placement: Clues for improving discussions with families prior to the transition Gerontologist 46 1 52 61 10.1093/geront/46.1.52
11. E Cahill LM Lewis FK Barg HR Bogner 2009 "You don't want to burden them": older adults' views on family involvement in care J. Fam. Nurs. 15 3 295 317 10.1177/1074840709337247
12. Caine, K. E. Visual sensing devices in home-care systems. In Proceedings of the Security and Privacy in Medical and Home Care Systems Workshop, 2009.
13. Caine, K. E.; Fisk, A. D.; and Rogers, W. A. Benefits and privacy concerns of a home equipped with a visual sensing system: a perspective from older adults. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2006.
14. Caine, K. E.; Fisk, A. D.; and Rogers, W. A. Designing privacy conscious aware homes for older adults. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2007.
15. Computing Consortium Community. Information Technology Research Challenges for Healthcare: From Discovery to Delivery, 2010.
16. Consolvo, S.; Smith, I. E.; Matthews, T.; LaMarca, A.,Tabert, J.; and Powledge, P. Location disclosure to social relations: why, when, & what people want to share. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2005.
17. J Crowley J Coutaz F Berard 2001 Perceptual user interfaces: Things that see Commun. ACM 43 3 54 56 10.1145/330534.330540
18. C Dawes CD Phillips M Rose S Holan M Sherman 2003 A national survey of assisted living facilities Gerontologist 43 6 875 882 10.1093/geront/43.6.875
19. Edwards,W. K.; and Grinter, R. At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In Proceedings of the Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, 2008.
20. Ethical Technology in the Homes of Seniors. Retrieved Mar 1, 2010. http://ethos.indiana.edu.
21. Farzanfar, R.; Finkelstein, J.; and Friedman, R. H.; Testing the usability of two automated home-based patient-management systems. J. Med. Syst. 28(2):143-153, 2004.
22. Fisk, R. D.; Rogers, W. A.; Charness, N.; Czaja, S. J.; and Sharit, J.; Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, 2nd edition. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009.
23. M Ganguli E Seaberg S Belle L Fischer LH Kuller 1993 Cognitive impairment and the use of health services in an elderly rural population: the MoVIES project. Monongahela Valley elders survey J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 41 10 1065 1070
24. JM Guralnik L Alecxih LG Branch JM Wiener 2002 Medical and long-term care costs when older persons become more dependent Am. J. Public Health 92 8 1244 1245 10.2105/AJPH.92.8.1244
25. Kolodner, L.; McCuan, E.; and Levenson, J.; Screening and supportive techniques for home dialysis in the treatment of renal failure. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 24(1):32-36, 1976.
26. Kumaraguru, P.; and Cranor, L. Privacy indexes: a survey of Westin's studies. Institute for Software Research International (ISRI), Carnegie Mellon University, 2005. Retrieved June 1, 2010. http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~ponguru/CMU- ISRI-05-138.pdf.
27. Lederer, S.; Mankoff, J.; and Dey, A. K. Who wants to know what when? Privacy preference determinants in ubiquitous computing. In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2003.
28. Lorenzen-Huber, L.; Boutain, M.; Shankar, K.; Camp, L. J.; and Connelly, K. Privacy, independence, and relationships: older adults' perceptions of home-based ubiquitous technologies. Ageing International, 2010.
29. A Mui D Burnette 1994 A comparative profile of frail elderly persons living alone and those living with others J. Gerontol. Soc. Work 21 3 & 4 5 26 10.1300/J083V21N03-02
30. Mutschler, P. H.; The effects of income on home modification: can they afford to stay put? In: Lanspery, S.; and Hyde, J. (Eds.), Staying Put: Adapting the Places Instead of the People. Baywood Publishing Company, Inc, Amityville, pp. 149-168, 1997.
31. C Neustaedter S Greenberg M Boyle 2006 Blur filtration fails to preserve privacy for home-based video conferencing ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. 13 1 1 36 10.1145/1143518.1143519
32. Olson, J. S.; Grudin, J.; and Horvitz, E. A study of preferences for sharing and privacy. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2005.
33. Pynoos, J.; and Regnier, V.; Design directives in home adaptation. In: Lanspery, S.; and Hyde, J. (Eds.), Staying Put: Adapting the Places Instead of the People. Baywood Publishing Company, Inc, Amityville, pp. 41-54, 1997.
34. Ross, P. E. Managing care through the air. IEEE Spectrum (Dec. 2004), 26-31, 2004.
35. Stead, W. W.; and Lin, H. S. Computational technology for effective health care: Immediate steps and strategic directions. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C.; 2009. Retrieved Mar 3, 2010. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/pubs/ reports/comptech-prepub.pdf
36. Tang, P. C.; Ash, J. S.; Bates, D. W.; Overhage, J. M.; and Sands, D. Z.; Personal health records: definitions, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13(2):121-126, 2006.
37. Tsai, J. Y.; Kelley, P.; Drielsma, P.; Cranor, L. F.; Hong, J.; and Sadeh, N. Who's viewed you? The impact of feedback in a mobile location-sharing application. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2009.
38. Warren, and Brandeis. The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review. 1890.
39. TZ Zarsky 2003 Thinking outside the box: considering transparency, anonymity, and pseudonymity as overall solutions to the problems in information privacy in the internet society Univ Miami Law Rev 58 991 1044