Varieties of (de) humanization: Divided by competition and status

Nebraska Symposium on Motivation

Volumn 60, Issue , 2013, Pages 53-71

  Fiske, Susan T ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ambivalent stereotypes; Competence; Competition; Dehumanization; Outgroups; Prejudices; Status; Stereotype content model; Warmth

Indexed keywords

AGEISM; ARTICLE; BRAIN; DEHUMANIZATION; DISABLED PERSON; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HOMELESSNESS; HUMAN; JEALOUSY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SEXISM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

AGEISM; BRAIN; DEHUMANIZATION; DISABLED PERSONS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL NEUROIMAGING; HOMELESS PERSONS; HUMANS; JEALOUSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SEXISM; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 84885226293     PISSN: 01467875     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6959-9_3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (85)

1. Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 768-776.
2. Abelson, R. P., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Fiske, S. T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 619-630.
3. Ames, D. L., & Fiske, S. T. (under review). Encountering the unexpected under outcome dependency: Power relations alter the neural substrates of impression formation.
4. Ames, D. L., Fiske, S. T., & Todorov, A. T. (2011). Impression formation: A focus on others' intents. In J. Decety & J. Cacioppo (Eds.), The handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 419- 433). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Meeting of minds: The medial frontal cortex and social cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(4), 268-277.
6. Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41(3), 258-290.
7. Asch, S. E., & Zukier, H. (1984). Thinking about persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1230-1240.
8. Bergsieker, H. B., Leslie, L. M., Constantine, V. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). Stereotyping by omission: Eliminate the negative, accentuate the positive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 1214-1238.
9. Bodenhausen, G. V., & Peery, D. (2009). Social categorization and stereotyping in vivo: The VUCA challenge. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(2), 133-151.
10. Brewer, M. B. (1988). A dual process model of impression formation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer Jr (Eds.), Advances in social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-36)., A dual process model of impression formation Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Brewer, M. B., & Feinstein, A. S. H. (1999). Dual processes in the cognitive representation of persons and social categories. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 255-270). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Campbell, D. T. (1965). Ethnocentric and other altruistic motives. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 13, pp. 283-311). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
13. Caprariello, P. A., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Fiske, S. T. (2009). Social structure shapes cultural stereotypes and emotions: A causal test of the stereotype content model. Group Processes and Intergroup Behavior, 12, 147-155.
14. Cikara, M., Botvinick, M. M., & Fiske, S. T. (2011a). Us versus them: Social identity shapes neural responses to intergroup competition and harm. Psychological Science, 22, 306-313.
15. Cikara, M., Eberhardt, J. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2011b). From agents to objects: Sexist attitudes and neural responses to sexualized targets. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 540-551.
16. Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Bounded empathy: Neural responses to outgroup targets' (mis) fortunes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3791-3803.
17. Cikara, M., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). Stereotypes and schadenfreude: Behavioral and physiological markers of pleasure at others' misfortunes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 63-71.
18. Clausell, E., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). When do the parts add up to the whole? Ambivalent stereotype content for gay male subgroups. Social Cognition, 23, 157-176.
19. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2007). The BIAS map: Behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 631-648.
20. Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., Kwan, V. S. Y., Glick, P., Demoulin, S., Leyens, J-Ph, et al. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1-33.
21. Cuddy, A. J. C., Norton, M. I., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 265-283.
22. Depret, E. F., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Perceiving the powerful: Intriguing individuals versus threatening groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 461-480.
23. Durante, F., Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Kervyn, N., et al. (2013). Nations' income inequality predicts ambivalence in stereotype content: How societies mind the gap. British Journal of Social Psychology.
24. Durante, F., Volpato, C., & Fiske, S. T. (2010). Using the stereotype content model to examine group depictions in fascism: An archival approach. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 465-483.
25. Eckes, T. (2002). Paternalistic and envious gender stereotypes: Testing predictions from the stereotype content model. Sex Roles, 47(3-4), 99-114.
26. Erber, R., & Fiske, S. T. (1984). Outcome dependency and attention to inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 709-726.
27. Fiske, S. T. (1980). Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 889-906.
28. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
29. Fiske, S. T. (2002). Five core social motives, plus or minus five. In S. J. Spencer, S. Fein, M. P. Zanna, & J. Olson (Eds.), Motivated social perception: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 9). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
30. Fiske, S. T. (2011). Envy up, scorn down: How status divides us. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
31. Fiske, S. T., Bergsieker, H., Russell, A. M., & Williams, L. (2009). Images of Black Americans: Then, them and now, Obama!. DuBois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 6, 83-101.
32. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007). Universal dimensions of social perception: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 77-83.
33. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878-902.
34. Fiske, S. T., Lin, M. H., & Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years later. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 231-254). New York: Guilford.
35. Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum model of impression formation, from category- based to individuating processes: Influence of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 23, pp. 1-74). New York: Academic Press.
36. Fiske, S. T., Neuberg, S. L., Beattie, A. E., & Milberg, S. J. (1987). Category-based and attributebased reactions to others: Some informational conditions of stereotyping and individuating processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 399-427.
37. Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (in press). Social cognition: From brains to culture. London: Sage.
38. Fiske, S. T., & Von Hendy, H. M. (1992). Personality feedback and situational norms can control stereotyping processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 577-596.
39. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
40. Goodwin, S. A., Fiske, S. T., Rosen, L. D., & Rosenthal, A. M. (2002). The eye of the beholder: Romantic goals and impression biases. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 232-241.
41. Graziano, W. G., Habashi, M. M., & Woodcock, A. (2011). Exploring and measuring differences in person-thing orientations. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 28-33.
42. Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Dehumanizing the lowest of the low: Neuro-imaging responses to extreme outgroups. Psychological Science, 17, 847-853.
43. Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2007). Social groups that elicit disgust are differentially processed in mPFC. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 45-51.
44. Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2008). The brooms in Fantasia: Neural correlates of anthropomorphizing objects. Social Cognition, 26, 210-223.
45. Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2010). Neural regions that underlie reinforcement learning are also active for social expectancy violations. Social Neuroscience, 5, 76-91.
46. Harris, L. T., & Fiske, S. T. (2011). Dehumanized perception: A psychological means to facilitate atrocities, torture, and genocide? Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, Topical Issue on Torture., 21(3), 175-181.
47. Harris, L. T., McClure, S. M., van den Bos, W., Cohen, J. D., & Fiske, S. T. (2007). Regions of MPFC differentially tuned to social and non-social affective evaluation. Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 309-316.
48. Harris, L. T., Todorov, A., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). Attributions on the brain: Neuro-imaging dispositional inferences, beyond theory of mind. NeuroImage, 28, 763-769.
49. Haslam, N., Loughnan, S., & Holland, E. (2013). The psychology of humanness. In S. J. Gervais (Ed.), Objectification and dehumanization (pp. 25-52). New York: Springer.
50. Heider, F. (1960). The Gestalt theory of motivation. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 145-172). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
51. Hill, C. T. (1987). Affiliation motivation: People who need people, But in different ways. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1008-1018.
52. Ito, T. A., Larsen, J. T., Smith, N. K., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1998). Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: The negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 887-900.
53. Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 220-266). New York: Academic Press.
54. Katz, D., & Braly, K. (1933). Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 28(3), 280-290.
55. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192-238). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
56. Kervyn, N., Bergsieker, H. B., & Fiske, S. T. (2012a). The innuendo effect: Hearing the positive but inferring the negative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 77-85.
57. Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Malone, C. (2012). Brands as intentional agents framework: Warmth and competence map brand perception. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 166-176.
58. Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Yzerbyt, Y. (under review-a). Integrating the stereotype content model (warmth and competence) and Osgood's semantic differential (evaluation, potency, and activity
59. Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Yzerbyt, Y. (under review-b). Why is the primary dimension of social cognition so hard to predict? Symbolic and realistic threats together predict warmth in the stereotype content model.
60. Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284-308.
61. Lee, T. L., & Fiske, S. T. (2006). Not an outgroup, but not yet an ingroup: Immigrants in the stereotype content model. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 751-768.
62. Matlin, M., & Stang, D. (1978). The Pollyanna principle. Cambridge: Schenkman.
63. Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Forming impressions of people versus inanimate objects: Social-cognitive processing in the medial prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 26, 251-257.
64. Neuberg, S. L., & Fiske, S. T. (1987). Motivational influences on impression formation: Outcome dependency, accuracy-driven attention, and individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 431-444.
65. North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (2012). An inconvenienced youth: Ageism and its potential intergenerational roots. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 982-997.
66. North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (in press-a). Act your (old) age: Prescriptive, ageist biases over succession, identity, and consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
67. North, M. S., & Fiske, S. T. (in press-b). SIC (succession, identity, and consumption) Scale of ageism. Psychological Assessment.
68. Oldmeadow, J., & Fiske, S. T. (2007). Ideology moderates status=competence stereotypes: Roles for belief in a just world and social dominance orientation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1135-1148.
69. Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana Ill.: University of Illinois Press.
70. Pavelchak, M. A. (1989). Piecemeal and category-based evaluation: An idiographic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 354-363.
71. Peeters, G. (2002). From good and bad to can and must: Subjective necessity of acts associated with positively and negatively valued stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 125-136.
72. Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751-783.
73. Rosenberg, S., Nelson, C., & Vivekananthan, P. S. (1968). A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 283-294.
74. Ruscher, J. B., & Fiske, S. T. (1990). Interpersonal competition can cause individuating processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 832-843.
75. Sears, D. O. (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 233-240.
76. Sevillano, V., & Fiske, S. T. (under review). Animal collective: Social perception of animals.
77. Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
78. Smith, R. H., & Kim, S. H. (2007). Comprehending envy. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 46-64.
79. Stevens, L. E., & Fiske, S. T. (2000). Motivated impressions of a power holder: Accuracy under task dependency and misperception under evaluative dependency. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 907-922.
80. Swencionis, J. K., & Fiske, S. T. (in press). More human: Individuation in the 21st century. In P. Bain, J. Vaes, & J-Ph. Leyens (Eds.), Are we all human? Advances in understanding humanness and dehumanization. New York: Psychology Press.
81. Taylor, S. E. (1991). Asymmetrical effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 67-85.
82. Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 30(3), 829-858.
83. Wojciszke, B. (1994). Multiple meanings of behavior: Construing actions in terms of competence or morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 222-232.
84. Wojciszke, B. (2005). Affective concomitants of information on morality and competence. European Psychologist, 10, 60-70.
85. Wu, J., Ames, D. L., Swencionis, J. K., & Fiske, S. T. (in preparation). Blaming the victim: An fMRI study on how perceptions of fault influence empathy for people with disabilities.