A logic model for community engagement within the clinical and translational science awards consortium: Can we measure what we model?

Academic Medicine

Volumn 88, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1430-1436

  Eder, Milton Mickey ^a   Carter Edwards, Lori ^b,c   Hurd, Thelma C ^d   Rumala, Bernice B ^e   Wallerstein, Nina ^f  

^a Access Community Health Network   (United States)

^b IL   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio   (United States)

^e Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885181909     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829b54ae     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Eder M, Tobin JN, Proser M, Shin P. Special issue introduction: Building a stronger science of community-engaged research. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012;6:227-230.
2. National Institutes of Health. NIH launches national consortium to transform clinical research. NIH News. October 3, 2006. http://www.nih.gov/news/ pr/oct2006/ncrr-03.htm. Accessed May 7, 2013.
3. Coller BS, Califf RM. Traversin. The valley of death: A guide to assessing prospects for translational success. Sci Transl Med. 2009;1:10cm9.
4. Homer-Vanniasinkam S, Tsui J. The continuing challenges of translational research: Clinician-scientists' perspective. Cardiol Res Pract.2012;2012. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3459259/. Accessed May 9, 2013.
5. CTSA Clinical and Translational Science Awards. Strategic Goal Committee 4-Enhancin. The Health of Our Communities an. The Nation. https://www. ctsacentral.org/committee/sg4-enhancinghealth-our-communities-and-nation. Accessed May 9, 2013.
6. Califf RM, Berglund L; Principal Investigators of National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Awards. Linking scientific discovery and better health for the nation: The first three years of the NIH's Clinical and Translational Science Awards. Acad Med. 2010;85:457-462.
7. Community-Campus Partnerships for Health Web site. http://www.ccph.info. Accessed May 7, 2013.
8. Kellogg Health Scholars. Community track. http://www. kellogghealthscholars.org/about/community.cfm. Accessed May 7, 2013.
9. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Classification description: Community engagement elective classification. http:// classifications. carnegiefoundation.org/descriptions/community-engagement.php? key=1213. Accessed May 7, 2013.
10. Stokols D, Fuqua J, Gress J, et al. Evaluating transdisciplinary science. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003;5(suppl 1):S21-S39.
11. Frechtling J, Raue K, Michie J, Miyaoka A, Spiegelman M. The CTSA National Evaluation Final Report. https://www. ctsacentral.org/sites/default/ files/files/CTSANationalEval-FinalReport-20120416.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2013.
12. Macirc;sse LC, Moser RP, Stokols D, et al. Measuring collaboration and transdisciplinary integration in team science. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2 suppl):S151-S160.
13. Trochim W, Kane C, Graham MJ, Pincus HA. Evaluating translational research: A process marker model. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4:153-162.
14. Hogle J, Hower CJ, Dunham N, et al. Evaluating community engagement in research in a clinical and translational science context. Definitions Interest Group of the CTSA Evaluation Key Function Committee (unpublished).
15. Selker HP, Califf RM. The need for academic leadership in full-spectrum translational research. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4:78-79.
16. Carter-Edwards L, Cook JL, McDonald MA, Weaver SM, Chukwuka K, Eder MM. Report on CTSA consortium use of the community engagement consulting service. Clin Transl Sci. 2013;6:34-39.
17. Christoffel KK, Eder M, Kleinman LC, Hacker K. Developing a logic model to guide community engagement metrics. Poster presented at: Partnering to Improve Health: The Science of Community Engagement; May 13-14, 2010; Arlington, Va. https://www.ctsacentral.org/sites/default/files/documents/LogicModel-May- 2010-0.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2013.
18. Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (U54) Request for Applications (RFA) Number: RFARM-09-004. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa- files/RFA-RM-09-004.html. Accessed May 7, 2013.
19. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Partnerships for Environmental Public Health Evaluation Metrics Manual. NIH publication no. 12-7825. http://www.niehs.nih. gov/pephmetrics. Accessed May 7, 2013.
20. Schulz A, Israel BA, Lantz P. Instrument for evaluating dimensions of group dynamics within community-based participatory research partnerships. Eval Program Plann. 2003;26:249-262.
21. Center for the Advancement of Collaborative Strategies in Health. The Web-based partnership self-assessment tool. http://www. partnershiptool.net/. Accessed May 7, 2013.
22. Hicks S, Duran B, Wallerstein N, et al. Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012;6:289-299.
23. Sandoval JA, Lucero J, Oetzel J, et al. Process and outcome constructs for evaluating community-based participatory research projects: A matrix of existing measures. Health Educ Res. 2012;27:680-690.
24. University of New Mexico School of Medicine. Interactive CBPR Conceptual Model. Product of "Research for Improved Health: A National Study of Community-University Partnerships." http://hsc.unm.edu/SOM/fcm/cpr/ cbprmodel.shtml. Accessed May 7, 2013.
25. Pearson C, Duran B, Martin D, et al. CBPR Variable Matrix: Research for Improved Health in Academic-Community Partnerships. http://www.ces4health. info/find-products/view-product. aspx?code=FWYC2L2T. Accessed May 7, 2013.
26. National Congress of American Indians Policy Research Center Study Documents. http://narch.ncaiprc.org. Accessed May 7, 2013.
27. Staley K. Exploring impact: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. http://www.invo.org.uk/posttypepublication/exploring- impact-publicinvolvement-in-nhs-public-health-and-socialcare-research/. Accessed May 7, 2013.
28. NIH CTSA/NCATS Integration Working Group Recommendations. http://www.nih. gov/about/director/ncats/recommendations.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2013.
29. NIH/NCATS Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award (U54) RFA. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFATR-12-006.html. Accessed January 20, 2013.
30. Drezner M, Cobb N. Efficiency of the IRB review process at CTSA-sites. https://www. ctsacentral.org/sites/default/files/documents/2-drezner.pdf. Accessed May 7, 2013.
31. McCloskey DJ, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Michener JL, et al. Principles of Community Engagement. 2nd ed. Bethesda, Md: National Institutes of Health; 2011. NIH publication no. 11-778.
32. Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, Miller WL, Stewart EE, Stange KC, Jaén CR. Journey to the patient-centered medical home: A qualitative analysis of the experiences of practices in the National Demonstration Project. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(suppl 1):S45-S56, S92.
33. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Learning Health System in America Series. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011.
34. Jagosh J, Macaulay AC, Pluye P, et al. Uncoverin. The benefits of participatory research: Implications of a realist review for health research and practice. Milbank Q. 2012;90:311-346.
35. Lucero JE, Wallerstein N. Trust in community-academic research partnerships: Increasin. The consciousness of conflict and trust development. In: Ting-Toomey S, Oetzel J, eds. Sage Handbook of Conflict Communication. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2013:537-563.
36. Lucero J. Community engaged research: Measurement of process and outcomes. https://www.ctsacentral.org/documents/cbpr-interactive-model- presentation. Accessed May 7, 2013.
37. Carnwell R, Carson A. Understanding partnerships and collaboration. In: Carnwell R, Buchanan J, eds. Effective Practice in Health and Social Care: A Partnership Approach. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press; 2005:3-20.
38. Berger PL, Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday; 1966.
39. Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor BK, Moser RP. The science of team science: Overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2 suppl):S77-S89.
40. Meade CD, Calvo A. Developing community-academic partnerships to enhance breast health among rural and Hispanic migrant and seasonal farmworker women. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001;28:1577-1584.
41. Sapienza JN, Corbie-Smith G, Keim S, Fleischman AR. Community engagement in epidemiological research. Ambul Pediatr. 2007;7:247-252.
42. Viswanathan M, Ammerman A, Eng E, et al. Community-Based Participatory Research: Assessin. The Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 99. AHRQ publication 04-E022-2. http://archive.ahrq. gov/clinic/epcsums/cbprsum. htm. Accessed May 7, 2013.
43. Jones J. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York, NY: Free Press; 1981.
44. Corbie-Smith G, Thomas SB, Williams MV, Moody-Ayers S. Attitudes and beliefs of African Americans toward participation in medical research. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:537-546.
45. Washington HA. Medical Apartheid: The Dark History of Medical Experimentation on Black Americans From Colonial Times to the Present. New York, NY: Doubleday; 2006.
46. Welsome E. The Plutonium Files: America's Secret Medical Experiments in the Cold War. New York, NY: Dial Press; 1999.
47. Havasupai tribe files $50 M lawsuit against Arizona State University. East Valley Tribune. March 17, 2004:1.
48. Campbell-Voytal K. Phases of "preengagement" capacity building: Discovery, exploration, and trial alliance. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010;4:155-162.
49. Gbadegesin S, Wendler D. Protecting communities in health research from exploitation. Bioethics. 2006;20:248-253.
50. Wallerstein NB, Duran B. Using communitybased participatory research to address health disparities. Health Promot Pract. 2006;7:312-323.
51. Cochran PA, Marshall CA, Garcia-Downing C, et al. Indigenous ways of knowing: Implications for participatory research and community. Am J Public Health. 2008;98:22-27.
52. Shavers VL, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF. Racial differences in factors that influenc. The willingness to participate in medical research studies. Ann Epidemiol. 2002;12:248-256.
53. Boulware LE, Cooper LA, Ratner LE, LaVeist TA, Powe NR. Race and trust in the health care system. Public Health Rep. 2003;118:358-365.
54. Goldberg-Freeman C, Kass N, Gielen A, Tracey P, Bates-Hopkins B, Farfel M. Faculty beliefs, perceptions, and level of community involvement in their research: A survey at one urban academic institution. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010;5:65-76.
55. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevention Research Centers. http://www.cdc. gov/prc/index.htm. Accessed May 7, 2013.
56. Falk-Krzesinski HJ, Börner K, Contractor N, et al. Advancin. The science of team science. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3:263-266.
57. Abrams DB. Applying transdisciplinary research strategies to understanding and eliminating health disparities. Health Educ Behav. 2006;33:515-531.
58. Holmes JH, Lehman A, Hade E, et al. Challenges for multilevel health disparities research in a transdisciplinary environment. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2 suppl):S182-S192.
59. Hood NE, Brewer T, Jackson R, Wewers ME. Survey of community engagement in NIHfunded research. Clin Transl Sci. 2010;3:19-22.
60. Jones L, Wells K, Norris K, Meade B, Koegel P. The vision, valley, and victory of community engagement. Ethn Dis. 2009;19(autumn suppl 6):S6-3-S6-7.
61. Jones L, Meade B, Forge N, et al. Begin your partnership: The process of engagement. Ethn Dis. 2009;19(autumn suppl 6):S6-8-S6-16.
62. White-Cooper S, Dawkins NU, Kamin SL, Anderson LA. Community- institutional partnerships: Understanding trust among partners. Health Educ Behav. 2009;36:334-347.
63. Minkler M, Vásquez VB, Warner JR, Steussey H, Facente S. Sowin. The seeds for sustainable change: A community-based participatory research partnership for health promotion in Indiana, USA and its aftermath. Health Promot Int. 2006;21:293-300.
64. Roussos ST, Fawcett SB. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:369-402.
65. Parker EA, Israel BA, Robins TG, et al. Evaluation of Community Action Against Asthma: A community health worker intervention to improve children's asthmarelated health by reducing household environmental triggers for asthma. Health Educ Behav. 2008;35:376-395.
66. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. PRC Partnership Trust Tool. http://www.cdc. gov/prc/program-material/partnership-trusttools. htm. Accessed May 7, 2013.
67. Minkler M, Wallerstein N, eds. CBPR for Health: From Process to Outcomes. 2nd ed. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2011.
68. Westfall JM, Mold J, Fagnan L. Practice-based research-"Blue highways" of the NIH roadmap. JAMA. 2007;297:403-406.
69. Wolf SH. The meaning of translational research and why it matters. JAMA. 2008;299:211-213.
70. Dougherty D, Conway PH. The "3T's" road map to transform US health care: The "how" of high-quality care. JAMA. 2008;299:2319-2321.