Inverse mapping of magnetic flux leakage signal for defect characterization

NDT and E International

Volumn 54, Issue , 2013, Pages 198-208

  Mukherjee, Debmalya ^a   Saha, S ^a   Mukhopadhyay, S ^a  

^a BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

Author keywords

Alternate projections; Inverse mapping; Multi resolution framework; Partially timevaryingmodel; System identification; Wavelet transform

Indexed keywords

DEFECTS; IDENTIFICATION (CONTROL SYSTEMS); INVERSE PROBLEMS; MAPPING; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

ALTERNATE PROJECTIONS; DEFECT CHARACTERIZATION; INVERSE MAPPING; MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE; MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE SIGNAL; MINIMUM NORM SOLUTIONS; MULTI-RESOLUTION FRAMEWORK; PARTIALLY TIMEVARYINGMODEL;

MAGNETIC LEAKAGE;

EID: 84885177743     PISSN: 09638695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2012.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Sureshbabu N, Farrell JA. Wavelet-based system identification for nonlinear control. IEEE Trans Autom Control 1999;44(2):412-7.
2. Haykin S. Neural Network: A Comprehensive Foundation. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1999, p. 746-7.
3. Mallat S. A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1989;II(7):674-93.
4. Reis MS. A multiscale empirical modeling framework for system identification. J Process Control 2009;19:1546-57.
5. Paiva HM, Galvao RKH. Wavelet-packet identification of dynamic systems in frequency subbands. Signal Process 2006;86(8):2001-8.
6. Shashidhara HL, Lohani S, Gadre VM. Function learning using wavelet neural networks. Proc IEEE Int Conf Ind Technol 2000;1:335-40.
7. Billings SA, Wei H. A new class of wavelet networks for nonlinear system identification. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 2005;16(4):862-74.
8. Tikaria M, Bahuguna SK, Mukhopadhyay S, Nema S. Wavelet neural network for defect characterization, in: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on IT and Business Intelligence (ITBI-10), November 12-14, Nagpur, India; 2010, isbn:978-81-7446-900-7.
9. Bianchini M, Gori M, Maggini M. On the problem of local minima in recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Networks 1994;5:167-77.
10. Jin T, Que P, Tao Z. Designing and signal processing of intelligent inspection PIG applying magnetic flux leakage methods, International Conference on Intelligent Mechatronics and Automation, Chegdu, China; 2004.
11. Mukhopadhyay S, Srivastava GP. Characterization of metal loss defects from magnetic flux leakage signals with discrete wavelet transform. NDT & E Int 2000;33:57-65.
12. Li Y, Wilson J, Tian GY. Experiment and simulation study for 3D magnetic field sensing for magnetic flux leakage defect characterization. NDT & E Int 2007;40:179-84.
13. Joshi AM. Inverse problems in non-destructive evaluation of gas transmission pipelines using magnetic flux leakage, Ph.D dissertation, Michigan State University; 2006.
14. Voros J. Parametric identification of Wiener systems with multisegment piecewise-linear nonlinearities. Syst Control Lett 2006;56:99-105.
15. Ghanem R, Romeo F. A wavelet-based approach for the identification of linear time-varying dynamical systems. J Sound Vib 2000;234(4):555-76.
16. Berman Z, Baras S. Properties of the multiscale maxima and zero-crossing representation. IEEE Trans Signal Process 1993;41(12):3216-31 December.
17. Bertero M, Boccacci P. Introduction to Inverse Problems in Imaging. Bristol: IOP Publishing; 1998.
18. Nestleroth JB, Bubenik TA. Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) Technology for Natural Gas Pipeline Inspection, the Gas Research Institute, Battelle, . [Online] February 1999.
19. Ljung L. System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall PTR; 1999, p. 8-9.
20. Cvetković Z, Vetterli M. Discrete time wavelet extrema representation: design and consistent reconstruction. IEEE Trans Signal Process 1995;43(3): 681-93 March.
21. Mallat S. Zero-crossings of a wavelet transform. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 1991;37:1019-33 July.
22. Marr D, Hildreth E. Theory of edge detection. Proc R Soc London 1980;207:187-217.
23. Qader IA, Abudayyeh O, Kelly ME. Analysis of edge-detection techniques for crack Identification in bridges. J Comput Civil Eng 2003;17(4):255-64.
24. Mukherjee D. Defect characterization using multi-sensor data, M. Tech dissertation, HBNI, Mumbai, India; 2011.
25. Mallat S, Zhong S. Characterization of signals from multiscale edges. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1992;14(7):710-32 July.
26. Ramirez AR, Mason John SD, Pearson N. Experimental study to differentiate between top and bottom defects for MFL tank floor inspections. NDT & E Int 2009;42(1):16-21.
27. Saha S, Mukhopadhyay S, Mahapatra U, Bhattacharya S, Srivastava GP. Empirical structure for characterizing metal loss defects from radial magnetic flux leakage signal. NDT & E Int 2010;43(6):507-12.