Empirical structure for characterizing metal loss defects from radial magnetic flux leakage signal

NDT and E International

Volumn 43, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 507-512

  Saha, S ^a   Mukhopadhyay, S ^a   Mahapatra, U ^a   Bhattacharya, S ^a   Srivastava, G P ^a  

^a BHABHA ATOMIC RESEARCH CENTRE   (India)

Author keywords

Defect characterization; Magnetic flux leakage; Wavelet transform

Indexed keywords

DEFECT CHARACTERIZATION; MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE; MAGNETIC FLUX LEAKAGE SIGNAL; METAL LOSS DEFECT; OIL PIPELINES; PIPE WALLS; PRIMARY PARAMETERS;

LEAKAGE (FLUID); MAGNETIC STRUCTURE; SIGNAL DETECTION; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

MAGNETIC LEAKAGE;

EID: 77954215789     PISSN: 09638695     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. A.K. Rostamabad, J.P. Reilly, N.K. Nikolova, J.R. Hare, and S. Pasha Machine learning techniques for the analysis of magnetic flux leakage images in pipeline inspection IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 20 2009 10
2. S. Mukhopadhyay, and G.P. Srivastava Characterization of metal loss defects from magnetic flux leakage signals with discrete wavelet transform NDT & E International 33 1 2000 57 65
3. A.A. Carvalhoa, J.M.A. Rebelloa, L.V.S. Sagrilob, C.S. Camerinic, and I.V.J. Miranda MFL signals and artificial neural networks applied to detection and classification of pipe weld defects NDT&E International 2006 661 667 39 2006 661 667
4. J.Y. Lee, A. Muhammad, S. Udpa, L. Udpa, and P. Massopust Hierarchical rule based classification of MFL signals obtained from natural gas pipeline inspection IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Network 5 2000 71 76
5. A. Joshi, L. Udpa, S. Udpa, and A. Tamburinno Adaptive wavelets for characterizing MFL signals from pipeline inspection IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 42 10 2006 3168 3170
6. Hwang K., Mandayam S., Udpa S., and Lord W., Application of wavelet basis function neural networks to NDE. In: Proceedings of 39th Midwest symposium on circuits and systems, Iowa State University, Iowa, USA, vol. 3, 1996. p. 1420.
7. Steinbauer T., The gas research institute's NDE R&D facility and strategy for the future. In: Proceedings of the pipeline pigging and inspection technology conference, Houston, TX, February 1991.
8. H.J.M. Jansen, P.B.J. Van de Camp, and M. Geerdink Magnetisation as a key parameter of magnetic flux leakage pigs for pipeline inspection INSIGHT, British Journal for NDT 36 9 1994 672 677
9. F. Forster New findings in the field of non-destructive magnetic leakage field inspection NDT International 19 1 1986 3 14
10. S. Mukhopadhyay, and A.P. Tiwari Characterization of NDT signals: reconstruction from wavelet transform maximum curvature representation Signal Processing 90 1 2009 261 268
11. X. Chang, and L. Qu Wavelet estimation of partially linear models Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 47 1 2004 31 48
12. S. Saha, S. Mukhopadhyay, S. Bhattacharya, Application of DSP processors in instrumented pipeline inspection gauge data acquisition system. In: National workshop in digital signal processing and its applications in communication control and biomedical engineering, Mumbai, 2006.
13. S. Mallat, and S. Zhong Characterisation of signals from multiscale edges IEEE Transaction on PAMI 14 7 1992 710 732
14. Jiang Q., Sui Q., Lu N., Zachariades P., Wang J., Detection and estimation of oil gas pipeline corrosion defects. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on systems engineering (ICSE 2006), 2006; 1737, ISBN: 1846000130.
15. Mandache C., Shiari B. and Clapham L., Defect separation considerations in magnetic flux leakage inspection Insight. 2005; 47(5).