Practical challenges in integrating genomic data into the electronic health record

Genetics in Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 772-778

  Kho, Abel N ^a   Rasmussen, Luke V ^a   Connolly, John J ^b   Peissig, Peggy L ^c   Starren, Justin ^a   Hakonarson, Hakon ^b,d   Hayes, M Geoffrey ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CHILDREN S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA   (United States)

^c MARSHFIELD CLINIC   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

clinical decision support systems; electronic health records; genetic testing; genomic medicine

Indexed keywords

COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FAMILY HISTORY; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOMICS; HUMAN; INDEL MUTATION; REVIEW; SHORT TANDEM REPEAT; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; GENETIC PRIVACY; GENETIC TESTING; GENETICS, MEDICAL; GENOMICS; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84885167900     PISSN: 10983600     EISSN: 15300366     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/gim.2013.131     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Hsiao CJ, Hing E. Use and characteristics of electronic health record systems among office-based physician practices: United States, 2001-2012. NCHS Data Brief 2012;111:1-8.
2. Murdoch TB, Detsky AS. The inevitable application of big data to health care. JAMA 2013;309:1351-1352.
3. Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The "meaningful use" regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010;363:501-504.
4. Starren J, Williams MS, Bottinger E P. Crossing the omic chasm: a time for omic ancillary systems. JAMA 2013;309:1237-1238.
5. McCarty CA, Chisholm RL, Chute CG, et al.; eMERGE Team. The eMERGE Network: a consortium of biorepositories linked to electronic medical records data for conducting genomic studies. BMC Med Genomics 2011;4:13.
6. Pryor TA, Gardner RM, Clayton PD, Warner HR. The HELP system. J Med Syst 1983;7:87-102.
7. McDonald CJ, Overhage JM, Tierney WM, et al. The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience. Int J Med Inform 1999;54:225-253
8. Stead WW, Brame RG, Hammond WE, Jelovsek FR, Estes EH, Parker RT. A computerized obstetric medical record. Obstet Gynecol 1977;49:502-509
9. Lorenzi NM, Kouroubali A, Detmer DE, Bloomrosen M. How to successfully select and implement electronic health records (EHR) in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2009;9:15
10. Ludwick DA, Doucette J. Adopting electronic medical records in primary care: lessons learned from health information systems implementation experience in seven countries. Int J Med Inform 2009;78:22-31
11. Goetz Goldberg D, Kuzel AJ, Feng LB, DeShazo JP, Love LE. EHRs in primary care practices: benefits, challenges, and successful strategies. Am J Manag Care 2012;18:e48-e54
12. Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT: Health IT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Request for Comments Regarding Meaningful Use Stage 2. 2012
13. Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT: Health IT Policy Committee Meaningful Use Workgroup Request for Comments Regarding Meaningful Use Stage 3. 2012; http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/draft-stage3-rfc-07- nov-12.pdf. Accessed 27 March 2013
14. Kho AN, Pacheco JA, Peissig PL, et al. Electronic medical records for genetic research: results of the eMERGE consortium. Sci Trans Med 2011;3:79re71
15. Voorham J, Denig P. Computerized extraction of information on the quality of diabetes care from free text in electronic patient records of general practitioners J Am Med Inform Assoc 2007;14:349-354
16. Paynter NP, Chasman DI, Paré G, et al. Association between a literature-based genetic risk score and cardiovascular events in women. JAMA 2010;303:631-637
17. Meigs JB, Shrader P, Sullivan LM, et al. Genotype score in addition to common risk factors for prediction of type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2208-2219
18. Acheson LS. Recording, interpreting, and updating the family history of cancer: implications for cancer prevention. JAMA 2011;306:208-210.
19. Murff HJ, Greevy RA, Syngal S. The comprehensiveness of family cancer history assessments in primary care. Community Genet 2007;10:174-180
20. McClure JB, Swan GE, St John J, et al. Pharmacogenetic smoking cessation intervention in a health care setting: a pilot feasibility study. Nicotine Tob Res 2013;15:518-526
21. Price MJ, Berger PB, Teirstein PS, et al.; GRAVITAS Investigators. Standard-vs high-dose clopidogrel based on platelet function testing after percutaneous coronary intervention: the GRAVITAS randomized trial. JAMA 2011;305:1097-1105
22. Cimino JJ. Improving the electronic health record-are clinicians getting what they wished for? JAMA 2013;309:991-992.
23. Overby CL. Opportunities for genomic clinical decision support interventions Genet Med 2013;15:817-823.
24. Mitchell DR, Mitchell JA. Status of clinical gene sequencing data reporting and associated risks for information loss. J Biomed Inform 2007;40:47-54
25. Hoffman MA. The genome-enabled electronic medical record. J Biomed Inform 2007;40:44-46
26. Nippert I, Harris HJ, Julian-Reynier C, et al. Confidence of primary care physicians in their ability to carry out basic medical genetic tasks-a European survey in five countries-Part 1. J Community Genet 2011;2:1-11.
27. Lubin IM, McGovern MM, Gibson Z, et al. Clinician perspectives about molecular genetic testing for heritable conditions and development of a clinician-friendly laboratory report. J Mol Diagn 2009;11:162-171
28. Deshmukh VG, Hoffman MA, Arnoldi C, Bray BE, Mitchell JA. Efficiency of CYP2C9 genetic test representation for automated pharmacogenetic decision support. Methods Inf Med 2009;48:282-290
29. Masys DR, Jarvik GP, Abernethy NF, et al. Technical desiderata for the integration of genomic data into Electronic Health Records. J Biomed Inform 2012;45:419-422
30. Chute CG, Ullman-Cullere M, Wood G, Lin SM, He M, Pathak J. Some experiences and opportunities for big data in translational research. Genet Med 2013;15:802-809
31. Guttmacher AE, Collins FS, Carmona RH. The family history-more important than ever. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2333-2336
32. Acheson LS, Wiesner GL, Zyzanski SJ, Goodwin MA, Stange KC. Family history-taking in community family practice: implications for genetic screening. Genet Med 2000;2:180-185
33. Cohn WF, Ropka ME, Pelletier SL, et al. Health Heritage© a web-based tool for the collection and assessment of family health history: initial user experience and analytic validity. Public Health Genomics 2010;13:477-491
34. Feero WG, Bigley MB, Brinner KM; Family Health History Multi-Stakeholder Workgroup of the American Health Information Community. New standards and enhanced utility for family health history information in the electronic health record: an update from the American Health Information Community's Family Health History Multi-Stakeholder Workgroup. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2008;15:723-728
35. Carmona RH, Wattendorf DJ. Personalizing prevention: the U.S. Surgeon General's Family History Initiative. Am Fam Physician 2005;71:36, 39
36. Whirl-Carrillo M, McDonagh EM, Hebert JM, et al. Pharmacogenomics knowledge for personalized medicine. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2012;92:414-417
37. Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y. Identifying persona genomes by surname inference. Science 2013;339:321-324
38. Darcy DC, Lewis ET, Ormond KE, Clark DJ, Trafton JA. Practica considerations to guide development of access controls and decision support for genetic information in electronic medical records. BMC Health Serv Res 2011;11:294
39. ManolioTA, Chisholm RL, Ozenberger B, et al. Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: the future is here. Genet Med 2013;15:258-267
40. Executive Office of the President Office of Management and Budget. Revisions to the standards for the classification of federal data on race and ethnicity. In Register F (ed). Vol. 621997:58781-58790
41. World Health Organization. International Classification of Disease (ICD). 2013; http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/. Accessed 23 April 2013
42. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organisation SNOMED CT 2013; http://www.ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/. Accessed 19 Apri 2013
43. American Medical Association. CPT-Current Procedural Terminology 2013; http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/solutions-managing-your- practice/coding-billing-insurance/cpt.page. Accessed 22 April 2013
44. U.S. National Library of Medicine. RxNorm Overview. 2013; http://www.nlm nih.gov/research/umls/rxnorm/overview.html#
45. Forrey AW, McDonald CJ, DeMoor G, et al. Logical observation identifier names and codes (LOINC) database: a public use set of codes and names for electronic reporting of clinical laboratory test results. Clin Chem 1996;42:81-90
46. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. DICOM Homepage. 2013; http://medical.nema.org/. Accessed 23 April 2013
47. Radiological Society of North America. http://www.rsna.org/RadLex.aspx Accessed 22 April 2013