From exotic to mainstream: A 10-year odyssey from internet speed to boundary spanning with scrum

Agile Software Development: Current Research and Future Directions

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 87-110

  Baskerville, Richard ^a   Pries Heje, Jan ^b   Madsen, Sabine ^b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ROSKILDE UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885149400     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12575-1_5     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Abrahamsson, P., Conboy, K., & Xiaofeng, W. (2009). 'Lots done, more to do': The current state of agile systems development research. European Journal of Information Systems, 18(4), 281-284.
2. Atlanta-Constitution. (2001, February 19). Internet growing by leaps and bytes: Study says americans trek to Cyberspace Is now a stampede. The Atlanta Constitution, pp. A1, A9.
3. Baskerville, R., Levine, L., Pries-Heje, J., Ramesh, B., & Slaughter, S. (2003). Is Internet-speed software development different? IEEE Software, 20(6), 70-77.
4. Baskerville, R., & Pries-Heje, J. (2001). Racing the e-bomb: How the Internet is redefining information systems development methodology. Proceedings of the IFIP TC8/WG8.2 Working Conference on Realigning Research and Practice in Information Systems Development: The Social and Organizational Perspective, 49-68.
5. Baskerville, R., & Pries-Heje, J. (2002). Information systems development @ Internet speed: A new paradigm in the making. In S. Wrycza (Ed.), Proceedings of the Tenth European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 282-291). Gdansk: University of Gdansk.
6. Baskerville, R., & Pries-Heje, J. (2004). Short cycle time systems development. Information Systems Journal, 14(2), 237-264.
7. Beck, K. (2000). Extreme programming explained: Embrace change. Addison-Wesley.
8. Beck, K., & Fowler, M. (2001). Planning extreme programming. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
9. Boehm, B. (2002). Get ready for agile methods, with care. IEEE Computer, 35(1), 64-69.
10. Boehm, B., & Turner, R. (2004). Balancing agility and discipline: A guide for the perplexed. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
11. Cockburn, A. (2002). Learning from agile software development-Part one and two. Crosstalk-The journal of Defence Software Engineering (September and October).
12. Cox, A. (2005). What are communities of practice? A comparative review of four seminal works. Journal of Information Science, 31(6), 527-540.
13. Crosby, P. B. (1980). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. New York: New American Library.
14. Cusumano, M., & Selby, R. (1995). Microsoft secrets: How the world's most powerful company creates technology, shapes markets and manages people. New York: Free Press.
15. Cusumano, M., & Yoffie, D. (2000). Competing on Internet time: Lessons from Netscape and its battle with Microsoft. New York: Touchstone.
16. Dybå, T., & Dingsøyr, T. (2008). Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information & Software Technology, 50(9-10), 833-859.
17. Iansiti, M., & McCormack, A. (1997). Developing products on Internet time. Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 108-117.
18. Jeffries, R., Anderson, A., & Hendrickson, C. (2001). Extreme programming installed. Boston: Addison-Wesley.
19. Levina, N., & Vaast, E. (2005). The Emergence of boundary spanning competence in practice: Implications for implementation and use of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 335-363.
20. Orlikowski, W. (1993). CASE tools as organizational change: Investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development. MIS Quarterly, 17(3), 309-340.
21. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Levine, L., & Ramesh, B. (2005). The High Speed balancing game: How software companies cope with Internet speed. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 16, 11-54.
22. Rising, L., & Janoff, N. S. (2000). The Scrum software development process for small teams. IEEE Software(July/Aug), 26-32.
23. Smith, P. G., & Reinertsen, D. G. (1995). Developing products in half the time (2nd Ed.). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
24. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387-420.
25. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage.
26. Urquhart, C. (1997). Exploring analyst-client communication: Using grounded theory techniques to investigate interaction in informal requirements gathering. In A. S. Lee, J. Liebenau & J. I. DeGross (Eds.), Information Systems and Qualitative Research (pp. 149-181). London: Chapman and Hall.
27. Urquhart, C. (2000). Strategies for conversation and systems analysis in requirements gathering: A qualitative view of analyst-client communication. The Qualitative Report (On-line serial), 4(1).