The effects of the antibiotics ampicillin, florfenicol, sulfamethazine, and tylosin on biogas production and their degradation efficiency during anaerobic digestion

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 149, Issue , 2013, Pages 244-252

  Mitchell, Shannon M ^a   Ullman, Jeffrey L ^b   Teel, Amy L ^a   Watts, Richard J ^a   Frear, Craig ^c  

^a Washington State University   (United States)

^b J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anaerobic digestion; Antibiotic degradation; Biogas; Methane

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOGAS; DEGRADATION; EFFLUENTS; METHANE;

ANTIBIOTIC CONCENTRATION; ANTIBIOTIC DEGRADATION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; BIOGAS PRODUCTION RATES; DEGRADATION EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS; TRANSFORMATION PRODUCTS; TREATMENT EFFICIENCY;

ANTIBIOTICS;

3,5 DICHLOROPHENOL; AMPICILLIN; BIOGAS; FLORFENICOL; SULFADIMIDINE; TYLOSIN;

ALCOHOL; ANOXIC CONDITIONS; ANTIBIOTICS; BIODEGRADATION; BIOGAS; EFFLUENT; GAS PRODUCTION; MANURE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABILITY; BIODEGRADATION; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOREACTOR; BIOTRANSFORMATION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; DEWATERING; EFFLUENT; INHIBITION KINETICS; INOCULATION; MANURE; PH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ANIMALIA;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ANTIBIOTIC DEGRADATION; BIOGAS; METHANE;

AMPICILLIN; ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMALS; ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BIOFUELS; BIOREACTORS; CATTLE; CHLOROPHENOLS; CHROMATOGRAPHY, LIQUID; MANURE; SPECTROMETRY, MASS, ELECTROSPRAY IONIZATION; SULFAMETHAZINE; THIAMPHENICOL; TYLOSIN;

EID: 84885102437     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: 18732976     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.048     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Alvarez J.A., Otero L., Lema J.M., Omil F. The effect and fate of antibiotics during the anaerobic digestion of pig manure. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:8581-8586.
2. Arikan O.A. Degradation and metabolization of chlortetracycline during the anaerobic digestion of manure from medicated calves. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 158:485-490.
3. Brain R.A., Johnson D.J., Richards S.M., Sanderson H., Sibley P.K., Solomon K.R. Effects of 25 pharmaceutical compounds to Lemna gibba using a seven-day static-renewal test. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23:371-382.
4. Bryskier A. Antimicrobial Agents: Antibacterials and Antifungals 2005, American Society of Microbiology (ASM) Press, Washington, DC.
5. Chelliapan S., Wilby T., Sallis P.J., Yuzir A. Tolerance of the antibiotic tylosin on treatment performance of an up-flow anaerobic stage reactor (UASR). Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 63:1599-1606.
6. Ding C., He J.Z. Effect of antibiotics in the environment on microbial populations. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87:925-941.
7. Frear C., Liao W., Ewing T., Chen S. Evaluation of co-digestion at a commercial dairy anaerobic digester. Clean: Water, Air, Soil 2011, 39:697-704.
8. Gartiser S., Urich E., Alexy R., Kümmerer K. Anaerobic inhibition and biodegradation of antibiotics in ISO test schemes. Chemosphere 2007, 66:1839-1848.
9. Hu D., Coats J.R. Aerobic degradation and photolysis of tylosin in water and soil. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26:884-889.
10. ISO, 2003. ISO. 13641-1,2: Water Quality - Determination of Inhibition of Gas Production of Anaerobic Bacteria. International Organization for Standardization.
11. ISO, 1995. ISO. 11734: Water Quality - Evaluation of the "ultimate" Anaerobic Biodegradability of Organic Compounds in Digested Sludge. International Organization for Standardization.
12. Kolpin D.W., Furlong E.T., Meyer M.T., Thurman E.M., Zaugg S.D., Barber L.B., Buxton H.T. Pharmaceuticals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in U.S. streams, 1999-2000: a national reconnaissance. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36:1202-1211.
13. Kolz A.C., Moorman T.B., Ong S.K., Scoggin K.D., Douglass E.A. Degradation and metabolite production of tylosin in anaerobic and aerobic swine-manure lagoons. Water Environ. Res. 2005, 77:49-56.
14. Kumar K., Gupta S.C., Chander Y., Singh A.K. Antibiotic use in agriculture and its impact on the terrestrial environment. Adv. Agron. 2005, 87:1-54.
15. Labatut R.A., Angenent L.T., Scott N.R. Biochemical methane potential and biodegradability of complex organic substrates. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:2255-2264.
16. Lallai A., Mura G., Onnis N. The effects of certain antibiotics on biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of pig waste slurry. Bioresour. Technol. 2002, 82:205-208.
17. Ma J., Frear C., Wang Z., Yu L., Zhao Q., Li X., Chen S. A simple methodology for rate-limiting step determination for anaerobic digestion of complex substrates and effect of microbial community ratio. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 134:391-395.
18. Ma J., Zhao B., Frear C., Zhao Q., Yu L., Li X., Chen S. Methanosarcina domination in anaerobic sequencing batch reactor at short hydraulic retention time. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 137:41-50.
19. Massey L.B., Haggard B.E., Galloway J.M., Loftin K.A., Meyer M.T., Green W.R. Antibiotic fate and transport in three effluent-dominated Ozark streams. Ecol. Eng. 2010, 36:930-938.
20. Merck, 2012. The Merck Veterinary Manual. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ. <> (accessed September 2011). http://www.merckmanuals.com/vet/index.html.
21. Mohring S.A.I., Strzysch I., Fernandes M.R., Kiffmeyer T.K., Tuerk J., Hamscher G. Degradation and elimination of various sulfonamides during anaerobic fermentation: a promising step on the way to sustainable pharmacy?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:2569-2574.
22. Murray P.R., Baron E.J., Pfaller M.A., Tenover F.C., Yolken R.H. Manual of Clinical Microbiology 1999, American Society of Microbiology (ASM) Press, Washington, DC. seventh ed.
23. Sassman S.A., Sarmah A.K., Lee L.S. Sorption of tylosin A, D, and A-aldol and degradation of tylosin A in soils. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2007, 26:1629-1635.
24. Shi J.C., Liao X.D., Wu Y.B., Liang J.B. Effect of antibiotics on methane arising from anaerobic digestion of pig manure. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166-167:457-463.
25. Subbiah M., Mitchell S.M., Ullman J.L., Call D.R. β-Lactams and florfenicol antibiotics remain bioactive in soils while ciprofloxacin, neomycin, and tetracycline are neutralized. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77:7255-7260.
26. Subbiah M., Shah D.H., Besser T.E., Ullman J.L., Call D.R. Urine from treated cattle drives selection for cephalosporin resistant Escherichia coli in soil. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:1-8.
27. Teeter J.S., Meyerhoff R.D. Aerobic degradation of tylosin in cattle, chicken, and swine excreta. Environ. Res. 2003, 93:45-51.
28. Testa B., Mayer J.M. Hydrolysis in Drug and Prodrug Metabolism 2003, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, Federal Republic of Germany. first ed.
29. US EPA, 2008. Estimation Program Interface (EPI) Suite Version 4.1. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. <> (accessed May 2013). http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/exposure/pubs/episuite.htm.
30. US EPA, 2006. Market Opportunities for Biogas Recovery Systems - A Guide to Identifying Candidates for On-farm and Centralized Systems. EPA-430-8-06-004. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. <> (accessed June 2013). http://www.renewwisconsin.org/biogas/AD/AgStar%20Market%20Ops%20Biogas%20Recovery%20Systems.pdf.
31. US FDA, 2012. Drug Use Review. US Food and Drug Administration. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Washington, DC. <> (accessed December 2012). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/InformationbyDrugClass/UCM319435.pdf.
32. US FDA, 2009. Summary report on antimicrobials sold or distributed for use in food-producing animals. US Food and Drug Administration. Center for Veterinary Medicine, Washington, DC. <> (accessed January 2013). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/ForIndustry/UserFees/AnimalDrugUserFeeActADUFA/UCM231851.pdf.
33. US NLM, 2012. TOXNET: Toxicology Data Network. US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD. <> (accessed June 2013). http://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/.
34. Yates, J.A., Tuomari, D.L., Kreider, C., 1996. Environmental Assessment for the Use of Nuflor Injectable Solution in Cattle. Applicant: Schering Plough Animal Health, Kenilworth, NJ. <> (accessed April 2013). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/animalveterinary/developmentapprovalprocess/environmentalassessments/ucm072358.pdf.
35. Zhao, L., Ball, C.H., 2009. Determination of Chloramphenicol, Flofenicol, and Thiamphenicol in Honey Using Agilent SampliQ OPT Solid-phase Extraction Cartridges and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Agilent Technologies, Inc., Wilmington, DE. <> (accessed June 2013). http://www.chem.agilent.com/Library/applications/5990-3615EN.pdf.