Life after stoma creation

Danish Medical Journal

Volumn 60, Issue 10, 2013, Pages

  Danielsen, Anne Kjærgaard ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; INTERVIEW; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PREVALENCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; STOMA; SUPPORT GROUP; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNCERTAINTY; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADULT; COST; ECONOMICS; ENTEROSTOMY; LIFESTYLE; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; REVIEW;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; ENTEROSTOMY; HUMANS; LIFE STYLE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURGICAL STOMAS;

EID: 84885082288     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22451919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. Thorpe G, McArthur M, Richardson B. Bodily change following faecal stoma formation: qualitative interpretive synthesis. J Adv Nurs 2009; 65: 1778-89.
2. Balleby L, Andersen BD, Schmidt DS, Christensen BM. Stomidatabasen i Region Hovedstaden. 2011 p. 1-41.
3. Brown H, Randle J. Living with a stoma: a review of the literature. J Clin Nurs 2005; 14: 74-81.
4. Shabbir J, Britton DC. Stoma complications: a literature overview. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 958-64.
5. Gögenur I, Wittendorff H-E, Colstrup H, Rosenberg J, Fischer A. Følger efter behandling af kolorektal cancer med særlig fokus på stomiproblemer, urologiske følgetilstande og seksuel dysfunktion[Effects of treatment of colorectal cancer focusing on stoma related problems, urologic problems and sexual dysfunction]. Ugeskr Laeger 2005; 167: 4272-3.
6. Salvadalena G. Incidence of complications of the stoma and peristomal skin among individuals with colostomy, ileostomy, and urostomy: a systematic review. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2008; 35: 596-9.
7. Grant M, McMullen CK, Altschuler A, Mohler MJ, Hornbrook MC, Herrinton LJ, et al. Gender differences in quality of life among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Oncol Nurs Forum 2011; 38: 587-96.
8. Ma N, Harvey J, Stewart J, Andrews L, Hill AG. The effect of age on the quality of life of patients living with stomas: a pilot study. ANZ J Surg 2007; 77: 883-5.
9. Sprangers MA, Taal BG, Aaronson NK, Te Velde A. Quality of life in colorectal cancer. Stoma vs. nonstoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 361-9.
10. Hwang JM, Varma MG. Surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 2678-90.
11. Siassi M, Weiss M, Hohenberger W, Lösel F, Matzel K. Personality rather than clinical variables determines quality of life after major colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 662-8.
12. Holzer B, Matzel K, Schiedeck T, Christiansen J, Christensen P, Rius J, et al. Do geographic and educational factors influence the quality of life in rectal cancer patients with a permanent colostomy? Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 2209-16.
13. Nichols TR, Riemer M. The impact of stabilizing forces on postsurgical recovery in ostomy patients. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2008; 35: 316-20.
14. Altschuler A, Ramirez M, Grant M, Wendel C, Hornbrook MC, Herrinton L, et al. The influence of husbands' or male partners' support on women's psychosocial adjustment to having an ostomy resulting from colorectal cancer. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2009; 36: 299-305.
15. Kald A, Juul KN, Hjortsvang H, Sjödahl RI. Quality of life is impaired in patients with peristomal bulging of a sigmoid colostomy. Scand J Gastroenterol 2008; 43: 627-33.
16. Scheidbach H, Ptok H, Schubert D, Kose D, Hügel O, Gastinger I, et al. Palliative stoma creation: comparison of laparoscopic vs conventional procedures. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2009; 394: 371-4.
17. Carlsson E, Bosaeus I, Nordgren S. Quality of life and concerns in patients with short bowel syndrome. Clin Nutr 2003; 22: 445-52.
18. Bloemen JG, Visschers RGJ, Truin W, Beets GL, Konsten JLM. Long-term quality of life in patients with rectal cancer: association with severe postoperative complications and presence of a stoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1251-8.
19. Colquhoun P, Kaiser R, Efron J, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Vernava AM, et al. Is the quality of life better in patients with colostomy than patients with fecal incontience? World J Surg 2006; 30: 1925-8.
20. Krouse R, Grant M, Ferrell B, Dean G, Nelson R, Chu D. Quality of life outcomes in 599 cancer and non-cancer patients with colostomies. J Surg Res 2007; 138: 79-87.
21. Leech NL, Onwuegbuzie AJ. A typology of mixed methods research designs. Qual Quant 2007; 43: 265-75.
22. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Choosing a mixed methods design. Designing and conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Sage Publications Ltd; 2011. p. 53-106.
23. Creswell JW. Editorial: Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research. J Mix Methods Res 2008; 3: 95-108.
24. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. The nature of mixed methods research. Designing and conducting Mixed Methods Research. 2nd ed. Sage Publications Ltd; 2011. p. 1-18.
25. Groenkjaer M. Alcohol use in Denmark: a mixed methods study on drinking contexts and the culture of alcohol use from a public health perspective. Faculty of Health Sciences, Aarhus University; 2011. p. 1-89.
26. Turnbull GB, Erwin-Toth P. Ostomy care: foundation for teaching and practice. Ostomy Wound Manage 1999; 45: 23-32.
27. Perrin A. Know how. Going home after stoma surgery. Community Nurse 1999; 5: 26-7.
28. Doughty D. Role of the enterostomal therapy nurse in ostomy patient rehabilitation. Cancer 1992; 70: 1390-2.
29. The Danish Ostomy Association COPA [Internet]. Available from: http://www. copa. dk/andet/copa-in-english/, cited Oct 10, 2012.
30. Fagligt Selskab for sygeplejersker i stomiplejen [Professional association for nurses in stoma care] [Internet]. Available from: http://www2. dsr. dk/msite/frontpage. asp?id=69, cited Dec 10, 2012.
31. Karadaǧ A, Menteş BB, Uner A, Irkörücü O, Ayaz S, Ozkan S. Impact of stomatherapy on quality of life in patients with permanent colostomies or ileostomies. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003; 18: 234-8.
32. Colwell JC, Gray M. Does preoperative teaching and stoma site marking affect surgical outcomes in patients undergoing ostomy surgery? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2007; 34: 492-6.
33. Wade BE. Colostomy patients: psychological adjustment at 10 weeks and 1 year after surgery in districts which employed stoma-care nurses and districts which did not. J Adv Nurs 1990; 15: 1297-304.
34. Marquis P, Marrel A, Jambon B. Quality of life in patients with stomas: the Montreux Study. Ostomy Wound Manage 2003; 49: 48-55.
35. Persson E, Gustavsson B, Hellström A-L, Lappas G, Hultén L. Ostomy patients' perceptions of quality of care. J Adv Nurs 2005; 49: 51-8.
36. Ross L, Abild-Nielsen AG, Thomsen BL, Karlsen R V, Boesen EH, Johansen C. Quality of life of Danish colorectal cancer patients with and without a stoma. Support Care Cancer 2007; 15: 505-13.
37. Vallgårda S. Forebyggelse i sundhedsvæsenet-muligheder og begrænsninger [Prevention in health care-opportunities and limitations]. Ugeskr Laeger 2010; 172: 798-800.
38. Ekholm O, Kjøller M, Davidsen M, Hesse U, Eriksen L, Illemann Christensen A, et al. Sundhed og sygelighed i Danmark & udviklingen siden 1987[Health and disease in Denmark, and the development since 1987]. 2006. p. 1-305.
39. Lorig KR, Ritter P, Stewart AL, Sobel DS, Brown BW, Bandura A, et al. Chronic disease self-management program: 2-year health status and health care utilization outcomes. Med Care 2001; 39: 1217-23.
40. Rigotti NA, Munafo MR, Stead LF. Interventions for smoking cessation in hospitalised patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007 Jan; (3): CD001837.
41. Pino C, Boutron I, Ravaud P. Outcomes in registered, ongoing randomized controlled trials of patient education. PloS One 2012; 7: e42934.
42. Marthedal AB, Johansen KS, Nielsen A, Hansen AR, Hansen MB. Lære at leve med kronisk sygdom. Evaluering af ydbytte, selvvurderet effekt og rekruttering. 2011 p. 1-100.
43. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Plant K. A disease-specific self-help program compared with a generalized chronic disease self-help program for arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 53: 950-7.
44. Eisner D, Zoller M, Rosemann T, Huber CA, Badertscher N, Tandjung R. Screening and prevention in Swiss primary care: a systematic review. Int J Gen Med 2011; 4: 853-70.
45. Nodhturft V, Schneider JM, Hebert P, Bradham DD, Bryant M, Phillips M, et al. Chronic disease selfmanagement: improving health outcomes. Nurs Clin North Am 2000; 35: 507-18.
46. Lorig KR, Sobel DS, Stewart AL, Brown BW, Bandura A, Ritter P, et al. Evidence suggesting that a chronic disease self-management program can improve health status while reducing hospitalization: a randomized trial. Med Care 1999; 37: 5-14.
47. Johansson K, Leino-Kilpi H, Salanterä S, Lehtikunnas T, Ahonen P, Elomaa L, et al. Need for change in patient education: a Finnish survey from the patient's perspective. Patient Educ Couns 2003; 51: 239-45.
48. Rankinen S, Salanterä S, Heikkinen K, Johansson K, Kaljonen A, Virtanen H, et al. Expectations and received knowledge by surgical patients. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 113-9.
49. Mensing CR, Norris SL. Group Education in Diabetes: Effectiveness and Implementation. Diabetes Spectr 2003; 16: 96-103.
50. Altuntas YE, Kement M, Gezen C, Eker HH, Aydin H, Sahin F, et al. The role of group education on quality of life in patients with a stoma. Eur J Cancer Care 2012; 21: 776-8.
51. Reif K, De Vries U, Petermann F, Görres S. A patient education program is effective in reducing cancerrelated fatigue: A multi-centre randomised two-group waiting-list controlled intervention trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2012: in press.
52. Krahn G, Campbell VA. Evolving views of disability and public health: the roles of advocacy and public health. Disabil Health J 2011; 4: 12-8.
53. Sprangers M a G. Disregarding clinical trial-based patient-reported outcomes is unwarranted: Five advances to substantiate the scientific stringency of quality-of-life measurement. Acta Oncol 2010; 49: 155-63.
54. Wilson IB, Cleary PD. Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 1995; 273: 59-65.
55. Wahl AK, Hanestad BR. Måling av livskvalitet i klinisk praksis [Measurement of quality of life in clinical practice]. Bergen, Norway: Fagbokforlaget; 2004. p. 1-156.
56. Nugent KP, Daniels P, Stewart B, Patankar R, Johnson CD. Quality of life in stoma patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1569-74.
57. Camilleri-Brennan J, Steele RJC. Prospective analysis of quality of life after reversal of a defunctioning loop ileostomy. Colorectal Dis 2002; 4: 167-71.
58. Pachler J, Wille-Jørgensen P. Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Rreviews 2005 Jan; (2): CD004323.
59. Hamashima C. Long-term quality of life of postoperative rectal cancer patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 17: 571-6.
60. Vironen JH, Kairaluoma M, Aalto A-M, Kellokumpu IH. Impact of functional results on quality of life after rectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 568-78.
61. Manderson L. Boundary breaches: the body, sex and sexuality after stoma surgery. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61: 405-15.
62. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet 2001; 358: 483-8.
63. Danielsen AK, Spanager L. Anvendelse af fokusgruppeinterview inden for sundhedsvidenskab [The use of focus group interviewing within health sciences]. Ugeskr Laeger 2012; 174: 1298-302.
64. Carlsen B, Glenton C. What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011; 11: 1-10.
65. Hyden L-C, Bulow P. Who's talking: drawing conclusions from focus groups-some methodological considerations. Int J Soc Res Methodol 2003; 6: 305-21.
66. Stige B, Malterud K, Midtgarden T. Toward an agenda for evaluation of qualitative research. Qual Health Res 2009; 19: 1504-16.
67. Goss GL. Focus group interviews: a methodology for socially sensitive research. Clin Excell Nurse Pract 1998; 2: 30-4.
68. Hammersley M, Atkinson P. The process of analysis. In: Hammersley M, Atkinson P, editors. Ethnography. 3rd ed. Routledge; 2007. p. 158-90.
69. Delmar C. "Generalizability" as Recognition: Reflections on a Foundational Problem in Qualitative Research. Qual Res 2010; 1: 115-28.
70. Polit DF, Beck CT. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Stud 2010; 47: 1451-8.
71. Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today 2004; 24: 105-12.
72. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P. Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2007; 7: 1-6.
73. Kramer JR, Bayless ML, Lorenzi GM, Ziegler GK, Larkin ME, Lackaye ME, et al. Participant characteristics and study features associated with high retention rates in a longitudinal investigation of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clin Trials 2012: in press.
74. McCambridge J, Kalaitzaki E, White IR, Khadjesari Z, Murray E, Linke S, et al. Impact of length or relevance of questionnaires on attrition in online trials: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: e96.
75. Hutchings A, Neuburger J, Grosse Frie K, Black N, Van der Meulen J. Factors associated with non-response in routine use of patient reported outcome measures after elective surgery in England. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012; 10: 1-8.
76. Pieper B. Who is being missed in ostomy research? J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 1996; 23: 205-9.
77. Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald HP, Yao X. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008 Jan; (2): CD000011.
78. De las Cuevas C. Towards a clarification of terminology in medicine taking behavior: compliance, adherence and concordance are related although different terms with different uses. Curr Clin Pharmacol 2011; 6: 74-7.
79. Wills CE. Review: evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to improve patient adherence to prescribed medications is limited. Evid Based Nurs 2008; 11: 109.
80. Adams RJ. Improving health outcomes with better patient understanding and education. Risk Manag Healthc Policy 2010; 3: 61-72.
81. Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD. Cost-effectiveness analysis in surgery. Surgery 1998; 123: 151-6.
82. Van den Hout WB, Van den Brink M, Stiggelbout AM, Van de Velde CJH, Kievit J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer treatments. Eur J Cancer 2002; 38: 953-63.
83. Drummond M, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O'Brien BJ, Stoddart GL. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 3. ed. Oxford University Press; 2005.
84. Moeller Pedersen K, Wittrup-Jensen K, Brooks R, Gudex C. The QUALY-study. Questionnaires, planning and performance. Værdisætning af sundhed. Teorien om kvalitetsjusterede leveår og en dansk anvendelse [Valuation of health. The theory of quality adjusted life years and a Danish application]. Syddansk Universitetsforlag; 2003. p. 1-255.
85. Sørensen J, Davidsen M, Gudex C, Pedersen KM, Brønnum-Hansen H. Danish EQ-5D population norms. Scand J Public Health 2009; 37: 467-74.
86. Toennesen H, Søndergaard L, Joergensen T, Overgaard D, Kristensen I, Barfod S, et al. Terminologi. Forebyggelse, sundhedsfremme og folkesundhed. 2005. p. 1-60.
87. Rasmussen C, Stausholm Knudsen M, Bekker Hansen B, Lindquist R-M. Costs related to biological treatment of RA [Omkostninger til biologisk behandling af leddegigt]. Ugeskr Laeger 2009; 171: 1585-1590.
88. Goossens ME, Rutten-van Mölken MP, Vlaeyen JW, Van der Linden SM. The cost diary: a method to measure direct and indirect costs in cost-effectiveness research. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 688-95.
89. Cakmak A, Aylaz G, Kuzu MA. Permanent stoma not only affects patients' quality of life but also that of their spouses. World J Surg 2010; 34: 2872-6.
90. Northouse LL, Schafer JA, Tipton J, Metivier L. The concerns of patients and spouses after the diagnosis of colon cancer: a qualitative analysis. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 1999; 26: 8-17.
91. Zhang J-E, Wong FK, You LM, Zheng MC. A qualitative study exploring the nurse telephone follow-up of patients returning home with a colostomy. J Clin Nurs 2012; 21: 1407-15.
92. Dale J, Caramlau IO, Lindenmeyer A, Williams SM. Peer support telephone calls for improving health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008; (4): CD006903.
93. Burckhardt CS. The Ostomy Adjustment Scale: further evidence of reliability and validity. Rehabil Psychol 1990; 35: 149-55.
94. Olbrisch ME. Development and validation of the Ostomy Adjustment Scale. Rehabil Psychol 1983; 28: 3-12.