Appreciating the complexity of project management execution: Using simulation in the classroom

Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 323-334

  Hartman, Nathan S ^a   Watts, Charles A ^b   Treleven, Mark D ^b  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Operations management; Teaching approaches; Teaching using games; Technology and innovation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885081417     PISSN: 15404595     EISSN: 15404609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dsji.12016     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Austin, R. D. (2009). Project management simulation: Scope, resources, schedule. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Publishing.
2. Baldwin, T. T., Pierce, J. R., Joines, R. C., & Farouk, S. (2011). The elusiveness of applied management knowledge: A critical challenge for management educators. Academy Of Management Learning & Education, 10(4), 583-605.
3. Brooks, Jr., F. P. (1995). The mythical man-month: Essays on software engineering, 20th anniversary edition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 322 p.
4. de Jong, T., & Ferguson-Hessler, M. (1996). Types and qualities of knowledge. Educational Psychologist, 31(2), 105-113.
5. Hanisch, B., & Wald, A. (2012). A bibliometric view on the use of contingency theory in project management research. Project Management Journal, 43(3), 4-23.
6. Heineke, J., Meile, L., Liu, L., & Davies, J. (2010). Project flip: a project management case/exercise experience. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8(1), 113-127.
7. Heldman, K. (2011). PMP®: Project management professional exam study guide (7th ed.). Indianapolis, IN: John Wiley & Sons.
8. Jalkala, A., Cova, B., Salle, R., & Salminen, R. T. (2010). Changing project business orientations: towards a new logic of project marketing. European Management Journal, 28(2), 124-138.
9. Larson, E. W. & Gray C. F. (2011). Project management: The managerial process. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.