The Opportunity challenge: A benchmark database for on-body sensor-based activity recognition

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volumn 34, Issue 15, 2013, Pages 2033-2042

  Chavarriaga, Ricardo ^a   Sagha, Hesam ^a   Calatroni, Alberto ^b   Digumarti, Sundara Tejaswi ^a   Tröster, Gerhard ^b   Millán, José Del R ^a   Roggen, Daniel ^b  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Activity recognition; Body sensor networks; Machine learning; Metrics; Performance evaluation; ROC analysis

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BENCHMARKING; BODY SENSOR NETWORKS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS; PATTERN RECOGNITION; WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY;

ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; BASE-LINE PERFORMANCE; CLASSIFICATION TECHNIQUE; HUMAN ACTIVITY RECOGNITION; MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES; METRICS; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; ROC ANALYSIS;

WEARABLE SENSORS;

EID: 84885071495     PISSN: 01678655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patrec.2012.12.014     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Banos, O., Calatroni, A., Damas, M., Pomaras, H., Rojas, I., Sagha, H., Millán, J.d.R., Tröster, G., Chavarriaga, R., Roggen, D., 2012. Kinect=IMU? Learning MIMO signal mappings to automatically translate activity recognition systems across sensor modalities. In: Internat. Symposium on Wearable Computers. pp. 92-99.
2. Blankertz, B., Müller, K.R., Krusienski, D., Schalk, G., Wolpaw, J.R., Schlögl, A., Pfurtscheller, G., Millán, J.d.R., Schröder, M., Birbaumer, N., 2006. The BCI competition III: Validating alternative approaches to actual BCI problems. IEEE Trans. Neural Systems Rehabil. Eng. 14, 153-159. (Pubitemid 44150230)
3. Calatroni, A., Roggen, D., Tröster, G., 2011. Collection and curation of a large reference dataset for activity recognition. In: IEEE Internat. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2011. pp. 30-35.
4. Chang, C.C., Lin, C.J., 2011. LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Systems Technol. 2, 27:1-27:27.
5. Chavarriaga, R., Bayati, H., Millán, J., 2012. Unsupervised adaptation for acceleration-based activity recognition: Robustness to sensor displacement and rotation. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. doi:10.1007/s00779-011-0493- y.
6. Everingham, M., Gool, L., Williams, C.K., Winn, J., Zisserman, A., 2010. The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge. Internat. J. Comput. Vision 88, 303-338.
7. Fawcett, T., 2006. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Lett. 27, 861-874.
8. Giuberti, M., Ferrari, G., 2011. Simple and robust BSN-based activity classification: Winning the first BSN contest. In: Proc. 4th Internat. Symposium on Applied Sciences in Biomedical and Communication Technologies (ISABEL), Barcelona, Spain. pp. 34:1-34:5.
9. Guyon, I., Athitsos, V., 2011. Demonstrations and live evaluation for the gesture recognition challenge. In: IEEE Internat. Conf. on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCV Workshops), 2011. pp. 461-462.
10. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H., 2009. The WEKA data mining software: An update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11, 10-18.
11. Huynh, T., Fritz, M., Schiele, B., 2008. Discovery of activity patterns using topic models. In: Proc. 10th Internat. Conf. on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 10-19.
12. Intille, S., Larson, K., Tapia, E., Beaudin, J., Kaushik, P., Nawyn, J., Rockinson, R., 2006 Using a live-in laboratory for ubiquitous computing research. In: Proc. Internat. Conf. on Pervasive Computing. pp. 349-365. (Pubitemid 44044768)
13. van Kasteren, T., Noulas, A., Englebienne, G., Kröse, B., 2008. Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In: Proc. 10th Internat. Conf. on Ubiquitous Computing. ACM Press, pp. 1-9.
14. Kawaguchi, N., Ogawa, N., Iwasaki, Y., Kaji, K., Terada, T., Murao, K., Inoue, S., Kawahara, Y., Sumi, Y., Nishio, N., 2011. HASC challenge: Gathering large scale human activity corpus for the real-world activity understandings. In: Proc. 2nd Augmented Human Internat. Conf.. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 27:1-27:5.
15. Pirkl, G., Stockinger, K., Kunze, K., Lukowicz, P., 2008. Adapting magnetic resonant coupling based relative positioning technology for wearable activitiy recogniton. In: 12th IEEE Internat. Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2008 ISWC 2008. pp. 47-54.
16. Preece, S.J., Goulermas, J.Y., Kenney, L.P.J., Howard, D., Meijer, K., Crompton, R., 2009 Activity identification using body-mounted sensors - A review of classification techniques. Physiol. Meas. 30, R1.
17. Roggen, D., Calatroni, A., Rossi, M., Holleczek, T., Förster, K., Tröster, G., Lukowicz, P., Bannach, D., Pirkl, G., Ferscha, A., Doppler, J., Holzmann, C., Kurz, M., Holl, G., Chavarriaga, R., Sagha, H., Bayati, H., Creatura, M., Millán, J.R., 2010. Collecting complex activity data sets in highly rich networked sensor environments. In: Seventh Internat. Conf. on Networked Sensing Systems. pp. 233-240.
18. Rohrbach, M., Amin, S., Andriluka, M., Schiele, B., 2012. A database for fine grained activity detection of cooking activities. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE, pp. 1194-1201.
19. Saar-Tsechansky, M., Provost, F., 2007. Handling missing values when applying classification models. J. Machine Learn. Res. 8, 1623-1657.
20. Sagha, H., Digumarti, S., del Millán, J., Chavarriaga, R., Calatroni, A., Roggen, D., Tröster, G., 2011a. Benchmarking classification techniques using the opportunity human activity dataset. In: 2011 IEEE Internat. Conf. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). pp. 36-40.
21. Sagha, H., Millán, J.d.R., Chavarriaga, R., 2011b. Detecting anomalies to improve classification performance in an opportunistic sensor network. In: 7th IEEE Internat. Workshop on Sensor Networks and Systems for Pervasive Computing, PerSens 2011, Seattle. pp. 154-159.
22. Stiefmeier, T., Roggen, D., Ogris, G., Lukowicz, P., Tröster, G., 2008. Wearable activity tracking in car manufacturing. IEEE Pervasive Comput. Mag. 7, 42-50. (Pubitemid 351575121)
23. Tenorth, M., Bandouch, J., Beetz, M., 2009. The TUM kitchen data set of everyday manipulation activities for motion tracking and action recognition. In: IEEE Internat. Workshop on Tracking Humans for the Evaluation of their Motion in Image Sequences (THEMIS) at ICCV. pp. 1089-1096.
24. Tentori, M., Favela, J., 2008. Activity-aware computing for healthcare. IEEE Pervasive Comput. Mag. 7, 51-57. (Pubitemid 351575122)
25. Van Laerhoven, K., Gellersen, H., Malliaris, Y., 2006. Long-term activity monitoring with a wearable sensor node. In: BSN 2006. Internat. Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor, Networks. pp. 171-174. (Pubitemid 44711307)
26. Ward, J.A., Lukowicz, P., Gellersen, H.W., 2011. Performance metrics for activity recognition. ACM Trans. Intell. Systems Technol. 2, 6:1-6:23.
27. Webb, G., 1999. Decision tree grafting from the all tests but one partition. In: Proc. Sixteenth Internat. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 702-707.
28. Zappi, P., Stiefmeier, T., Farella, E., Roggen, D., Benini, L., Tröster., G., 2007. Activity recognition from on-body sensors by classifier fusion: Sensor scalability and robustness. In: 3rd Internat. Conf. on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks, and Information Processing (ISSNIP). pp. 281-286.
29. Zinnen, A., Blanke, U., Schiele, B., 2009. An analysis of sensor-oriented vs. modelbased activity recognition. In: Internat. Symposium on Wearable Computers. IEEE Press, pp. 93-100.