Impact of correlation on predictive ability of biomarkers

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 32, Issue 24, 2013, Pages 4196-4210

  Demler, Olga V ^a   Pencina, Michael J ^b   D'Agostino, Ralph B ^c  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

Author keywords

AUC; Correlation; Discrimination; Linear discriminant analysis; Logistic regression; Risk prediction model

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER;

AGE; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EFFECT SIZE; FRAMINGHAM RISK SCORE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS OF COVARIANCE; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; RISK FACTOR; RISK PREDICTION MODEL; SIMULATION; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84885042093     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.5824     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Wilson PWF, D'Agostino RB, Levy D, Belanger AM, Silbershatz H, Kannel WB. Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97:1837-1847.
2. Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PWF, Kannel WB. Cardiovascular disease risk profiles. American Heart Journal 1991; 121:293-298.
3. D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain MR, Massaro JM, Kannel WB. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2008; 117:743-753.
4. Grundy SM, Becker D, Clark LT, Cooper RS, Denke MA, Howard WJ. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Journal of the American Medical Association 2001; 285:2486-2497.
5. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 1989; 81:1879-1886.
6. Gail MH, Costantino JP, Pee D, Bondy M, Newman L, Selvan M, Anderson GL, Malone KE, Marchbanks PA, McCaskill-Stevens W, Norman SA, Simon MA, Spirtas R, Ursin G, Bernstein L. Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2007; 99(23):1782-1792.
7. Golub TR, Slonim DK, Tamayo P, Huard C, Gaasenbeek M, Mesirov JP, Coller H, Loh ML, Downing JR, Caligiuri MA, Bloomfield CD, Lander ES. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring. Science 1999; 286(5439):531-537.
8. Pepe MS. The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press: New York, 2004, 77-79.
9. D'Agostino RB, Griffith JL, Schmidt CH, Terrin N. Measures for evaluating model performance. In Proceedings of the Biometrics Section. American Statistical Association, Biometrics Section: Alexandria, VA. U.S.A., 1997; 253-258.
10. Harrel FE. Tutorial in biostatistics: multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in Medicine 1996; 15:361-387.
11. Bamber D. The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1975; 12:387-415.
12. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29-36.
13. Su JQ, Liu JS. Linear combinations of multiple diagnostic markers. Journal of American Statistical Association 1993; 88(424):1350-1355.
14. Efron B. The efficiency of logistic regression compared to normal discriminant analysis. Journal of American Statistical Association 1973; 70(352):892-898.
15. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press: San Diego, 1979.
16. Cochran WG. On the performance of the linear discriminant function. Technometrics 1964; 6(2):179-190.
17. Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 1965; 52(34):591-611.
18. Pearson ES, D'Agostino RB, Bowman RO. Tests for departure from normality comparison of powers. Biometrika 1977; 64(2):231-246.
19. Weisberg S. Applied Linear Regression. John Wiley and Sons: New Jersey, 2005, 62-64.
20. Demler OV, Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB Sr. Equivalence of improvement in area under ROC curve and linear discriminant analysis coefficient under assumption of normality. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30(12):1410-1418.