The Institutional Dimension of "Market-Based Instruments" for Governing Ecosystem Services: Introduction to the Special Issue

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1113-1121

  Muradian, Roldan ^a,b   Gómez Baggethun, Erik ^c  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b FEDERAL RURAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^c INSTITUT DE CIÈNCIA I TECNOLOGIA AMBIENTALS   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84885025373     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2013.829380     Document Type: Editorial

References (26)

1. Andersson, K., and E. Ostrom. 2008. Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Policy Sci. 41: 71 - 79.
2. Arsel, M., and B. Buscher. 2012. Nature TM Inc.: Changes and continuities in neoliberal conservation and market-based environmental policy. Dev. Change 43: 53 - 78.
3. Bakker, K. 200. An uncooperative commodity: Privatizing water in England and Wales. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bowles, S. 2008. Policies designed for self-interested citizens may undermine "the moral sentiments": Evidence from economic experiments. Science 320: 1605 - 1609.
5. Coase, R. H. 1960. The problem of social cost. J. Law Economics 3: 1 - 44.
6. Driesen, D. 1998. M: Is emissions trading an economic incentive program? Replacing the command and control/economic incentive dichotomy. Washington Lee Law Rev. 55: 290 - 349.
7. Ferraro, P., and A. Kiss. 2002. Direct payments to conserve biodiversity. Science 298: 1718 - 1719.
8. Frame, D. 2011. The problems of markets: Science, norms and the commodification of carbon. Geogr. J. 177: 138 - 148.
9. Gómez-Baggethun, E., R. de Groot, P. Lomas, and C. Montes. 2010. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: From early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ. 6:1209-1218.
10. Gómez-Baggethun, E., and M. Ruiz-Pérez. 2011. Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 35: 613 - 628.
11. Krutilla, J. V. 1967. Conservation reconsidered. Am. Econ. Rev. 57: 777 - 786.
12. Luck, G. W., K. M. A. Chan, U. Eser, E. Gómez-Baggethun, B. Matzdorf, B. Norton, and B. Potschin. 2012. Ethical considerations in on-ground applications of the ecosystem services concept. BioScience 62: 1020 - 1029.
13. McAfee, K. 2012. The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets. Dev. Change 43: 105 - 131.
14. Menard, C. 1996. Why organizations matter: A journey away from the fairy tale. Atlantic Econ. J. 24: 281 - 300.
15. Miteva, D., S. Pattanayak, and P. J. Ferraro. 2012. Evaluation of biodiversity policy instruments: What works and what doesn't. Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy 28: 69 - 92.
16. Muradian, R., and L. Rival. 2012. Between markets and hierarchies: The challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosystem Serv. 1: 93 - 100.
17. Muradian, R., M. Arsel, L. Pellegrini, F. Adaman, B. Aguilar, B. Agarwal, E. Corbera, D. Ezzine, J. Farley, G. Froger, E. Garcia-Frapolli, E. Gómez-Baggethun, et al. 2013. Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conserv. Lett. 6: 274 - 279. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x
18. Ostrom, E., M. Janssen, and J. Anderies. 2007. Going beyond panaceas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 15176 - 15178.
19. Pattanayak, S., S. Wunder, and P. Ferraro. 2010. Show me the money: Do payments supply environmental services in developing countries? Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 4: 254 - 274.
20. Pearce, D. 2002. An Intellectual history of environmental economics. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 27: 57 - 81.
21. Pigou, A. C. 1920. The economics of welfare. New York: Cossimo Classics.
22. Ridker, R. G., and J. A. Henning. 1967. The determinants of residential property values with special reference to air pollution. Rev. Econ. Stat. 49: 246 - 257.
23. Salzman, J., and J. B. Ruhl. 2001. Currencies and the commodification of environmental law. Stanford Law Rev. 53: 607 - 694.
24. Stavins, R., and B. Whitehead. 1997. Market-based environmental policies. In Thinking ecologically: The next generation of environmental policy, ed. M. R. Chertow and D. Esty, 105 - 117. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
25. Vatn, A. 2010. An institutional analysis of payments for environmental services. Ecol. Econ. 69: 1245 - 1256.
26. Williamson, O. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Admin. Sci. Q. 36: 269 - 296.