Three-year follow up utilizing tantal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1556-1560

  Schmitz, Hans Christian R ^a   Klauser, Wolfgang ^a   Citak, Mustafa ^a   Al Khateeb, Hesham ^b   Gehrke, Thorsten ^a   Kendoff, Daniel ^a  

^a ENDO Klinik   (Germany)

^b ROYAL NATIONAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Revision; Short term; Tantal cones; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE DEFECT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; TANTALUM CONE; TIBIA; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

REVISION; SHORT-TERM; TANTAL CONES; TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE RESORPTION; FEMALE; FEMUR; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REOPERATION; TANTALUM; TIBIA;

EID: 84885022243     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.028     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Dixon T., Shaw M., Ebrahim S., et al. Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need. Ann Rheum Dis 2004, 63:825.
2. Kurtz S., Ong K., Lau E., et al. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:780.
3. Jacofsky D.J., Della Valle C.J., Meneghini R.M., et al. Revision total knee arthroplasty: what the practicing orthopaedic surgeon needs to know. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:1282.
4. Schmitz H.C., Schwantes B., Kendoff D. One-stage revision of knee endoprosthesis due to periprosthetic infection and Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome. Orthopade 2011, 40:624.
5. Haasper C., Kendoff D., Gebauer M., et al. Revision of unconstrained total knee arthroplasty-a technical analysis. Z Orthop Unfall 2012, 150:290.
6. Bush J.L., Wilson J.B., Vail T.P. Management of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 452:186.
7. Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Epidemiology of osteolysis: backside implant wear. Instr Course Lect 2004, 53:243.
8. Engh G.A., Ammeen D.J. Bone loss with revision total knee arthroplasty: defect classification and alternatives for reconstruction. Instr Course Lect 1999, 48:167.
9. Lonner J.H., Lotke P.A., Kim J., et al. Impaction grafting and wire mesh for uncontained defects in revision knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002, 404:145.
10. Panni A.S., Vasso M., Cerciello S. Modular augmentation in revision total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012, [in press].
11. Radnay C.S., Scuderi G.R. Management of bone loss: augments, cones, offset stems. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 446:83.
12. Toms A.D., Barker R.L., Jones R.S., et al. Impaction bone-grafting in revision joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:2050.
13. Tsahakis P.J., Beaver W.B., Brick G.W. Technique and results of allograft reconstruction in revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 303:86.
14. Jones R.E., Skedros J.G., Chan A.J., et al. Total knee arthroplasty using the S-ROM mobile-bearing hinge prosthesis. J Arthroplasty 2001, 16:279.
15. Pour A.E., Parvizi J., Slenker N., et al. Rotating hinged total knee replacement: use with caution. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1735.
16. Springer B.D., Hanssen A.D., Sim F.H., et al. The kinematic rotating hinge prosthesis for complex knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 392:283.
17. Springer B.D., Sim F.H., Hanssen A.D., et al. The modular segmental kinematic rotating hinge for nonneoplastic limb salvage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 421:181.
18. Bobyn J.D., Poggie R.A., Krygier J.J., et al. Clinical validation of a structural porous tantalum biomaterial for adult reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A(Suppl 2):123.
19. Lachiewicz P.F., Bolognesi M.P., Henderson R.A., et al. Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470:199.
20. Meneghini R.M., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D. Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008, 90:78.
21. Bobyn J.D., Stackpool G.J., Hacking S.A., et al. Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999, 81:907.
22. Welldon K.J., Atkins G.J., Howie D.W., et al. Primary human osteoblasts grow into porous tantalum and maintain an osteoblastic phenotype. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008, 84:691.
23. Cohen R. A porous tantalum trabecular metal: basic science. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2002, 31:216.
24. Schildhauer T.A., Robie B., Muhr G., et al. Bacterial adherence to tantalum versus commonly used orthopedic metallic implant materials. J Orthop Trauma 2006, 20:476.
25. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:13.
26. Murray P.B., Rand J.A., Hanssen A.D. Cemented long-stem revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, 309:116.
27. Ewald F.C. The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989, 248:9.
28. Nakashima Y., Mashima N., Imai H., et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of total hip arthroplasties using porous tantalum modular acetabular components: 5-year follow-up of clinical trial. Mod Rheumatol 2013, 23(1):112.
29. Davies J.H., Laflamme G.Y., Delisle J., et al. Trabecular metal used for major bone loss in acetabular hip revision. J Arthroplasty 2011, 26:1245.
30. Malizos K.N., Papasoulis E., Dailiana Z.H., et al. Early results of a novel technique using multiple small tantalum pegs for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a case series involving 26 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94:173.
31. Sheth N.P., Lonner J.H. Clinical use of porous tantalum in complex primary total knee arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2009, 38:526.
32. Fernandez-Fairen M., Murcia A., Torres A., et al. Is anterior cervical fusion with a porous tantalum implant a cost-effective method to treat cervical disc disease with radiculopathy?. Spine 2012, 37:1734.
33. Sagherian B.H., Claridge R.J. Porous tantalum as a structural graft in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int 2012, 33:179.
34. Breer S., Hahn M., Kendoff D., et al. Histological ex vivo analysis of retrieved human tantalum augmentations. Int Orthop 2012, 36:2269.
35. Jensen C.L., Petersen M.M., Schroder H.M., et al. Bone mineral density changes of the proximal tibia after revision total knee arthroplasty. A randomised study with the use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones. Int Orthop 2012, 36:1857.