A core outcome measures index (comi) for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1681-1686

  Impellizzeri, Franco M ^a   Mannion, Anne F ^a   Naal, Florian D ^a   Leunig, Michael ^a  

^a SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Patient related outcomes; Psychometrics; Questionnaires; Total hip replacement; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORE OUTCOME MEASURES INDEX; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOMES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT; VALIDITY;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84885021497     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Stratford P.W., Kennedy D.M. Performance measures were necessary to obtain a complete picture of osteoarthritic patients. J Clin Epidemiol 2006, 59:160.
2. Bombardier C., Melfi C.A., Paul J., Green R., Hawker G., Wright J., Coyte P. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care 1995, 33:AS131.
3. Hawker G., Melfi C., Paul J., Green R., Bombardier C. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacement surgery. J Rheumatol 1995, 22:1193.
4. Edwards P., Roberts I., Sandercock P., Frost C. Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter?. Control Clin Trials 2004, 25:31.
5. Edwards P., Roberts I., Clarke M., DiGuiseppi C., Pratap S., Wentz R., Kwan I., Cooper R. Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007, MR000008.
6. Deyo R.A., Battie M., Beurskens A.J., Bombardier C., Croft P., Koes B., Malmivaara A., Roland M., Von Korff M., Waddell G. Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine 1998, 23:2003.
7. Mannion A.F., Porchet F., Kleinstuck F.S., Lattig F., Jeszenszky D., Bartanusz V., Dvorak J., Grob D. The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective. Part 1: the Core Outcome Measures Index in clinical practice. Eur Spine J 2009, 18(Suppl 3):367.
8. Lozano-Alvarez C., Perez-Prieto D., Salo G., Molina A., Llado A., Ramirez M. Usefulness of the core outcome measures index in daily clinical practice for assessing patients with degenerative lumbar disease. Advances in orthopedics 2012, 2012:474685.
9. Zweig T., Mannion A.F., Grob D., Melloh M., Munting E., Tuschel A., Aebi M., Roder C. How to Tango: a manual for implementing Spine Tango. Eur Spine J 2009, 18(Suppl. 3):312.
10. Roder C., Chavanne A., Mannion A.F., Grob D., Aebi M. SSE Spine Tango-content, workflow, set-up. Eur Spine J 2005, 14:920. http://www.eurospine.org-SpineTango.
11. Roder C., El-Kerdi A., Grob D., Aebi M. A European spine registry. Eur Spine J 2002, 11:303.
12. Roder C., Muller U., Aebi M. The rationale for a spine registry. Eur Spine J 2006, 15(Suppl 1):S52.
13. Mannion A.F., Porchet F., Kleinstuck F.S., Lattig F., Jeszenszky D., Bartanusz V., Dvorak J., Grob D. The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index. Eur Spine J 2009, 18(Suppl 3):374.
14. Mannion A.F., Mutter U.M., Fekete F.T., O'Riordan D., Jeszenszky D., Kleinstueck F.S., Lattig F., Grob D., Porchet F. The bothersomeness of patient self-rated "complications" reported 1 year after spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2012, 21:1625.
15. Edwards P., Roberts I., Clarke M., DiGuiseppi C., Pratap S., Wentz R., Kwan I. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. BMJ 2002, 324:1183.
16. Mannion A.F., Elfering A., Staerkle R., Junge A., Grob D., Semmer N.K., Jacobshagen N., Dvorak J., Boos N. Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go?. Eur Spine J 2005, 14:1014.
17. Bellamy N., Kirwan J., Boers M., Brooks P., Strand V., Tugwell P., Altman R., Brandt K., Dougados M., Lequesne M. Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III. J Rheumatol 1997, 24:799.
18. Nevitt M.C., Epstein W.V., Masem M., Murray W.R. Work disability before and after total hip arthroplasty. Assessment of effectiveness in reducing disability. Arthritis Rheum 1984, 27:410.
19. Ethgen O., Bruyere O., Richy F., Dardennes C., Reginster J.Y. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:963.
20. Ferrer M., Pellise F., Escudero O., Alvarez L., Pont A., Alonso J., Deyo R. Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine 2006, 31:1372.
21. White P., Lewith G., Prescott P. The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure. Spine 2004, 29:1923.
22. Fankhauser C.D., Mutter U., Aghayev E., Mannion A.F. Validity and responsiveness of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the neck. Eur Spine J 2012, 21:101.
23. Staerkle R.F., Villiger P. Simple questionnaire for assessing core outcomes in inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 2011, 98:148.
24. Naal F.D., Sieverding M., Impellizzeri F.M., von Knoch F., Mannion A.F., Leunig M. Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted German Oxford hip score. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:952.
25. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Carr A., Murray D. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996, 78:185.
26. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., Carr A. A response to issues raised in a recent paper concerning the Oxford knee score. Knee 2006, 13:66.
27. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 1998, 46:1569. WHOQOL Group.
28. Gandek B., Ware J.E., Aaronson N.K., Apolone G., Bjorner J.B., Brazier J.E., Bullinger M., Kaasa S., Leplege A., Prieto L., Sullivan M. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998, 51:1171.
29. Ware J., Kosinski M., Keller S.D. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996, 34:220.
30. Bullinger M, Kirchberger I. Der SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand. Handbuch für die deutschsprachige Fragebogenversion. Göttingen: Hogrefe Verlag für Psychologie, 1998.
31. Rabin R., de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med 2001, 33:337.
32. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990, 16:199. The EuroQol Group.
33. Prieto L., Sacristan J.A. What is the value of social values? The uselessness of assessing health-related quality of life through preference measures. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004, 4:10.
34. Stucki G., Meier D., Stucki S., Michel B.A., Tyndall A.G., Dick W., Theiler R. Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Arthrosis Index. Z Rheumatol 1996, 55:40.
35. Impellizzeri F.M., Mannion A.F., Naal F.D., Hersche O., Leunig M. The early outcome of surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement: success depends on how you measure it. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2012, 20:638.
36. Mannion A.F., Elfering A. Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 2006, 15(Suppl 1):S93.
37. Kleinstueck F.S., Fekete T.F., Mannion A.F., Grob D., Porchet F., Mutter U., Jeszenszky D. To fuse or not to fuse in lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: do baseline symptoms help provide the answer?. Eur Spine J 2012, 21:268.
38. Moran L.A., Guyatt G.H., Norman G.R. Establishing the minimal number of items for a responsive, valid, health-related quality of life instrument. J Clin Epidemiol 2001, 54:571.
39. van Hooff M.L., Geurts S.A., Kompier M.A., Taris T.W. How fatigued do you currently feel?. Convergent and discriminant validity of a single-item fatigue measure. J Occup Health 2007, 49:224.
40. Wright J.G., Feinstein A.R. A comparative contrast of clinimetric and psychometric methods for constructing indexes and rating scales. J Clin Epidemiol 1992, 45:1201.
41. Wanous J.P., Reichers A.E., Hudy M.J. Overall job satisfaction: how good are single-item measures?. J Appl Psychol 1997, 82:247.
42. Davey H.M., Barratt A.L., Butow P.N., Deeks J.J. A one-item question with a Likert or Visual Analog Scale adequately measured current anxiety. J Clin Epidemiol 2007, 60:356.
43. Fransen M., Edmonds J. Reliability and validity of the EuroQol in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. Rheumatology (Oxford) 1999, 38:807.
44. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy 1996, 37:53.
45. Impellizzeri F.M., Bizzini M., Leunig M., Maffiuletti N.A., Mannion A.F. Money matters: exploiting the data from outcomes research for quality improvement initiatives. Eur Spine J 2009, 18(Suppl 3):348.