A Novel Craniotomy simulator provides a validated method to enhance education in the management of traumatic brain injury

Neurosurgery

Volumn 73, Issue SUPPL. 4, 2013, Pages

  Lobel, Darlene A ^a   Elder, J Bradley ^b   Schirmer, Clemens M ^c,d   Bowyer, Mark W ^e   Rezai, Ali R ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY WEXNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Craniotomy; Curriculum; Education; Neurotrauma; Residency; Simulation; Traumatic brain injury

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRANIOTOMY; CURRICULUM; HUMAN; INCISION; MEDICAL STUDENT; POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESIDENCY EDUCATION; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; SKILL; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY;

ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; BRAIN INJURIES; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CRANIOTOMY; CURRICULUM; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; MILITARY MEDICINE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; NEUROSURGERY;

EID: 84885015018     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/neurosurgery/73.suppl_1.s57     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME). Common Program Requirements. Available at: http://wwwacgmeorg/acgmeweb/Portals/0/dh- dutyhoursCommonPR07012007pdf, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), 2011.
2. Acosta E, Liu A, Armonda R, et al. Burrhole simulation for an intracranial hematoma simulator. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;125:1-6.
3. Faulkner H, Regehr G, Martin J, Reznick R. Validation of an objective structured assessment of technical skill for surgical residents. Acad Med. 1996;71(12):1363-1365. (Pubitemid 26427386)
4. Gallagher AG, Ritter EM, Champion H, et al. Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training. Ann Surg. 2005;241(2):364-372.
5. Mazzola CA, Lobel DA, Krishnamurthy S, Bloomgarden GM, Benzil DL. Efficacy of neurosurgery resident education in the new millennium: the 2008 Council of State Neurosurgical Societies post-residency survey results. Neurosurgery.2010;67 (2):225-232; discussion 232-223.
6. Palter VN, Orzech N, Reznick RK, Grantcharov TP. Validation of a structured training and assessment curriculum for technical skill acquisition in minimally invasive surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2013;257(2):224-230.
7. Dumont TM, Rughani AI, Penar PL, Horgan MA, Tranmer BI, Jewell RP. Increased rate of complications on a neurological surgery service after implementation of the Accreditatioin Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hour restriction. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:483-486.
8. Ganju A, Aoun SG, Daou MR, et al. The role of simulation in neurosurgical education: a survey of 99 United States Neurosurgery Program Directors. World Neurosurg. 2012. Epub ahead of print.
9. Tedesco MM, Pak JJ, Harris J Jr, Krummel TM, Dalman RL, Lee JT. Simulationbased endovascular skills assessment: the future of credentialing? J Vasc Surg. 2008; 47(5):1008-1014.
10. Alaraj A, Charbel FT, Birk D, et al. Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training. Neurosurgery.2013;72(suppl 1):115-123.
11. Ghobrial GM, Anderson PA, Chitale R, Campbell PG, Lobel DA, Harrop JS. Simulated spinal cerebrospinal fluid leak repair: an educational model with didactic and technical components. Neurosurgery. 73(suppl 1):S111-S115.
12. Sim P. Web-based Surgical Simulation. [MSc Thesis]. School of Computing, University of Leeds, 2000.
13. Delorme S, Laroche D, DiRaddo R, Del Maestro RF. NeuroTouch: a physicsbased virtual simulator for cranial microsurgery training. Neurosurgery. 2012;71 (suppl 1 operative):32-42.
14. Wong GK, Zhu CX, Ahuja AT, Poon WS. Craniotomy and clipping of intracranial aneurysm in a stereoscopic virtual reality environment. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3):564-568. (Pubitemid 47442644)
15. Pflesser B, Petersik A, Tiede U, Höhne K, Leuwer R. Volume cutting for virtual petrous bone surgery. Comput Aided Surg. 2002;7(2):74-83. (Pubitemid 34773621)
16. ScerboMW, Turner TR, Newlin-Canzone E, et al. A Preliminary evaluation of a burr hole drilling simulator for craniotomy. Paper Presented at: Proceedings of the Human Factors And Ergonomics Society 54th Annual Meeting. 2010;54(27):2361-2365.
17. Lemole GM Jr, Banerjee PP, Luciano C, Neckrysh S, Charbel FT. Virtual reality in neurosurgical education: part-task ventriculostomy simulation with dynamic visual and haptic feedback. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(1):142-148. (Pubitemid 47356487)
18. Abboudi H, Khan MS, Aboumarzouk O, et al. Current status of validation for robotic surgery simulators-a systematic review. BJU Int. 2013;111(2):194-205.
19. Kelly DC, Margules AC, Kundavaram CR, et al. Face, content, and construct validation of the Da Vinci skills simulator. Urology. 2012;79(5):1068-1072.
20. Liss MA, Abdelshehid C,Quach S, et al. Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer (™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator (™) using theMimic (™) software for urologic robotic surgical education. J Endourol. 2012;26(12):1629-1634.
21. Singapogu RB, DuBose S, Long LO, et al. Salient haptic skills trainer: initial validation of a novel simulator for training force-based laparoscopic surgical skills. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(5);1653-1661.
22. Plooy AM, Hill A, Horswill MS, et al. Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76(1):144-150.
23. Slade Shantz JA, Leiter JR, Gottschalk T, Macdonald PB. The internal validity of arthroscopic simulators and their effectiveness in arthroscopic education. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012. Epub ahead of print.
24. Dayal R, Faries PL, Lin SC, et al. Computer simulation as a component of catheter-based training. J Vasc Surg. 2004;40(6):1112-1117. (Pubitemid 40037278)
25. Shamim Khan M, Ahmed K, Gavazzi A, et al. Development and implementation of centralized simulation training: evaluation of feasibility, acceptability and construct validity. BJU Int. 2013;111(3):518-523.