Construct validation of a physical model colonoscopy simulator

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 144-150

  Plooy, Annaliese M ^a   Hill, Andrew ^a,b   Horswill, Mark S ^a   Cresp, Alanna St G ^a   Watson, Marcus O ^a,b   Ooi, Soong Yuan ^a,b   Riek, Stephan ^a   Wallis, Guy M ^a   Burgess Limerick, Robin ^a   Hewett, David G ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b Clinical Skills Development Service   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASCENDING COLON; CECUM; COLONOSCOPY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESCENDING COLON; FORCE; HUMAN; KYOTO KAGAKU COLONOSCOPE TRAINING MODEL; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL STUDENT; PHYSICAL MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECTUM; SIGMOID; SIMULATION; SIMULATOR; STUDENT; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CECUM; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOSCOPY; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMANS; INTUBATION, GASTROINTESTINAL; MANIKINS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84862698600     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: 10976779     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.03.246     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills: changes in the wind. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2664-9.
2. Williams CB, Thomas-Gibson S. Rational colonoscopy, realistic simulation, and accelerated teaching. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006;16:457-70.
3. Sedlack RE. Endoscopic simulation: where we have been and where we are going. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:216-8.
4. Sedlack RE. Simulators in training: defining the optimal role for various simulation models in the training environment. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006;16:553-63.
5. Fairhurst K, Strickland A, Maddern GJ. Simulation speak. J Surg Ed 2011;68:382-6.
6. Sedlack RE, Kolars JC. Validation of a computer-based colonoscopy simulator. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;57:214-8.
7. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Orchard TR, et al. An innovative method for the assessment of skills in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Surg Endosc 2004;18:1613-9.
8. Fayez R, Feldman LS, Kaneva P, et al. Testing the construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II virtual reality colonoscopy simulator metrics: module matters. Surg Endosc 2010;24:1060-5.
9. Koch AD, Buzink SN, Heemskerk J, et al. Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy. Surg Endosc 2008;22:158-62.
10. Ritter EM, McClusky DA, 3rd, Lederman AB, et al. Objective psychomotor skills assessment of experienced and novice flexible endoscopists with a virtual reality simulator. J Gastrointest Surg 2003;7:871-7.
11. Grantcharov TP, Carstensen L, Schulze S. Objective assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopy skills using a virtual reality simulator. JSLS 2005;9:130-3.
12. Felsher JJ, Olesevich M, Farres H, et al. Validation of a flexible endoscopy simulator. Am J Surg 2005;189:497-500.
13. Koch AD, Haringsma J, Schoon EJ, et al. A second-generation virtual reality simulator for colonoscopy: validation and initial experience. Endoscopy 2008;40:735-8.
14. Haycock AV, Bassett P, Bladen J, et al. Validation of the secondgeneration Olympus colonoscopy simulator for skills assessment. Endoscopy 2009;41:952-8.
15. Sedlack RE, Baron TH, Downing SM, et al. Validation of a colonoscopy simulation model for skills assessment.AmJ Gastroenterol 2007;102:64-74.
16. Hill A, Horswill MS, Plooy AM, et al. Assessing the realism of colonoscopy simulation: the development of an instrument and systematic comparison of four simulators. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:631-40.
17. Cass OW. Objective evaluation of competence: technical skills in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy 1995;27:86-9.
18. Marshall JB. Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 1995;42:287-91.
19. Spier BJ, Benson M, Pfau PR, et al. Colonoscopy training in gastroenterology fellowships: determining competence. Gastrointest Endosc 2009;71:319-24.
20. Lee SH, Chung IK, Kim SJ, et al.Anadequate level of training for technical competence in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: a prospective multicenter evaluation of the learning curve. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:683-9.
21. Chak A, Cooper GS, Blades EW, et al. Prospective assessment of colonoscopic intubation skills in trainees. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:217-30.
22. Dogramadzi S, Virk GS, Bell GD, et al. Recording forces exerted on the bowel wall during colonoscopy: in vitro evaluation. Int J Med Robot 2005;1:89-97.
23. Appleyard MN, Mosse CA, Mills TN, et al. The measurement of forces exerted during colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;52:237-40.
24. Colonoscope Training Model: Training Guide. Kyoto, Japan: Kyoto Kagaku Co. Ltd., 2007.
25. Kotrlik JW, Williams HA. The incorporation of effect size in information technology, learning, and performance research. Inform Technol Learn Perform J 2003;21:1-7.
26. Howell DC. Statistical methods for psychology (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press, 1997.
27. Sedlack RE, Kolars JC. Computer simulator training enhances the competency of gastroenterology fellows at colonoscopy: results of a pilot study. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;99:33-7.
28. Cohen JC, Cohen SA, Vora KC, et al. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of virtual-reality simulator training in acquisition of competency in colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:361-8.
29. Park J, MacRae H, Musselman LJ, et al. Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality simulator training: transfer to live patients. Am J Surg 2007;194:205-11.