Modelling Dyadic Interaction with Hawkes Processes

Psychometrika

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 793-814

  Halpin, Peter F ^a   De Boeck, Paul ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

dyadic interaction; EM algorithm; event sampling; Hawkes processes; maximum likelihood

Indexed keywords

ADULT; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMETRY; STATISTICS;

ADULT; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; PSYCHOMETRICS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84884987804     PISSN: 00333123     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-013-9329-1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Anderson, P. A. (2008). Positions of power: status and dominance in organizational communication. In L. Guerrero & M. L. Hecht (Eds.), The nonverbal communication reader: classical and contemporary perspectives (3rd ed., pp. 450-468). Prospect Heights: Waveland.
2. Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1997). Observing interaction: an introduction to sequential analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2011). Sequential analysis and observations methods of the behavioural sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Barabási, A. L. (2005). The origin of bursts and heavy tails in human dynamics. Nature, 435, 207-211.
5. Brillinger, D. R. (1975). The identification of point process systems. Annals of Probability, 3, 909-924.
6. Brillinger, D. R. (2004). Some data analyses using mutual information. Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 18, 163-182.
7. Card, N., Selig, J., & Little, T. (2008). Modeling dyadic and interdependent data in the developmental and behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Psychology Press.
8. Chow, S. M., Ferrer, E., & Hsieh, F. (2010). Statistical methods for modeling human dynamics: an interdisciplinary dialogue. New York: Taylor & Francis.
9. Cox, D. R., & Isham, V. (1980). Point processes. New York: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
10. Crane, R., & Sornette, D. (2008). Robust dynamic classes revealed by measuring the response function of a social system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 15649-15653.
11. Daley, D. J., & Vere-Jones, D. (2003). An introduction to the theory of point processes: elementary theory and methods (Vol. 1, 2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
12. Dayan, P., & Abbott, L. F. (2005). Theoretical neuroscience: computational and mathematical modeling of neural systems. Cambridge: MIT Press.
13. Ebel, H., Mielsch, L.-I., & Bornholdt, S. (2002). Scale-free topology of e-mail networks. Physical Review E, 66, 035103.
14. Eckmann, J. P., Moses, E., & Sergi, D. (2004). Entropy of dialogues creates coherent structures in e-mail traffic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 14333-14337.
15. Ferrer, E., Steele, J. S., & Hsieh, F. (2012). Analyzing the dynamics of affective dyadic interactions using patterns of intra- and inter-individual variability. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 136-171.
16. Girard, R. (1976). Deceit, desire, and the novel: self and other in literary structure. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
17. Gottman, J. M. (1994). Why marriages succeed or fail. New York: Simon and Schuster.
18. Gottman, J. M., Murray, J. D., Swanson, C., Tyson, R., & Swanson, K. R. (2003). The mathematics of marriage. Cambridge: MIT Press.
19. Hamaker, E. L., Zhang, Z., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (2009). Using threshold autoregressive models to study dyadic interactions. Psychometrika, 74, 727-745.
20. Hawkes, A. G. (1971). Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika, 58, 83-90.
21. Hawkes, A. G., & Oakes, D. (1974). A cluster representation of a self-exciting process. Journal of Applied Probability, 11, 493-503.
22. Isham, V., & Westcott, M. (1979). A self-correcting point process. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 8, 335-347.
23. Jamshidian, M., & Jennrich, R. I. (2000). Standard errors for EM estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Statistical Methodology), 62, 257-270.
24. Kalman, Y. M., David, G., & Rafaeli, D. R. R. S. (2006). Pauses and response latencies: a chronemic analysis of asynchronous CMC. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1-23.
25. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
26. Kenny, D. A., & Ledermann, T. (2010). Detecting, measuring, and testing dyadic patterns in the actor-partner interdependence mode. Journal of Family Psychology, 24, 359-366.
27. Law, R., Illian, J., Burslem, D. F. R. P., Gratzer, G., Gunatilleke, C. V. S., & Gunatilleke, I. A. U. N. (2009). Ecological information from spatial patterns of plants: insights from point process theory. Journal of Ecology, 97, 616-628.
28. Madhyastha, T. M., Hamaker, E. L., & Gottman, J. M. (2011). Investigating spousal influence using moment-to-moment affect data from marital conflict. Journal of Family Psychology, 25, 292-300.
29. Magnusson, M. S. (2005). Discovering hidden structure with model and algorithms. In L. Anolli, S. Duncan Jr., M. S. Magnusson, & G. Riva (Eds.), The hidden structure of interaction: from neurons to culture patterns (pp. 4-22). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
30. McLachlan, G. J., & Krishnan, T. (2008). The EM algorithm and extensions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
31. McLachlan, G. J., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.
32. Moore, C., & Dunham, P. (1995). Joint attention: its origins and role in development. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
33. Newman, M. E. J. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemporary Physics, 46, 323-351.
34. Ogata, Y. (1978). The asymptotic behaviour of maximum likelihood estimates for stationary point processes. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 30, 243-261.
35. Ogata, Y. (1988). Statistical models for earthquake occurrences and residual analysis for point processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 9-27.
36. R Development Core Team (2011). R: a language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Available from http://www. R-project. org/ (ISBN 3-900051-07-0).
37. Rasmussen, J. G. (2011). Bayesian inference for Hawkes' processes. Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability. doi: 10. 1007/s11009-011-9272-5.
38. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
39. Schoenberg, F., & Bolt, B. (2000). Short-term exciting, long-term correcting models for earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 90, 849-858.
40. Scott, M. (2011). Affinity models for career sequences. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, 60, 417-436.
41. Seber, G. A. F., & Wild, C. J. (2003). Non-linear regression (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
42. Truccolo, W., Eden, U. T., Fellows, M. R., Donoghue, J. P., & Brown, E. N. (2005). A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects. Journal of Neurophysiology, 93, 1074-1089.
43. Veen, A., & Schoenberg, F. P. (2008). Estimation of space-time branching process models in seismology using an EM-type algorithm. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103, 614-624.