Detecting, Measuring, and Testing Dyadic Patterns in the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model

Journal of Family Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 359-366

  Kenny, David A ^a   Ledermann, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

actor partner effects; bootstrapping; dyadic data; phantom variables; structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HOMOSEXUALITY; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; SATISFACTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES; MALE HOMOSEXUALITY; PSYCHOLOGY;

CODEPENDENCY (PSYCHOLOGY); FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HETEROSEXUALITY; HOMOSEXUALITY, MALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; SEX FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77953700661     PISSN: 08933200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0019651     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Acitelli L.K. Sampling couples to understand them: Mixing the theoretical with the practical. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 14 (1997) 243-261
2. Blumstein P., and Schwartz P. American couples: Money, work, sex (1983), William Morrow, New York
3. Campbell L., Simpson J.A., Boldry J.G., and Kashy D. Perceptions of conflict and support in romantic relationships: The role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88 (2005) 510-531
4. Griffin D.W., and Gonzalez R. Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin 118 (1995) 430-439
5. Kashy D.A., and Kenny D.A. The analysis of data from dyads and groups. In: Reis H.T., and Judd C.M. (Eds). Handbook of research methods in social psychology (2000), Cambridge University Press, New York 451-477
6. Kelley H.H., Holmes J.G., Kerr N.L., Reis H.T., Rusbult C.E., and Van Lange P.A. An atlas of interpersonal situations (2003), Cambridge University Press, New York
7. Kenny D.A. Models of non-independence in dyadic research. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 13 (1996) 279-294
8. Kenny D.A., and Cook W.L. Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations. Personal Relationships 6 (1999) 433-448
9. Kenny D.A., Kashy D.A., and Cook W.L. Dyadic data analysis (2006), Guilford Press, New York
10. Kenny D.A., and La Voie L. Separating individual and group effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 48 (1985) 339-348
11. Klumb P., Hoppmann C., and Staats M. Work hours affect spouse's cortisol secretion-for better and for worse. Psychosomatic Medicine 68 (2006) 742-746
12. MacCallum R.C., Wegener D.T., Uchiono B.N., and Fabrigar L.R. The problem of equivalent models in applications of covariance structure analysis. Psychological Bulletin 114 (1993) 185-199
13. Olsen J.A., and Kenny D.A. Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods 11 (2006) 127-141
14. Pesonen A., Räikkönen K., and Heinonen K. Depressive vulnerability in parents and their 5-year-old child's temperament: A family system perspective. Journal of Family Psychology 20 (2006) 648-655
15. Peterson B.D., Pirritano M., Christensen U., and Schmidt L. The impact of partner coping in couples experiencing infertility. Human Reproduction 23 (2008) 1128-1137
16. Rindskopf D. Using phantom and imaginary latent variables to parameterize constraints in linear structural models. Psychometrika 49 (1984) 37-47
17. Rogge R.D., Cobb R.J., Story L.B., Johnson M.D., Lawrence E.E., Rothman A.D., and Bradbury T.N. Recruitment and selection of couples for intervention research: Achieving developmental homogeneity at the cost of demographic diversity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 74 (2006) 774-784
18. Tukey J.W. Causation, regression and path analysis. In: Kempthorne O., Bancroft T.A., Gowen J.W., and Lush J.L. (Eds). Statistics and mathematics in biology (1954), Iowa State College Press, Ames 35-66
19. Woody E., and Sadler P. Structural equation models for interchangeable dyads: Being the same makes a difference. Psychological Methods 10 (2005) 139-158