The shallow-water component of the Chesapeake Bay environmental model package

Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volumn 49, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 1091-1102

  Cerco, Carl F ^a   Noel, Mark R ^a   Wang, Ping ^b  

^a US ARMY ENGINEER RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER   (United States)

^b VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE   (United States)

Author keywords

Chesapeake Bay; Eutrophication; Macrophytes; Sediment transport; Simulation; Turbidity

Indexed keywords

CHESAPEAKE BAY; ENVIRONMENTAL MODEL; EQUILIBRIUM DISTRIBUTIONS; MACROPHYTES; MODEL REPRESENTATION; SEDIMENT RE SUSPENSIONS; SIMULATION; SUBMERGED AQUATIC VEGETATIONS;

SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; TURBIDITY;

EUTROPHICATION;

BAY; ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING; EUTROPHICATION; LIGHT ATTENUATION; MACROPHYTE; PERENNIAL PLANT; RESUSPENSION; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; SHALLOW-WATER EQUATION; SUBMERGED VEGETATION; SUSPENDED SEDIMENT; TURBIDITY;

CHESAPEAKE BAY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884987727     PISSN: 1093474X     EISSN: 17521688     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jawr.12106     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bricker, O., W. Newell, and N. Simon, 2004. Bog Iron Formation in the Nassawango Creek Watershed, Maryland, USA. In: First International Conference on Monitoring, Management, Simulation and Remediation of the Geological Environment (Geo-Environment), Segovia, Spain, J. Martin-Deque, C. Brebbia, A. Godfrey, and J. Diaz de Teran (Editors). WIT Press, Southampton, United Kingdom, pp. 13-23, ISBN: 0-85312-723-X.
2. Cerco, C. and T. Cole, 1993. Three-Dimensional Eutrophication Model of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Environmental Engineering 119(6):1006-1025.
3. Cerco, C., S.-C. Kim, and M. Noel, 2010. The 2010 Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication Model. A Report to the US Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program and to the US Army Engineer Baltimore District. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/the_2010_chesapeake_bay_eutrophication_model1, accessed July 2013.
4. Cerco, C., S.-C. Kim, and M. Noel, 2012. Management Model of Suspended Solids in the Chesapeake Bay, USA. Estuarine, Coastal, and Shelf Science 116:87-98, doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2012.07.009.
5. Cerco, C. and K. Moore, 2001. System-Wide Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Model for Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 24(4):522-534.
6. Cerco, C. and M. Noel, 2004. The 2002 Chesapeake Bay Eutrophication Model. US Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office EPA 903-R-04-004, 349 pp. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/the_2002_chesapeake_bay_eutrophication_model, accessed July 2013.
7. Cerco, C. and M. Noel, 2007. Can Oyster Restoration Reverse Cultural Eutrophication in Chesapeake Bay? Estuaries and Coasts 30(2):331-343.
8. Cerco, C. and M. Noel, 2010. Monitoring, Modeling, and Management Impacts of Bivalve Filter Feeders in the Oligohaline and Tidal Fresh Regions of the Chesapeake Bay System. Ecological Modelling 221:1054-1064.
9. Cerco, C., M. Noel, and L. Linker, 2004. Managing for Water Clarity in Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Environmental Engineering 130(6):631-642.
10. Cerco, C.F. and M.R. Noel, 2013. Twenty-One-Year Simulation of Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Using the CE-QUAL-ICM Eutrophication Model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, doi: 10.1111/jawr.12107. EPA-903-R-13-011. CBP/TRS-317-13-10.
11. Chen, C., R.C. Beardsley, and G. Cowles, 2006. An Unstructured Grid, Finite-Volume Coastal Ocean Model (FVCOM) System. Oceanography 19(1):78-89.
12. Chesapeake Bay Program, 1992. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Habitat Requirements and Restoration Targets: A Technical Synthesis. CBP/TRS 83/92. US Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program, Annapolis, Maryland, 186 pp.
13. DiToro, D., 2001. Sediment Flux Modeling. John Wiley and Sons, New York City, New York, ISBN: 0-471-13535-6.
14. Gallegos, C., 2001. Calculating Optical Water Quality Targets to Restore and Protect Submerged Aquatic Vegetation: Overcoming Problems in Partitioning the Diffuse Attenuation Coefficient for Photosynthetically Active Radiation. Estuaries 24(3):381-397.
15. Gallegos, C., E. Lewis, and H. Kim, 2006. Coupling Suspended Sediment Dynamics and Light Penetration in Chesapeake Bay. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/coupling_suspended_sediment_dynamics_and_light_penetration_in_the_upper_che, accessed July 2013.
16. Gallegos, C.L., P.J. Werdell, and C.R. McClain, 2011. Long-Term Changes in Light Scattering in Chesapeake Bay Inferred From Secchi Depth, Light Attenuation, and Remote Sensing Measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research 117:1-19, doi: 10.1029/JC2011007160.
17. Holmes, R., 1970. The Secchi Disk in Turbid Coastal Water. Limnology and Oceanography 15:688-694.
18. Johnson, B., K. Kim, R. Heath, B. Hsieh, and L. Butler, 1993. Validation of a Three-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Model of Chesapeake Bay. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering 199(1):2-10.
19. Kim, S.-C., 2013. Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Model Applied to Chesapeake Bay Through Long-Term Simulation of Transport Processes. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, doi: 10.1111/jawr.12113. EPA-903-R-13-006. CBP/TRS-312-13-5.
20. Lee, Z.-P., K.P. Du, and R. Arnone, 2005. A Model for the Diffuse Attenuation Coefficient of Downwelling Irradiance. Journal of Geophysical Research 110:1-10, doi: 10.1029/2004JC002275.
21. Martin, S.K., G. Savant, and D. McVan, 2011. Two Dimensional Numerical Model of the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway Near New Orleans. ASCE Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering 138(3):236-245, doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)WW.1943-5460.0000119.
22. Moore, K., D. Wilcox, and R. Orth, 2000. Analysis of the Abundance of Submersed Aquatic Vegetation Communities in the Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 23:115-127.
23. Orth, R.J., M. Williams, S. Marion, D. Wilcox, T. Carruthers, W. Kenneth Moore, M. Kemp, W. Dennison, N. Rybicki, P. Bergstrom, and R. Batiuk, 2010. Long-Term Trends in Submersed Aquatic Vegetation (SAV) in Chesapeake Bay, USA, Related to Water Quality. Estuaries and Coasts 33(5):1144-1163, doi: 10.1007/s12237-010-9311-4.
24. Passow, U., 2002. Transparent Exopolymer Particles (TEP) in Aquatic Environments. Progress in Oceanography 55:287-333.
25. Shenk, G.W. and L.C. Linker, 2013. Development and Application of the 2010 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Total Maximum Daily Load Model. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, doi: 10.1111/jawr.12109. EPA-903-R-13-004. CBP/TRS-310-13-3.
26. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 2003. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophyll a for the Chesapeake Bay and Its Tidal Tributaries. EPA 903-R-03-002. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland, 343 pp. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/ambient_water_quality_criteria_for_dissolved_oxygen_water_clarity_and_chlor, accessed July 2013.
27. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 2008. Ambient Water Quality Criteria for Dissolved Oxygen, Water Clarity and Chlorophyll a for the Chesapeake Bay and Its Tidal Tributaries. 2008 Technical Support for Criteria Assessment Protocols Addendum. EPA 903-R-08-001. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III Chesapeake Bay Program Office, Annapolis, Maryland, 82 pp. http://www.chesapeakebay.net/publications/title/ambient_water_quality_criteria_for_dissolved_oxygen_water_clarity_and_3, accessed July 2013.