Dry box training with three-dimensional vision for the assistant surgeon in robot-assisted urological surgery

International Journal of Urology

Volumn 20, Issue 10, 2013, Pages 1037-1041

  Hinata, Nobuyuki ^a   Iwamoto, Hideto ^a   Morizane, Shuichi ^a   Hikita, Katsuya ^a   Yao, Akihisa ^a   Muraoka, Kuniyasu ^a   Honda, Masashi ^a   Isoyama, Tadahiro ^a   Sejima, Takehiro ^a   Takenaka, Atsushi ^a  

^a TOTTORI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Learning curve; Radical prostatectomy; Robot assisted surgery; Three dimensional vision system; Training

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBO ASSISTED UROLOGICAL SURGERY; SURGEON; SURGICAL TRAINING; THREE DIMENSIONAL VISION; UROLOGIC SURGERY; VISION IMAGE INTENSIFICATION AID;

LEARNING CURVE; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGERY; THREE-DIMENSIONAL VISION SYSTEM; TRAINING;

ADULT; COMPETENCY-BASED EDUCATION; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOTICS;

EID: 84884984579     PISSN: 09198172     EISSN: 14422042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/iju.12101     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Sur RL, Wagner AA, Albala DM, Su LM. Critical role of the assistant in laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol. 2008; 22: 587-589; discussion 589-90.
2. Sgarbura O, Vasilescu C. The decisive role of the patient-side surgeon in robotic surgery. Surg. Endosc. 2010; 24: 3149-3155.
3. Matsuda T, Ono Y, Terachi T etal. The endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in urological laparoscopy: a novel system in Japan. J. Urol. 2006; 176: 2168-2172; discussion 2172.
4. Taffinder N, Smith SG, Huber J, Russell RC, Darzi A. The effect of a second-generation 3D endoscope on the laparoscopic precision of novices and experienced surgeons. Surg. Endosc. 1999; 13: 1087-1092.
5. Storz P, Buess GF, Kunert W, Kirschniak A. 3D HD versus 2D HD: surgical task efficiency in standardised phantom tasks. Surg. Endosc. 2012; 26: 1454-1460.
6. Peitgen K, Walz MV, Holtmann G, Eigler FW. A prospective randomized experimental evaluation of three-dimensional imaging in laparoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1996; 44: 262-267.
7. Byrn JC, Schluender S, Divino CM etal. Three-dimensional imaging improves surgical performance for both novice and experienced operators using the da Vinci Robot System. Am. J. Surg. 2007; 193: 519-522.
8. Lee B, Kim Y. Three-dimensional display and imaging: status and prospects. Optical Imaging and Metrology: John Wiley & Sons; 2012.
9. Lallas CD, Davis and Members of the Society of Urologic Robotic Surgeons JW. Robotic surgery training with commercially available simulation systems in 2011: a current review and practice pattern survey from the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J. Endourol. 2012; 26: 283-293.
10. Korets R, Mues AC, Graversen JA etal. Validating the use of the Mimic dV-trainer for robotic surgery skill acquisition among urology residents. Urology 2011; 78: 1326-1330.
11. Reznick RK, MacRae H. Teaching surgical skills - changes in the wind. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006; 355: 2664-2669.