From carbon projects to better land-use planning: Three Latin American initiatives

Ecology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Rival, Laura M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Ara ua Sustent vel; Bolsa Floresta; Earth governance; Landscapes under ecosystem based management; Payments for ecosystem services; REDD+ schemes; Yasun Ishpingo Tambococha Tiputini Initiative

Indexed keywords

CARBON EMISSION; ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; EMISSION CONTROL; ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LAND USE PLANNING; UNITED NATIONS;

AMAZONAS [BRAZIL]; ARACUAI; BRAZIL; ECUADOR; LATIN AMERICA; MINAS GERAIS;

EID: 84884963491     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05563-180317     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Angelsen, A., M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, and L. V. Verchot, editors. 2012. Analysing REDD+. Challenges and choices. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/3805.html
2. Barnard, A. 2011. We are the lungs of the world: popular environmentalism and the local politics of climate change in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Thesis in Development Studies. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Mimeo.
3. Betts, R., Y. Malhi, and J. T. Roberts. 2008. The future of the Amazon: new perspectives from climate, ecosystem and social sciences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363(1498):1729-1735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0011
4. Bovarnick, A., F. Alpizar, and C. Schnell, editors. 2010. The importance of biodiversity and ecosystems in economic growth and equity in Latin America and the Caribbean: an economic valuation of ecosystem. United Nations Development Program, New York, New York, USA.
5. Burawoy, M. 2009. The extended case method: four countries, four decades, four great transformations, and one theoretical tradition. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA.
6. Chapin, F. S., G. P. Kofinas, and C. Folke, editors. 2009. Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, London, UK.
7. Corbera, E., and H. Schroeder. 2011. Governing and implementing REDD+. Environmental Science and Policy 14:89-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2010.11.002
8. Farley, J. 2012. Ecosystem services: the economics debate. Ecosystem Services 1(1):40-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.002
9. Flyvbjerg, B., T. Landman, and F. Schram, editors. 2012. Real social science: applied phronesis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511719912
10. Folke, C., F. S. Chapin III, and P. Olsson. 2009. Transformations in ecosystem stewardship. Pages 103-125 in F. S. Chapin, G. P. Kofinas, and C. Folke, editors. Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing world. Springer, London, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73033-2_5
11. Folke, C., Å. Jansson, J. Rockström, P. Olsson, S. R. Carpenter, F. S. Chapin III, A.-S. Crépin, G. Daily, K. Danell, J. Ebbesson, T. Elmqvist, V. Galaz, F. Moberg, M. Nilsson, H. Österblom, E. Ostrom, Å. Persson, G. Peterson, S. Polasky, W. Steffen, B. Walker, and F. Westley. 2011. Reconnecting to the biosphere. Ambio 40:719-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-011-0184-y
12. Government of Ecuador. 2011. Submission to the Fourteenth Session of the Ad Hoc Working Group on long-term cooperative action under the United Nations framework convention on climate change. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland. [online] URL: http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2011/awglca14/eng/misc02a02.pdf
13. Muradian, R., and L. Rival. 2012. Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services 1(1):93-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.009
14. Muradian, R., M. Arsel, L. Pellegrini, F. Adaman, B. Aguilar, B. Agarwal, E. Corbera, D. E. de Blas, J. Farley, G. Froger, E. Garcia-Frapolli, E. Gómez-Baggethun, J. Gowdy, N. Kosoy, J. F. Le Coq, P. Leroy, P. May, P. Méral, P. Mibielli, R. Norgaard, B. Ozkaynak, U. Pascual, W. Pengue, M. Perez, D. Pesche, R. Pirard, J. Ramos-Martin, L. Rival, F. Saenz, G. Van Hecken, A. Vatn, B. Vira, and K. Urama (2013). Payments for ecosystem services and the fatal attraction of win-win solutions. Conservation Letters. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00309.x
15. Parker, C., A. Mitchell, M. Trivedi, N. Mardas, and K. Sosis. 2009. The Little REDD+ Book: an updated guide to governmental and non-governmental proposals for reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation. Global Canopy Foundation, Oxford, UK. [online] URL: http://www.theredddesk.org/sites/default/files/lrb_en.pdf
16. Rival, L. 2010. Ecuador's Yasuní-ITT Initiative: the old and new values of petroleum. Ecological Economics 70:358-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.09.007
17. Rival, L. 2011. Planning development futures in the Ecuadorian Amazon: the expanding oil frontier and the Yasuní-ITT Initiative. Pages 155-173 in A. Bebbington, editor. Social conflict, economic development and extractive industry: evidence from South America. Routledge, New York, New York, USA.
18. Rival, L. 2012. Sustainable development through policy integration in Latin America: a comparative approach. Occasional paper 7. Social dimensions of green economy and sustainable development. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Geneva, Switzerland. [online] URL: http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/search/DA1744ED6C1FFD03C12579F3002A5769?OpenDocument
19. Rival, L., and R. Muradian 2012. Introduction. Pages 1-20 in R. Muradian and L. Rival, editors. Governing the provision of ecosystem services. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, and New York, New York, USA.
20. Ruprecht, N. 2011. Y-ITT: a policy for normative change hindered by political norms? Thesis in Global Governance and Diplomacy. University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Mimeo.
21. Seymour, F., and A. Angelsen. 2012. Summary and conclusions: REDD+ without regrets. Pages 317-334 in A. Angelsen, M. Brockhaus, W. D. Sunderlin, and L. V. Verchot, editors. Analysing REDD+: challenges and choices. CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia. [online] URL: http://www.cifor.org/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/3805.html
22. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2011. Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. [online] URL: www.unep.org/greeneconomy/NewGER/tabid/79054/language/en-US/Default.aspx
23. Viana, V. M. 2008. Bolsa Floresta: um instrumento inovado para a promoção da saúde em comunidades tradicionais na Amazônia [Bolsa Floresta: an innovative mechanism to promote health in traditional communities in the Amazon]. Estudos Avançados 22(64):143-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-40142008000300009
24. Viana, V. M. 2009. Solving the "REDD" puzzle. Amazonas Sustainable Foundation. Manaus, Brazil. [translated by Matthew D. Quinlan and Marina T. Campos]. [online] URL: http://ebookbrowse.com/desatando-o-n%C3%B3-traduzidoingl%C3%8As-pdf-d420594307
25. Viana, V. M. 2010. Sustainable development in practice: lessons learned from Amazonas. Environmental Governance No. 3. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK. [online] URL: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/17508IIED.pdf
26. Zang, A., and M. Sahm. 2012. REDD as a catalyst to drive sustainable land use. Pages 78-79 in G. Nichols-Roth, editor. Climate change: the new economy. The New Economy, Ltd., United Nations Environment Programme, London, UK. [online] URL: http://view.digipage.net/?id=rio20climatechange