Collaborative adaptive management: Challenges and opportunities

Ecology and Society

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2013, Pages

  Scarlett, Lynn ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Collaboration; Collaborative adaptive management; Conservation; Science and decision making

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; NATURE CONSERVATION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; TRADE-OFF; TWENTY FIRST CENTURY;

EID: 84884958876     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-05762-180326     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Allen, G. M. and E. M. Gould. 1986. Complexity, wickedness, and public forests. Journal of Forestry:20-23.
2. Brown, C. 1993. Handling confrontation: negotiated adaptive management. Working Paper 93-13, October 14, 1993(1). Conflict Resolution Consortium, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
3. Canter, L. W., and S. F. Atkinson. 2010. Adaptive management with integrated decision making: an emerging tool for cumulative effects management. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 28(4):287-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.3152/146155110X12838715793002
4. Cash, D. W., W. C. Clark, F. Alcock, N. M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D. H. Guston, J. Jager, and R. B. Mitchell. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Publications of the National Academies of Science (100)14:8080-8091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231332100
5. Code of Federal Regulations. Title 43: Public Lands: Interior Part 46-Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969. October 15, 2008.
6. Committee on Analysis of Global Change Assessments, National Research Council of the National Academies. 2007. Analysis of global change assessments lessons learned. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
7. Committee on Independent Scientific Review of Everglades Restoration Progress, National Research Council of the National Academies. 2006. Progress toward restoring the Everglades: the first biennial review-2006. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
8. Committee on Independent Scientific Review of Everglades Restoration Progress, National Research Council of the National Academies. 2012. Progress toward restoring the Everglades: the fourth biennial review-2012. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
9. Committee on Restoration of the Greater Everglades System, National Research Council of the National Academies. 2003. Adaptive monitoring and assessment for the comprehensive everglades restoration plan. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
10. Courtney, Steven. 2011. Science and decision making. Keynote presentation, Fifth Annual CAMnet Rendezvous, April 16-17, 2011, Keene, New Hampshire. Collaborative Adaptive Management Network, Meridian Institute, Dillon, Colorado, USA.
11. Craig, R. K., and J. B. Ruhl. 2013. Designing administrative law for adaptive management. Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper Number 13-6. Vanderbilt University Law School, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2222009
12. Crona, B., and J. Parker. 2011. Network determinants of knowledge utilization: preliminary lessons from boundary organizations. Science Communication 33(4):448-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547011408116
13. Curtin, C. 2010. The ecology of place and natural resource management: lessons from marine and terrestrial ecosystems. In I. Billick and M. Price, editors. The ecology of place: contributions of place-based research to ecological understanding. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
14. Doremus, H., W. L. Andreen, A. Camacho, D. A. Farber, R. L. Glicksman, D. Goble, B. C. Karkkainen, D. Rohlf, A. D. Tarlock, S. B. Zellmer, S. Jones, and Y. Huang 2011. Making good use of adaptive management. Center for Progressive Reform White Paper #1104, and UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2011-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1808106
15. Emerson, K., and P. Murchie. 2010. Collaborative governance and climate change: opportunities for public administration. In R. O'Leary, D. M. Van Slyke, and S. Kim, editors. The future of public administration, public management, and public service around the world: the Minnowbrook perspective. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
16. Foster, K. A. 2001. Regionalism on purpose. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
17. Hayek, F. A. 1945. The use of knowledge in society. American Economic Review 35(4):519-30.
18. Holling, C. S. editor. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley & Sons, London, UK.
19. Iverson, D. 1999. The forest service as a learning challenged organization. Eco-Watch Dialogues 2/5/1999.
20. Johnson, F., and K. Williams. 1999. Protocol and practice the adaptive management of waterfowl harvests. Conservation Ecology 3(1):8.
21. Lach, D., P. List, B. Steel, and B. Shindler. 2003. Advocacy and credibility of ecological scientists in resource decisionmaking: a regional study. BioScience 53(2):170-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0170:AACOES]2.0.CO;2
22. Lee, K. N. 1999. Appraising adaptive management. Conservation Ecology 3(2):3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/978-1420042597.sec1
23. Leong, K., D. J. Decker, T. B. Lauber, D. B. Raik, and W. F. Siemer. 2009. Overcoming jurisdictional boundaries through stakeholder engagement and collaborative governance: lessons learned from white-tailed deer management in the U. S. In K. Anderson, et al., editors. Beyond the rural urban divide: cross-continental perspectives on the differentiated countryside and its regulation. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, West Yorkshire, UK.
24. Matso, K. 2012. Producing science that gets used by coastal communities: what funders should do to link more science with decisions. Dissertation. University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA.
25. McKinney, M., L. Scarlett, and D. Kemmis. 2010. Large landscape conservation: a strategic framework for policy and action. Lincoln Institute for Land Policy, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
26. National Climate Assessment and Development Advisory Committee. 2013. Draft Third National Climate Assessment Report. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, D.C., USA.
27. Nichols, J. D. et al. 2011. Climate change, uncertainty, and natural resource management. The Journal of Wildlife Management (75):6-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.33
28. Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance. 2008. Department of the Interior Departmental Manual. Series: Environmental Quality Programs Part 522: Adaptive Management. Effective Date: 2/1/08. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., USA.
29. Panel on Strategies and Methods for Climate-Related Decision Support, National Research Council of the National Academies. 2009. Informing decisions in a changing climate. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
30. Pinkerton, E. 1999. Factors in overcoming barriers to implementing co-management in British Columbia salmon fisheries. Conservation Ecology 3(2):2.
31. Platte River Recovery Implementation Program. 2012. Adaptive management on the Platte River: 2012 state of the Platte report. Kearney, Nebraska, USA.
32. Scarlett, L. 2010. Climate change effects: the intersection of science, policy, and resource management in the USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29(3):892-903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1899/09-135.1
33. Selin, S., and D. Chavez. 1995. Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management 19(2): 189-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02471990
34. Sims, S. A., and J. Pratt Miles, editors. CAMNet fifth annual rendezvous, adaptive governance in the face of environmental and social change, April 16-17, 2011, Antioch University, Keene, NH. Summary. Collaborative Adaptive Management Network (CAMNet), Dillon, Ohio, USA.
35. Stern, P., and G. D. Brewer, editors. 2006. Decision making for the environment: social and behavioral science research priorities. Panel on Social and Behavioral Science Research Priorities for Environmental Decision Making. National Research Council. National Academies Press, Washington, D. C., USA.
36. Stern, P., and H. Fineberg, editors. 1996. Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. Committee on Risk Characterization, and Committee on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
37. Susskind, L. 2010. Complexity science and collaborative decision making. Negotiation Journal 26:367-376. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.2010.00278.x
38. Susskind, L., A. E. Camacho, and T. Schenk. 2012. A critical assessment of collaborative adaptive management in practice. Journal of Applied Ecology 49:47-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02070.x
39. Susskind, L., and J. L. Cruickshank. 1987. Beyond impasse: consensual approaches to resolving public disputes. Basic Books, New York, New York, USA.
40. Sustainable Ecosystems Institute. 2007. Everglades multispecies avian ecology and restoration review, final report. Portland, Oregon, USA.
41. Thomas, J. C. 2012. Citizen, customer, partner: engaging the public in public management. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, New York, New York, USA.
42. Thomson, A. M., J. L. Perry, and T. K. Miller. 2007. Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(1):23-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum036
43. van Maasskers, T. 2009. How can practitioners analyze and engage in science-intensive public disputes? Thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
44. Walters, C. 1997. Challenges in adaptive management of riparian and coastal ecosystems. Conservation Ecology 1(2):1.
45. Water Resources Development Act of 2000, 114 Statute 2572, Public Law 106-541-December 11, 2000.
46. Williams, B. K., R. C. Szaro, and C. D. Shapiro. 2009. Adaptive management: the U.S. Department of the Interior technical guide. Adaptive Management Working Group, U. S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C., USA.