Outpatient general anesthesia: A comparison of a combination of midazolam plus propofol and propofol alone

Journal of Clinical Anesthesia

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 130-137

  Reinhart, Douglas J ^a,g   Grum, Daniel R ^b   Berry, James ^c   Lensch, David ^d   Marchbanks, C Randall ^e   Zsigmond, Elemer ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d Wilmington SurgiCare   (United States)

^e Pharmaceutical Product Development   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^g McKay Dee Hospital Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Anesthesia; induction, intravenous, outpatient; midazolam; propofol

Indexed keywords

MIDAZOLAM; NITROUS OXIDE; OPIATE; PLACEBO; PROPOFOL; SUXAMETHONIUM; VECURONIUM;

ADULT; AGED; AMBULATORY SURGERY; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ANESTHETIC RECOVERY; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL TOXICITY; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEADACHE; HUMAN; INHALATIONAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; INTRAVENOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; VERTIGO;

EID: 0030965025     PISSN: 09528180     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0952-8180(97)00237-7     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Smith I, White PF, Nathanson M, Gouldson R: Propofol. An update on its clinical use. Anesthesiology 1994;81:1005-43.
2. Millar JM, Jewkes CF: Recovery and morbidity after daycase anaesthesia. A comparison of propofol with thiopentone-enflurane with and without alfentanil. Anaesthesia 1988;43:738-43.
3. Puttick N, Rosen M: Propofol induction and maintenance with nitrous oxide in paediatric outpatient dental anaesthesia. A comparison with thiopentone-nitrous oxide-halothane. Anaesthesia 1988;43:646-9.
4. Gold MI, Sacks DJ, Grosnoff DB, Herrington CA: Comparison of propofol with thiopental and isoflurane for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 1989;1:272-6.
5. Korttila K, Ostman P, Faure E, et al: Randomized comparison of recovery after propofol-nitrous oxide versus thiopentone-isoflurane-nitrous oxide anaesthesia in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1990;34:400-3.
6. Lim BL, Low TC: Total intravenous anaesthesia versus inhalation anaesthesia for dental day surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care 1992;20: 475-8.
7. Marais ML, Maher MW, Wetchler BV, Korttila K, Apfelbaum JL: Reduced demands on recovery room resources with propofol (Diprivan) compared to thiopental-isoflurane. Anesthesiol Rev 1989;XVI:29-40.
8. Sung YF, Reiss N, Tillette T: The differential cost of anesthesia and recovery with propofol-nitrous oxide anesthesia versus thiopental-sodium-nitrous oxide anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 1991;3: 391-4.
9. Short TG, Plummer JL, Chui PT: Hypnotic and anaesthetic interactions between midazolam, propofol, and alfentanil. Br J Anaesth 1992;69:162-7.
10. McClune S, McKay AC, Wright PM, Patterson CC, Clarke RS: Synergistic interaction between midazolam and propofol. Br J Anaesth 1992;69:240-5.
11. Teh J, Short TG, Wong J, Tan P: Pharmacokinetic interactions between midazolam and propofol: an infusion study. Br J Anaesth 1994;72:62-5.
12. Short TG, Chui PT: Propofol and midazolam act synergistically in combination. Br J Anaesth 1991;67:539-45.
13. Vinik HR, Bradley EL Jr, Kissin I: Triple anesthetic combination: propofol-midazolam-alfentanil. Anesth Analg 1994;78:354-8.
14. Aldrete JA, Kroulik D: A postanesthetic recovery score. Anesth Analg 1970;49:924-34.
15. Searle NR, Sahab P: Propofol in patients with cardiac disease. Can J Anaesth 1993;40:730-47.
16. 2O in humans. Anesthesiology 1988;68:157-63.
17. Larson JS, Lunn JL: Comparing drugs for short-term sedation. Contemp Intern Med 1994;6:55-60.
18. Bailey PL, Pace NL, Ashburn MA, Moll JW, East KA, Stanley TH: Frequent hypoxemia and apnea after sedation with midazolam and fentanyl. Anesthesiology 1990;73:826-30.
19. Atanassoff PG, Alon E, Pasch T: Recovery after propofol, midazolam, and methohexitone as an adjunct to epidural anaesthesia for lower abdominal surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1993;10:313-18.
20. Crawford M, Pollock J, Anderson K, Glavin RJ, MacIntyre D, Vernon D: Comparison of midazolam with propofol for sedation in outpatient bronchoscopy. Br J Anaesth 1993;70:419-22.
21. Stephens AJ, Sapsford DJ, Curzon ME: Intravenous sedation for handicapped dental patients: a clinical trial of midazolam and propofol. Br Dent J 1993;175:20-5.
22. Wilson E, David A, MacKenzie N, Grant IS: Sedation during spinal anaesthesia: comparison of propofol and midazolam. Br J Anaesth 1990;64:48-52.
23. Patterson KW, Casey PB, Murray JP, O'Boyle CA, Cunningham AJ: Propofol sedation for outpatient upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: comparison with midazolam. Br J Anaesth 1991;67:108-11.
24. Ferrari LR, Donlon JV: A comparison of propofol, midazolam, and methohexital for sedation during retrobulbar and peribulbar block. J Clin Anesth 1992;4:93-6.
25. Clarkson K, Power CK, O'Connell F, Pathmarkanthan S, Burke CM: A comparative evaluation of propofol and midazolam as sedative agents in fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1993;104:1029-31.