Tests of race models for reaction time in experiments with asynchronous redundant signals

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 367-381

  Ulrich, Rolf ^a   Miller, Jeff ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WUPPERTAL   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031498421     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmps.1997.1181     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ashby F. G., Townsend J. T. Varieties of perceptual independence. Psychological Review. 93:1986;154-179.
2. Baron J. The threshold for successiveness. Perception & Psychophysics. 10:1971;201-207.
3. Blake R. R., Martens W., Garrett A., Westendorf D. Estimating probability summation for binocular reaction time data. Perception & Psychophysics. 27:1980;375-378.
4. Colonius H. Possibly dependent probability summation of reaction time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 34:1990;253-275.
5. Diederich A. Intersensory facilitation. 1992;Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
6. Diederich A. Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: Evaluation of counter and diffusion coactivation models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 39:1995;197-215.
7. Diederich A., Colonius H. Intersensory facilitation in the motor component? A reaction time analysis. Psychological Research. 49:1987;23-29.
8. Diederich A., Colonius H. A further test of the superposition model for the redundant signals effect in bimodal detection. Perception & Psychophysics. 50:1991;83-86.
9. Efron R. The duration of the present. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 138:1967;713-729.
10. Giray M., Ulrich R. Motor coactivation revealed by response force in divided and focused attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 19:1993;1278-1291.
11. Grice G. R., Canham L., Boroughs J. M. Combination rule for redundant information in reaction time tasks with divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics. 35:1984;451-463.
12. Grice G. R., Reed J. M. What makes targets redundant? Perception & Psychophysics. 51:1992;437-442.
13. Heath R. A. Response time and temporal oder judgement in vision. Australian Journal of Psychology. 36:1984;21-34.
14. Hershenson M. Reaction time as a measure of intersensory facilitation. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 63:1962;289-293.
15. Kahneman D. Attention and effort. 1973;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
16. Luce R. D. Response times: Their role in inferring elementary mental organization. 1986;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. Meijers L., Eijkman E. Distributions of simple RT with single and double stimuli. Perception & Psychophysics. 22:1977;41-48.
18. Miller J. O. Multidimensional same-different judgments: Evidence against independent comparisons of dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 4:1978;411-422.
19. Miller J. O. Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals. Cognitive Psychology. 14:1982;247-279.
20. Miller J. O. Timecourse of coactivation in bimodal divided attention. Perception & Psychophysics. 40:1986;331-343.
21. Miller J. O. Channel interaction and the redundant targets effect in bimodal divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;160-169.
22. Mordkoff J. T., Miller J. O. Redundancy gains and coactivation with two different targets: The problem of target preferences and the effects of display frequency. Perception & Psychophysics. 53:1993;527-535.
23. Mordkoff J. T., Miller J. O., Roch A. C. Absence of coactivation in the motor component: Evidence from psychophysiological measures of target detection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 22:1996;25-41.
24. Mordkoff J. T., Yantis S. An interactive race model of divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 17:1991;520-538.
25. Navon D., Gopher D. On the economy of the human information processing system. Psychological Review. 86:1979;214-255.
26. Neely J. H. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 106:1977;226-254.
27. Norman D. A., Bobrow D. G. On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cognitive Psychology. 7:1975;44-64.
28. Raab D. H. Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences. 24:1962;574-590.
29. Schwarz W. A new model to explain the redundant-signals effect. Perception & Psychophysics. 46:1989;498-500.
30. Schwarz W. Diffusion, superposition, and the redundant-targets effect. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 38:1994;504-520.
31. Schwarz W. Further test of the interactive race model of divided attention: The effects of negative bias and varying stimulus - onset asynchronies. Psychological Research. 58:1996;233-245.
32. Sternberg S., Knoll R. L. The perception of temporal order: Fundamental issues and a general model. Attention and Performance. 1973;Academic Press, New York. p. 629-685.
33. Todd J. Reaction to multiple stimuli. Archives of Psychology. 3:1912;1-65.
34. Townsend J. T., Ashby F. G. Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. Castellan J., Restle F. Cognitive theory. 1978;200-239 Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
35. Townsend J. T., Ashby F. G. The stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. 1983;Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
36. Townsend J. T., Nozawa G. Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: An investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories. Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 39:1995;321-359.
37. Ulrich R., Giray M. Separate-activation models with variable base times: Testability and checking of cross-channel dependency. Perception & Psychophysics. 39:1986;248-259.
38. Vorberg D. Unerwartete Folgen von zufälliger Variabilität: Wettlauf-Modelle für den Stroop-Versuch. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie. 32:1985;494-521.