Lung cancer screening: State of the art

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 108, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 270-274

  Munden, Reginald F ^a   Godoy, Myrna C B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

LDCT; low dose CT; lung cancer; lung cancer screening; MDCT; pulmonary nodule

Indexed keywords

RADON;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; BRONCHOSCOPY; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SURVIVOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CYTOPATHOLOGY; FAMILY HISTORY; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMED CONSENT; LOW DOSE COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; LUNG CANCER; LUNG NODULE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PATIENT SELECTION; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVATE HEALTH INSURANCE; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIOLOGIST; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SECOND CANCER; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TEAMWORK;

LDCT; LOW-DOSE CT; LUNG CANCER; LUNG CANCER SCREENING; MDCT; PULMONARY NODULE;

DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; HUMANS; LUNG NEOPLASMS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; SOLITARY PULMONARY NODULE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84884909684     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: 10969098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23388     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Wood DE, Eapen GA, Ettinger DS, et al.: Lung cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2012; 10: 240-265.
2. Association AL: Providing guidance on lung cancer screening to patients and physicians. InAmerican Lung Association, 2012.
3. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, et al.: Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: A systematic review. JAMA 2012; 307: 2418-2429.
4. Jacobson FL, Austin JH, Field JK, et al.: Development of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for low-dose computed tomography scans to screen for lung cancer in North America: Recommendations of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Task Force for Lung Cancer Screening and Surveillance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 25-32.
5. Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JH, et al.: The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144: 33-38.
6. BC/BS. BC/BS of Texas: General reimbursement information section: Medical policies. 2012.
7. Matthews AW, Health Blog:, Well point to cover lung CT scans for heavy smokers. In:Health Blog: Wall Street Journal, 2011.
8. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al.: Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 395-409.
9. Hirsch FR:, Does lung cancer screening motivate smoking cessation ? Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2005; 2: 616-617.
10. Rosen MP, Corey J, Siewert B:, Establishing a computed tomography screening clinic. J Thorac Imaging 2012; 27: 220-223.
11. Duda C, Mahon I, Chen MH, et al.: Impact and costs of targeted recruitment of minorities to the National Lung Screening Trial. Clin Trials 2011; 8: 214-223.
12. Marcus PM, Lenz S, Sammons D, et al.: Recruitment methods employed in the National Lung Screening Trial. J Med Screen 2012; 19: 94-102.
13. Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC, et al.: The national lung screening trial: Overview and study design. Radiology 2010; 258: 243-253.
14. ACRIN-NLST. ACRIN/NLST CT Technique Comparison Chart. 2005.
15. Donnelly EF:, Technical parameters and interpretive issues in screening computed tomography scans for lung cancer. J Thorac Imaging 2012; 27: 224-229.
16. Larke FJ, Kruger RL, Cagnon CH, et al.: Estimated radiation dose associated with low-dose chest CT of average-size participants in the National Lung Screening Trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 1165-1169.
17. Hu XH, Ding XF, Wu RZ, et al.: Radiation dose of non-enhanced chest CT can be reduced 40% by using iterative reconstruction in image space. Clin Radiol 2011; 66: 1023-1029.
18. Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, et al.: A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 195: 1095-1099.
19. Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, et al.: Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest X-ray examination: Preliminary observations. Eur Radiol 2013; 23: 360-366.
20. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, et al.: Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: Initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010; 34: 40-45.
21. Brandman S, Ko JP:, Pulmonary nodule detection, characterization, and management with multidetector computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging 2011; 26: 90-105.
22. Armato SG, III, Li F, Giger ML, et al.: Lung cancer: Performance of automated lung nodule detection applied to cancers missed in a CT screening program. Radiology 2002; 225: 685-692.
23. Li F, Arimura H, Suzuki K, et al.: Computer-aided detection of peripheral lung cancers missed at CT: ROC analyses without and with localization. Radiology 2005; 237: 684-690.
24. Godoy MC, Cooperberg PL, Maizlin ZV, et al.: Detection sensitivity of a commercial lung nodule CAD system in a series of pathologically proven lung cancers. J Thorac Imaging 2008; 23: 1-6.
25. Yanagawa M, Honda O, Yoshida S, et al.: Commercially available computer-aided detection system for pulmonary nodules on thin-section images using 64 detectors-row CT: Preliminary study of 48 cases. Acad Radiol 2009; 16: 924-933.
26. Yuan R, Vos PM, Cooperberg PL:, Computer-aided detection in screening CT for pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 1280-1287.
27. Zhao Y, de Bock GH, Vliegenthart R, et al.: Performance of computer-aided detection of pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT: Comparison with double reading by nodule volume. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 2076-2084.
28. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al.: Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 395-409.
29. Grosu HB, Eapen GA, Jimenez CA, et al.: Lung cancer screening: Making the transition from research to clinical practice. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2012; 18: 295-303.
30. Revel MP, Merlin A, Peyrard S, et al.: Software volumetric evaluation of doubling times for differentiating benign versus malignant pulmonary nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 135-142.
31. Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H, et al.: Nodule management protocol of the NELSON randomised lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer 2006; 54: 177-184.
32. van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M, et al.: Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2221-2229.
33. Godoy MCB, Naidich DP:, Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: Recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology 2009; 253: 606-622.
34. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al.: Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: A statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 2005; 237: 395-400.
35. Munden RF, Erasmus JJ, Wahba H, et al.: Follow-up of small (4 mm or less) incidentally detected nodules by computed tomography in oncology patients: A retrospective review. J Thorac Oncol 2010; 5: 1958-1962.
36. Godoy MC, Naidich DP:, Overview and strategic management of subsolid pulmonary nodules. J Thorac Imaging 2012; 27: 240-248.