Nerve-sparing minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in cervical cancer patients

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 493-501

  Ghezzi, Fabio ^a   Cromi, Antonella ^a   Uccella, Stefano ^a   Bogani, Giorgio ^a   Sturla, Davide ^a   Serati, Maurizio ^a   Bolis, Pierfrancesco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

cervical cancer; laparoscopy; minilaparoscopy; needlescopic surgery; nerve sparing; radical hysterectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER STAGING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NERVE SPARING MINILAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PELVIS LYMPHADENECTOMY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

CERVICAL CANCER; LAPAROSCOPY; MINILAPAROSCOPY; NEEDLESCOPIC SURGERY; NERVE SPARING; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; ORGAN SPARING TREATMENTS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84884907951     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: 15533514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1553350612472986     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Uccella S, Siesto G, Zefiro F, Bolis P. Incorporating laparoscopy in the practice of a gynecologic oncology service: actual impact beyond clinical trials data. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 ; 16: 2305-2314
2. Martínez-Ramos D, Miralles-Tena JM, Cuesta MA, et al. Laparoscopy versus open surgery for advanced and resectable gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011 ; 103: 133-141
3. Medeiros LR, Stein AT, Fachel J, Garry R, Furness S. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for benign ovarian tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2008 ; 18: 387-399
4. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009 ; 27: 5331-5336
5. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Fusco A, Malzoni C. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 ; 16: 1316-1323
6. Park NY, Chong GO, Hong DG, Cho YL, Park IS, Lee YS. Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: long-term follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011 ; 21: 355-362
7. Liang Z, Chen Y, Xu H, Li Y, Wang D. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with fascia space dissection technique for cervical cancer: description of technique and outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2010 ; 119: 202-207
8. Sajid MS, Khan MA, Ray K, Cheek E, Baig MK. Needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg. 2009 ; 79: 437-442
9. Hosono S, Osaka H. Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2007 ; 17: 191-199
10. Yamamoto M, Minikel L, Zaritsky E. Laparoscopic 5-mm trocar site herniation and literature review. JSLS. 2011 ; 15: 122-126
11. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Colombo G, et al. Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 ; 12: 480-485
12. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, Zefiro F, Franchi M, Bolis P. Microlaparoscopy: a further development of minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer staging - initial experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2009 ; 113: 170-175
13. Tagaya N, Kubota K. Reevaluation of needlescopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012 ; 26: 137-143
14. Liao CH, Lai MK, Li HY, Chen SC, Chueh SC. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy using needlescopic instruments for adrenal tumors less than 5 cm in 112 cases. Eur Urol. 2008 ; 54: 640-646
15. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, et al. Needlescopic hysterectomy: incorporation of 3-mm instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Surg Endosc. 2008 ; 22: 2153-2157
16. Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Seshadri PA, Cadeddu MO, Poulin EC. Needlescopic surgery: a logical evolution from conventional laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2001 ; 15: 1208-1212
17. Nicolay LI, Bowman RJ, Heldt JP, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of traditional laparoendoscopic single-site surgery with needlescopic-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in the porcine model. J Endourol. 2011 ; 25: 1187-1191
18. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Siesto G, et al. Minilaparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: results of a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 ; 18: 455-461
19. Buda A, Fossati R, Colombo N, et al. Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the SNAP01 (Studio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian Collaborative Study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 ; 23: 4137-4145
20. Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol. 1974 ; 44: 265-272
21. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Ciravolo G, et al. Surgicopathologic outcome of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 ; 106: 502-506
22. Uccella S, Laterza R, Ciravolo G, et al. A comparison of urinary complications following total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy to open abdominal surgery. Gynecol Oncol. 2007 ; 107: S147 - S149
23. Uccella S, Ghezzi F, Mariani A, et al. Vaginal cuff closure after minimally invasive hysterectomy: our experience and systematic review of the literature. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011 ; 205: 119.e1-12
24. Janda M, Gebski V, Brand A, et al. Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 ; 11: 772-780
25. Walker JL, Piedmonte MR, Spirtos NM, et al. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2. J Clin Oncol. 2009 ; 27: 5331-5336
26. Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A. Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 ; 8: 171-179
27. Berci G. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using fine-caliber instruments: smaller is not necessarily better. Surg Endosc. 1998 ; 12: 197
28. Pamela D, Roberto C, Francesco LM, et al. Trocar site hernia after laparoscopic colectomy: a case report and literature review. ISRN Surg. 2011 ; 2011: 725601
29. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2002 ; 16: 458-464
30. Novitsky YW, Kercher KW, Czerniach DR, et al. Advantages of minilaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2005 ; 140: 1178-1183
31. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, Kehlet H, Rosenberg J. Pain after microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2000 ; 14: 340-344
32. Look M, Chew SP, Tan YC, et al. Post-operative pain in needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized trial. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001 ; 46: 138-142
33. Ditto A, Martinelli F, Mattana F, et al. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 ; 18: 3469-3478