Oncologic results and surgical morbidity of laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the treatment of figo stage ib cervical cancer: Long-term follow-Up

International Journal of Gynecological Cancer

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 355-362

  Park, Nae Yoon ^a   Chong, Gun Oh ^a   Hong, Dae Gy ^a   Cho, Young Lae ^a   Park, Il Soo ^a   Lee, Yoon Soon ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Autonomic nerve sparing; Cervical cancer; Laparoscopy; Radical hysterectomy; Stage IB

Indexed keywords

CISPLATIN; MITOMYCIN; VINCRISTINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CANCER COMBINATION CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC NERVE SPARING RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LONG TERM CARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METASTASIS; MORBIDITY; OPERATION DURATION; OVERALL SURVIVAL; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL RATE; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79956113919     PISSN: 1048891X     EISSN: 15251438     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IGC.0b013e31820731bb     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Sakamoto S, Takizawa K. An improved radical hysterectomy with fewer urological complications and with no loss of therapeutic results for cervical cancer. Ballieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1988;2:953-962. (Pubitemid 19063758)
2. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, et al. Type II versus type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;102:256-262. (Pubitemid 44041639)
3. Charoenkwan K, Srisomboon J, Suprasert P, et al. Nerve-sparing class III radical hysterectomy: a modified technique to spare the pelvic autonomic nerves without compromising radicality. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:1705-1712. (Pubitemid 44060404)
4. Fujii S, Takakura K, Matsumura N, et al. Anatomic identification and functional outcomes of the nerve sparing Okabayashi radical hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:4-13. (Pubitemid 47464555)
5. Maas CP, Moriya Y, Steup WH, et al. Radical and nerve-preserving surgery for rectal cancer in The Netherlands: a prospective study on morbidity and functional outcome. Br J Surg. 1998;85:92-97. (Pubitemid 28034121)
6. Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol. 1982;128:492-497. (Pubitemid 12037690)
7. Ameda K, Kakizaki H, Koyanagi T, et al. The long-term voiding function and sexual function after pelvic nerve-sparing radical surgery for rectal cancer. Int J Urol. 2005;12:256-263. (Pubitemid 40646697)
8. Querleu D, Narducci F, Poulard V, et al. Modified radical vaginal hysterectomy with or without laparoscopic nerve-sparing dissection: a comparative study. Gynecol Oncol. 2002;85:154-158. (Pubitemid 34304026)
9. Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:297-303. (Pubitemid 351722949)
10. Park NY, Cho YL, Park IS, et al. Laparoscopic pelvic anatomy of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Clin Anat. 2010;23:186-191.
11. Lee YS. Cervical and ovarian cancers: novel surgical applications. In: Conceptions of NSRH Under the Magnified View of Laparoscopy. The SGO Surgical Education Film Series [SGO DVD 003]. 2008.
12. Nam JH, Kim JH, Kim DY, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopico-vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92:277-283. (Pubitemid 38147404)
13. Havrilesky LJ, Leath CA, Huh W, et al. Radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for stage IB2 cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:429-434. (Pubitemid 38507613)
14. Yessaian A, Magistris A, Burger RA, et al. Radical hysterectomy followed by tailored postoperative therapy in the treatment of stage IB2 cervical cancer: feasibility and indications for adjuvant therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:61-66. (Pubitemid 38950499)
15. Chong GO, Park NY, Hong DG, et al. Learning curve of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with pelvic and/or para-aortic lymphadenectomy in the early and locally advanced cervical cancer: comparison of the first 50 and second 50 cases. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19:1459-1464.
16. Larson DM, Malone JM Jr, Copeland LJ, et al. Ureteral assessment after radical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;69:612-616. (Pubitemid 17034246)
17. Renaud MC, Plante M, Roy M. Combined laparoscopic and vaginal radical surgery in cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;79:59-63.
18. Pomel C, Atallah D, Le Bouedec G, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer: 8-year experience of a pilot study. Gynecol Oncol. 2003;91:534-539. (Pubitemid 38388146)
19. Raspagliesi F, Ditto A, Fontanelli R, et al. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a surgical technique for preserving the autonomic hypogastric nerve. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;93:307-314. (Pubitemid 38507594)
20. Quinn MA, Benedet JL, Odicino F, et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. FIGO 6th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;95:S43-S103.