Tier-based approaches for landslide susceptibility assessment in Europe

Landslides

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 529-546

  Günther, Andreas ^a   Reichenbach, Paola ^b   Malet, Jean Philippe ^c   van Den Eeckhaut, Miet ^d   Hervás, Javier ^d   Dashwood, Claire ^e   Guzzetti, Fausto ^b  

^a FEDERAL INSTITUTE FOR GEOSCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES BGR   (Germany)

^b CNR   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE STRASBOURG EOST   (France)

^d JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^e BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Common landslide susceptibility criteria; Europe; European soil; Heuristic Tier 1 assessment; Small scale landslide zoning; Statistical Tier 2 assessment; Thematic strategy

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; POPULATION STATISTICS; SOILS; ZONING;

EUROPE; HEURISTIC TIER 1 ASSESSMENT; LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY; SMALL SCALE; STATISTICAL TIER 2 ASSESSMENT; THEMATIC STRATEGY;

LANDSLIDES;

DECISION MAKING; GEOMORPHOLOGY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HAZARD MANAGEMENT; INVENTORY; LANDSLIDE; PRIORITIZATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH; VULNERABILITY;

EUROPE; FRANCE;

EID: 84884900513     PISSN: 1612510X     EISSN: 16125118     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10346-012-0349-1     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Asch K (2005) The 1: 5 million international geological map of Europe and adjacent areas (IGME 5000). Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, Hannover.
2. Ayalew L, Yamagishi H, Ugawa N (2004) Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted linear combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 1: 73-81.
3. Barredo JI, Benavides A, Hervás J, van Westen CJ (2000) Comparing heuristic landslide hazard assessment techniques using GIS in the Tirajana Basin, Gran Canaria Island, Spain. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinformation 2: 9-23.
4. Brabb EE (1984) Innovative approaches to landslide hazard mapping. Proc 4th Int Symp Landslides, Toronto, 1: 307-324.
5. BRGM (2005) The geological map of France 1: 1 million. Bureau de Recherches Géologiques et Minières, Paris.
6. Brown CE (1998) Applied multiple statistics in geohydrology and related sciences. Springer, New York.
7. Castellanos Abella EA, van Westen C (2008) Qualitative landslide susceptibility assessment by multicriteria analysis: a case study from San Antonio del Sur, Guantánamo, Cuba. Geomorphology 94: 453-466.
8. Chung C-JF, Fabbri AG (2003) Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Nat Hazard 30(3): 451-472.
9. Committee on the Review of the National Landslide Hazards Mitigation Strategy (2004) Partnerships for reducing landslide risk: assessment of the National Landslide Hazards Mitigation Strategy. National Academies, Washington.
10. Compagnoni B, Damiani AV, Valletta M, Finetti I, Cirese E, Pannuti S, Sorrentino F, Rigano C (eds) (1976-1983) Carta Geologica d'Italia. Servizio Geologico d'Italia, Stabilimento Salomone, Rome, scale 1: 500, 000, 5 sheets.
11. EC (2006a) Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. COM(2006)231 final. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium.
12. EC (2006b) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for the protection of soil and amending Directive 2004/35/EC. COM(2006)232 final. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, Belgium.
13. EC (2009) A community approach on the prevention of natural and man-made disasters. COM(2009) 82 final, 23. 2. 2009, Brussels, Belgium.
14. EC (2010) Risk assessment and mapping guidelines for disaster management. SEC(2010) 1626 final, 21. 12. 2010, Brussels, Belgium.
15. EC (2012) The implementation of the Soil Thematic Strategy and ongoing activities. Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2012) 46, Brussels, Belgium.
16. Eckelmann W, Baritz R, Bialousz S, Bielek P, Carre F, Houskova B, Jones RJA, Kibblewhite MG, Kozak J, Le Bas C, Toth G, Varallyay G, Yli Halla M, Zupan M (2006) Common criteria for risk area identification according to soil threats. European Soil Bureau Research Report No. 20, EUR 22185 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
17. Evans H, Pennington C, Foster C (2012). Mapping a nation's landslides: a novel multistage methodology. Proceedings of the 2nd World Landslide Forum, 3-9 October 2011, Rome, Italy (in press).
18. Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recog Lett 27: 861-874.
19. Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land use planning. Eng Geol 102: 85-98.
20. Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, New York.
21. Finke P, Hartwich R, Dudal R, Ibàñez J, Jamagne M, King D, Montanarella L, Yassoglou N (2001) Georeferenced soil database for Europe, Manual of procedures, Version 1. 1. European Soil Bureau Research Report No. 5, EUR 18092 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
22. Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugenics 7: 179-188.
23. Foster C, Gibson A, Wildman G (2008) The new national landslide database and landslide hazard assessment of Great Britain. Proceedings of the First World Landslide Forum, Tokyo, 18-21 November 2008, pp 203-206.
24. Glade T, Anderson MG, Crozier MJ (eds) (2005) Landslide risk assessment. Wiley, New York.
25. Gorsevski PV, Jankowski P, Gessler PE (2006) An heuristic approach for mapping landslide hazard by integrating fuzzy logic with analytic hierarchy process. Control Cybern 35(1): 121-146.
26. Günther A, van Den Eeckhaut M, Reichenbach P, Hervás J, Malet JP, Foster C, Guzzetti F (2012). New developments in harmonized landslide susceptibility mapping over Europe in the framework of the European Soil Thematic Strategy. Proceedings of the 2nd World Landslide Forum, 3-9 October, 2011, Rome, Italy (in press).
27. Günther A, Reichenbach P, Hervás J (2008) Approaches for delineating areas susceptible to landslides in the framework of the European Soil Thematic Strategy. Proceedings of the First World Landslide Forum, Tokyo, 18-21 November 2008, pp. 235-238.
28. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P (1994) Toward the definition of topographic divisions of Italy. Geomorphology 11: 57-74.
29. Guzzetti F, Tonelli G (2004) Information system on hydrological and geomorphological catastrophes in Italy (SICI): a tool for managing landslides and flood hazards in Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 4: 213-232.
30. Guzzetti F, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1994) The AVI Project: a bibliographical and archive inventory of landslides and floods in Italy. Environ Manag 18: 623-633.
31. Guzzetti F, Carrara A, Cardinali M, Reichenbach P (1999) Landslide hazard evaluation: an aid to a sustainable development. Geomorphology 31: 181-216.
32. Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Ardizzone A, Cardinali M, Galli M (2006) Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 81: 166-184.
33. Heineke HJ, Eckelmann W, Thomasson AJ, Jones RJA, Montanarella L, Buckley B (eds) (1998) Land information systems: developments for planning the sustainable use of land resources. European Soil Bureau Research Report No. 4, EUR 17729 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
34. Hervás J, Günther A, Reichenbach P, Chacón J, Pasuto A, Malet J-P, Trigila A, Hobbs P, Maquaire O, Tagliavini F, Poyiadji E, Guerrieri L, Montanarella L (2007) Recommendations on a common approach for mapping areas at risk of landslides in Europe. In: Hervás J (ed), Guidelines for mapping areas at risk of landslides in Europe. Proceedings Experts Meeting, Ispra, Italy, 23-24 October 2007. JRC Report EUR 23093 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
35. Hong Y, Adler R, Huffman G (2007) Use of satellite remote sensing data in the mapping of global landslide susceptibility. Nat Hazards 43: 245-256.
36. Jaedicke C, van Den Eeckhaut M, Nadim F, Hervás J, Kalsnes B, Smith T, Tofani V, Ciurean R, Winter M (2011) Identification of landslide hazard and risk "hotspots" in Europe. Geophysical Research Abstracts 13, EGU2011-10398.
37. Jenks GF (1967) The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int Yearb Cartogr 7: 186-190.
38. Kirschbaum DB, Adler R, Hong Y, Lerner-Lam A (2009) Evaluation of a preliminary satellite-based landslide hazard algorithm using global landslide inventories. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9: 673-686.
39. L'Abate G, Costantini EAC (2004). GIS pedoclimatico d'Italia. Progetto PANDA. Istituto Sperimentale Studio e Difesa del Suolo, Centro Nazionale Cartografia Pedologica. Firenze, Italia. CD-Rom (http://abp. entecra. it/soilmaps/ita/pedoclima3. html).
40. Mancini F (ed) (1966) Soil map of Italy. Società Geografica, A. GA. F-A. and R. Senatori Publisher, scale 1: 1, 000, 000.
41. Malet JP, Puissant A, Mathieu A, van Den Eeckhaut M, Fressard M (2012). Landslide susceptibility assessment at 1: 1 M scale for France. Geomorphology, 15p.
42. Malet JP, Thiery Y, Puissant A, Hervás J, Günther A, Grandjean G (2009) Landslide susceptibility mapping at 1: 1 M scale over France: exploratory results with a heuristic model. In: Malet J-P, Remaître A, Boogard TA (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on landslide processes: from geomorphologic mapping to dynamic modelling. CERG Editions, Strasbourg, pp 315-320.
43. Mason SJ, Graham NE (2002) Areas beneath the relative operating characteristics (ROC) and relative operating levels (ROL) curves: statistical significance and interpretation. Q J Royal Meteo Soc 128: 2145-2166.
44. MATE/METL (1999) Plan de Prévention des Risques (PPR)-Risques de Mouvements de terrain. Guide Méthodologique. Ministère de l'Aménagement du Territoire et de l'Environnement (MATE), Ministère de l'Equipement des Transports et du Logement (METL), La Documentation Française, Paris, 45 pp.
45. Metz CE (1978) Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med 8: 283-298.
46. Michie D, Spiegelhalter DJ, Taylor CC (eds) (1994) Machine learning, neural and statistical classification. Internet version (http://www. amsta. leeds. ac. uk/~charles/statlog/).
47. Mora S, Vahrson W (1994) Macrozonation methodology for landslide hazard determination. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 31(1): 49-58.
48. Nadim F, Kjekstad O, Peduzzi P, Herold C, Jaedicke C (2006) Global landslide and avalanche hotspots. Landslides 3: 159-173.
49. Nordregio (2004) Mountain areas in Europe: analysis of mountain areas in EU member states, acceding and other European countries. Brussels: Final Report EC Project No 2002. CE. 16. 0. AT. 136.
50. Panagos P, van Liedekerke M, Jones A, Montanarella L (2012) European Soil Data Centre: response to European policy support and public data requirements. Land Use Policy 29(2): 329-338.
51. Remondo J, González-Díez A, Díaz de Terán JR, Cendrero A, Fabbri A, Chung CJF (2003) Validation of landslide susceptibility maps; examples and applications from a case study in Northern Spain. Nat Hazards 30(3): 437-449.
52. Rudolf B, Beck C, Grieser J, Schneider U (2005) Global precipitation analysis products. Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach a. M.
53. Saaty T (1980) The analytical hierarchy process. McGraw Hill, New York.
54. Saaty T, Vargas LG (1984) Comparison of eigenvalue and logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios. Math Model 5: 309-324.
55. Schmidt-Thomé P (2006) Natural and technological hazards and risks affecting the spatial development of European regions. Geol Surv Finl Spec Pap 42: 17-63.
56. Trigila A, Iadanza C, Spizzichino D (2010) Quality assessment of the Italian Landslide Inventory using GIS processing. Landslides 7: 455-470.
57. van Den Eeckhaut M, Hervás J (2012) State of the art of national landslide databases in Europe and their potential for assessing landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk. Geomorphology 139-140: 545-558.
58. van Den Eeckhaut M, Hervás J, Jaedicke C, Malet JP, Montanarella L, Nadim F (2011) Statistical modelling of Europe-wide landslide susceptibility using limited landslide inventory data. Landslides. doi: 10. 1007/s10346-011-0299-z.
59. van Westen CJ, van Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2005) Landslide hazard and risk zonation: why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65: 167-184.
60. van Westen CJ, Castellanos E, Kuriakose SL (2009) Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazard and vulnerability assessment: an overview. Eng Geol 102: 112-131.
61. Varnes DJ (1978) Slope movements: types and processes. In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (eds) Landslide analysis and control, National Academy of Sciences, Transportation Research Board Special Report 176, Washington, pp 11-33.
62. Voogd H (1983) Multi-criteria evaluation for urban and regional planning. Pion, London.
63. Willmott CJ, Feddema JJ (1992) A more rational climatic moisture index. Prof Geogr 44(1): 84-88.
64. Yalcin A (2008) GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using analytical hierarchy process and bivariate statistics in Ardesen (Turkey): comparisons of results and confirmations. Catena 72(1): 1-12.