Reluctant Cities, Colonias and Municipal Underbounding in the US: Can Cities Be Convinced to Annex Poor Enclaves?

Urban Studies

Volumn 50, Issue 14, 2013, Pages 2959-2975

  Mukhija, Vinit ^a   Mason, David R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FINANCIAL PROVISION; INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; INSTITUTIONAL REFORM; LOCAL GOVERNMENT; LOW INCOME HOUSING; NEIGHBORHOOD; SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS; URBAN AREA;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84884828350     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098013482503     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abbott C.The Portland region: where city and suburbs talk to each other-and often agree.Housing Policy Debate. 1997;8 (1): 11-51.
2. Aiken C. S.Race as a factor in municipal underbounding.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1987;77 (4): 564-579.
3. Aiken C. S.A new type of Black ghetto in the plantation south.Annals of the Association of American Geographers. 1990;80 (2): 223-246.
4. Anderson M. W.Cities inside out: race, poverty, and exclusion at the urban fringe.UCLA Law Review. 2008;55:1095-1160.
5. Anderson M. W.Mapped out of local democracy.Stanford Law Review. 2010;62 (4): 931-1004.
6. Bobo L. D.,Oliver M. L.,Johnson J. H. J.,Valenzuela A. J.Prismatic Metropolis: Inequality in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2002:.
7. Booher D. E.,Innes J. E.Network power in collaborative planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2002;21 (3): 221-236.
8. California Farm Bureau Federation (2009) Imperial County Farm Bureau (www.cfbf./counties/?id=13; accessed 15 January 2011).
9. Committee Concerning Community Improvement et al. vs City of Modesto (2009) Nos. 07-16715, 07-17407, D.C. No. CV-04-06121-LJO-DLB, pp. 14361-14402.
10. County of Imperial (1996) Agricultural element, Imperial Valley general plan (www.icpds.com/?pid=831; accessed 15 January 2011).
11. Dreier P.,Mollenkopf J.,Swanstrom T.Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-first Century. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas; 2005:.
12. Edwards M. M.Understanding the complexities of annexation.Journal of Planning Literature. 2008;23 (2): 119-135.
13. Edwards M. M.Municipal annexation: does state policy matter?.Land Use Policy. 2011;28:325-333.
14. El Paso's 10,000: 'third world' lurks on the outskirts of Sun City.El Paso Herald Post. 1987;:.
15. Feiock R. C.Rational choice and regional governance.Journal of Urban Affairs. 2007;29 (1): 47-63.
16. Fogelson R. M.The Fragmented Metropolis: Los Angeles, 1850-1930. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1993:.
17. Forester J.Planning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1988:.
18. Fulton W.Guide to California Planning. Point Arena, CA: Solano Press Books; 1999:.
19. Gillette C. P.Regionalization and interlocal bargains.New York University Law Review. 2001;76:190-271.
20. Gillette C. P.The conditions of interlocal cooperation.Journal of Law & Politics. 2005;21:365.
21. Hagman D. G.The use of boundary lines to discriminate in the provision of services by race.University of Detroit Journal of Urban Law. 1976;54:849-897.
22. Healey P.Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning.Environment and Planning A. 1998;30 (9): 1531-1546.
23. HUD (US Department of Housing and Urban Development) (2003) Notice CPD-03-10:use of HUD resources to assist colonias (www.hud.gov/offices/cpd/lawsregs/notices/2003/03-10.pdf; accessed 5 March 2013).
24. Colonias master plan. El Centro, CA: ICCED; 2003:.
25. Imperial County LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission) (2009) LAFCO-about LAFCO (www.iclafco.com/about-lafco/; accessed 15 January 2011).
26. Johnson J. H.,Parnell A.,Joyner A. M.,Christman C. J.,Marsh B.Racial apartheid in a small North Carolina town.The Review of Black Political Economy. 2004;31 (4): 89-107.
27. Reflections on Regionalism. Katz B., ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2000:.
28. Leavitt J.The use of boundary lines to discriminate in the provision of housing by race.University of Detroit Journal of Urban Law. 1976;54:899-957.
29. Lichter D. T.,Parisi D.,Grice S. M.,Taquino M.Municipal underbounding: annexation and racial exclusion in small southern towns.Rural Sociology. 2007;72 (1): 47-68.
30. LudlowR. (2003) Racism colors water service, The Columbus Dispatch, 21June (www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/extras/coalrun_06212003.html; accessed 12 December 2010).
31. LudlowR. (2004) Finally, water has no color, The Columbus Dispatch, 18February (www.dispatch.com/live/content/local_news/stories/extras/coalrun_02182004.html; accessed 12 December 2010).
32. Marsh B.,Parnell A.,Joyner A.Institutionalization of racial inequality in local political geographies.Urban Geography. 2010;31 (5): 691-709.
33. Moeser J. V.,Dennis R. M.Politics of Annexation: Oligarchic Power in a Southern City. Rochester, VT: Schenkman Books; 1982:.
34. Mukhija V.,Monkkonen P.Federal colonias policy in California: too broad and too narrow.Housing Policy Debate. 2006;17 (4): 755-780.
35. National Fair Housing Advocate (2003) Ohio county awards $730,000 water contract after African Americans get favorable civil rights ruling (www.fairhousing.com/index.cfm?method=page.display&pagename=advocate_august03_page3; accessed 12 December 2010).
36. Orfield M.American Metropolitics: The New Suburban Reality. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2002:.
37. Palmer J. L.,Lindsey G.Classifying state approaches to annexation.State and Local Government Review. 2001;33 (1): 60-73.
38. Reynolds L.Rethinking municipal annexation powers.Urban Lawyer. 1992;24:247-303.
39. RomneyL. (2005) Poor neighborhoods left behind, Los Angeles Times, 18September (http://articles.latimes.com/2005/sep/18/local/memodesto18; accessed 15 January 2011).
40. Rubin V.,Chandler A.,Bernabei E.,Lizardo R. Framing paper for the first convening hosted by California Rural Legal Assistance and PolicyLink; 2007Fresno, California; 2007.
41. Rusk D.Cities without Suburbs. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press; 1995:.
42. Rusk D.Inside Game/Outside Game: Winning Strategies for Saving Urban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2001:.
43. Sengstock F. S.Annexation: A Solution to the Metropolitan Area Problem. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1960:.
44. SuddathC. (2008) Making water a matter of race, Time, 14July (www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1822455,00.html; accessed 12 December 2010).
45. Teaford P. J. C.City and Suburb: The Political Fragmentation of Metropolitan America, 1850-1970. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1979:.
46. University of North Carolina Center for Civil Rights (2006) Invisible fences (http://lcrm.lib.unc.edu/voice/works/w/invisible-fences; accessed 12 December 2010).
47. US Census Bureau (1983) General social and economic characteristics, Part 6 California, Section 1: Tables 56-155 (www.census.gov/prod/www/abs/decennial/1980cenpopv1.html; accessed 21 March 2011).
48. US Census Bureau (1995) County population census counts 1900-1990 (www.census.gov/population/www/censusdata/cencounts/index.html; accessed 25 January 2011).
49. US Census Bureau (2000) Census 2000 Summary File (SF 1) and Summary File 3 (SF 3) (www.census.gov/main/www/cen2000.html; accessed 19 November 2010).
50. Colonias: a third world within our borders. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1990:.
51. Ward P. M.Colonias and Public Policy in Texas and Mexico: Urbanization by Stealth. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press; 1999:.
52. Wilson S. M.,Heaney C. D.,Cooper J.,Wilson O.Built environment issues in unserved and underserved African-American neighborhoods in North Carolina.Environmental Justice. 2008;1 (2): 63-72.