Improvement of grafting efficiency in hard grafting grape Berlandieri hybrid rootstocks by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)

Scientia Horticulturae

Volumn 164, Issue , 2013, Pages 24-29

  Sabir, Ali ^a  

^a SELCUK UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Callus formation; Graft survival; Green grafting; PGPR

Indexed keywords

CALCAREOUS SOIL; CULTIVAR; FRUIT; GRAFTING; GROWTH RATE; RHIZOBACTERIUM; ROOTSTOCK; VITICULTURE;

EID: 84884726784     PISSN: 03044238     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2013.08.035     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ait-Barka E., Nowak J., Clément C. Enhancement of chilling resistance of inoculated grapevine plantlets with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium, Burkholderia phytofirmans Strain PsJN. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72:7246-7252.
2. Alam M.S., Cui Z., Yamagishi T., Ishi R. Rice cultivar variation in the growth response to inoculation of free-living rhizobacteria. Plant Prod. Sci. 2003, 6:50-51.
3. Aslantas R., Cakmakci R., Sahin F. Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on young apple tree growth and fruit yield under orchard conditions. Sci. Hortic. 2007, 111:371-377.
4. Baydar N.G., Ece M. Comparison of different scion/rootstock combinations in the production of grafted grapevines in Isparta condition. J. Sul. Dem. Univ. Nat. Sci. Enst. 2005, 9:49-53.
5. Bouquet A., Hevin M. Green-grafting between Muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia Michx.) and bunch grapes (Euvitis spp.) as a tool for physiological an pathological investigations. Vitis 1978, 17:134-138.
6. Compant S., Reiter B., Sessitsch A., Nowak J., Clement E., Ait Barka E. Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by plant growth promoting bacterium Burkholderia sp. strain PsJN. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:1685-1693.
7. Compant S., Kaplan H., Sessitsch A., Nowak J., Ait Barka E., Clement C. Endophytic colonization of Vitis vinifera L. by Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN: from the rhizosphere to inflorescence tissues. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 63:84-93.
8. Compant S., Mitter B., Colli-Mull J.G., Gangl H., Sessitsch A. Endophytes of grapevine flowers, berries, and seeds: identification of cultivable bacteria, comparison with other plant parts, and visualization of niches of colonization. Microb. Ecol. 2011, 62:188-197.
9. Esitken A., Karlidag H., Ercisli S., Turan M., Sahin F. The effects of spraying a growth promoting bacterium on the yield, growth and nutrient element composition of leaves of apricot (Prunus armeniaca L. cv. Hacihaliloglu). Aust. J. Agr. Res. 2003, 54:377-380.
10. Esitken A., Pirlak P., Turan M., Sahin F. Effects of floral and foliar application of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on yield, growth of nutrition of sweet cherry. Sci. Hortic. 2006, 110:324-327.
11. Esitken A. Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in horticultural crops. Bacteria in Agrobiology: Crop Ecosystems 2011, 189-235. Springer Pub. D.K. Maheshwari (Ed.).
12. Frankenberger W.T., Arshad M. Phytohormones in Soils: Microbial Production and Function 1995, Marcel Dekker, New York, NY.
13. Gambetta G.A., Rost T.L., Matthews M.A. Passive parhogen movement via open xylem conduits in grapevive graft unions. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 2009, 60:241-245.
14. Gray E.J., Smith D.L. Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2005, 37:3945-4412.
15. Grichko V.P., Glick B.R. Amelioration of flooding stree by ACC deaminasecontaining plant growth-promoting bacteria. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2001, 39:11-17.
16. Hartman H.T., Kester D.C., Davis F.T. Plant Propagation Principles and Practices 1990, 647. Rajets/Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
17. Karakurt H., Aslantas R. Effects of some plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains on plant growth and leaf nutrient content of apple. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 2010, 18:101-110.
18. Kaserer H., Leonhardt W., Grahsl A., Gangl H. Report on efficient scheme to develop certified clonal propagating material in Austria. Acta Hortic. 2003, 603:127-129.
19. Kose C., Guleryuz M., Sahin F., Demirtas I. Effects of some plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on graft union of grapevine. J. Sustain. Agr. 2005, 26:139-147.
20. Koshita Y., Takahara T., Ogata T., Goto A. Involvement of endogenous plant hormones (IAA, ABA, GAs) in leaves and flower bud formation of satsuma mandarin (Citrus unshiu Marc.). Sci. Hortic. 1999, 79:185-194.
21. Lambrecht M., Okon Y., Broek A.V., Vanderleyden J. Indole-3-acetic acid a reciprocal signalling molecule in bacteria-plant interactions. Trends Microbiol. 2000, 298:8-9.
22. Lodewyckx C., Vangronsveld J., Porteous F., Moore E.R.B., Taghavi S., Mezgeay M., van der Lelie D. Endophytic bacteria and their potential applications. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 2002, 21:583-606.
23. Maheshwari D.K. Bacteria in Agrobiology: Crop Ecosystems 2011, 434. Springer, Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London/New York.
24. Martelli G.P., Savino V., Walter B. Indexing on Vitis indicators. Graft Transmissible Diseases of Grapevines 1993, 137-155. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. G.P. Martelli (Ed.).
25. Pathirana R., McKenzie M.J. A modified green-grafting technique for large-scale virus indexing of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Sci. Hortic. 2005, 107:97-102.
26. Piccolo S., Ferrano V., Alfonzo A., Settanni L., Ercolini D., Burruano S., Moshetti G. Presence of endophytic bacteria in Vitis vinifera leaves as detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Ann. Microbiol. 2010, 60:161-167.
27. Rosenblueth M., Martinez-Romero E. Bacterial endophytes and their interactions with hosts. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2006, 19:827-837.
28. Sabir A., Kara Z. Performance and success of green grafting technique in some American rootstocks. Alatarim 2004, 3:28-32.
29. Sabir A., Agaoglu Y.S. The effects of different IBA and NAA applications on grafting success of some cultivar/rootstock combinations in potted grape sapling production. Alatarim 2009, 8:22-27.
30. Sabir A. Comparison of green grafting techniques for success and vegetative development of grafted grape cultivars (Vitis spp.). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2011, 13:628-630.
31. Sabir A., Yazici M.A., Kara Z., Sahin F. Growth and mineral acquisition response of grapevine rootstocks (Vitis spp.) to inoculation with different strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2012, 92:2148-2153.
32. Ulger S., Sonmez S., Karkacier M., Ertoy N., Akdesir O., Aksu M. Determination of endogenous hormones, sugars and mineral nutrition levels during the induction, initiation and differentiation stage and their effects on flower formation in olive. Plant Growth Regul. 2004, 42:89-95.
33. Walker M.A., Meredith C.P. The genetics of resistance to grapevine fanleaf virus (GFV) in Vitis vinifera. Vitis 1990, 1990:228-238.
34. Walter B., Bass P., Legin R., Martin C., Vernoy R., Collas A., Vesselle G. The use of a green-grafting technique for the detection of virus-like diseases of the grapevine. J. Phytopathol. 1990, 128:137-145.
35. Yang J., Kloepper J.W., Ryu C.M. Rhizosphere bacteria help plants tolerate abiotic stress. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14:1-4.
36. Yin H., Yan B., Sun J., Jia P., Zhang Z., Yan X., Chai J., Ren Z., Zheng G., Liu H. Graft-union development: a delicate process that involves cell-cell communication between scion and stock for local auxin accumulation. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63:4219-4232.