Power generation plants with carbon capture and storage: A techno-economic comparison between coal combustion and gasification technologies

Applied Energy

Volumn 113, Issue , 2014, Pages 1461-1474

  Tola, Vittorio ^a   Pettinau, Alberto ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAGLIARI   (Italy)

^b SOTACARBO S P A   (Italy)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; Coal fired; Integrated gasification combined cycle; Process simulation; Ultra supercritical plant

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; COAL; COAL COMBUSTION; COAL GASIFICATION PLANTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GASIFICATION; GLOBAL WARMING; NITROGEN OXIDES; TECHNOLOGY;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; COAL-FIRED; INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE; PROCESS SIMULATIONS; SUPERCRITICAL;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COAL; COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT; COMBUSTION; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; GLOBAL WARMING; INCENTIVE; NUMERICAL MODEL; POWER GENERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SULFUR; SUSTAINABILITY;

NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS;

EID: 84884721677     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.09.007     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. 2 capture with coal-fired power plants: a methodology to assess and optimise solvent-based post-combustion capture systems. Chem Eng Res Des 2011, 89:1553-1571.
2. Lohwasser R., Madlener R. Economics of CCS for coal plants: impact of investment costs and efficiency on market diffusion in Europe. Energy Econ 2012, 34:850-863.
3. 2 capture and storage in coal fired oxygen fed entrained flow IGCC power plants. Fuel Process Technol 2008, 89:916-925.
4. EU Commission. Commission communication on sustainable power generation from fossil fuels: aiming from near zero emissions from coal after 2020. Summary of the impact assessment. Commission staff working document; 2006.
5. Zhu L., Fan Y. A real options-based CCS investment evaluation model: case study of China's power generation sector. Appl Energy 2011, 88:4320-4333.
6. Liang X., Reiner D., Li J. Perceptions of opinion leaders towards CCS demonstration projects in China. Appl Energy 2011, 88:1873-1885.
7. Viebahn P., Vallentin D., Höller S. Integrated assessment of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in the German power sector and comparison with the deployment of renewable energies. Appl Energy 2012, 97:238-248.
8. 2 capture from industrial CHPs. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:511-524.
9. de Coninck H., Stephens J., Metz B. Global learning on carbon capture and storage: a call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration. Energy Policy 2009, 37:2161-2165.
10. International Energy Agency World energy outlook 2012 2012, OECD/IEA, Paris (France).
11. Seebregts A., Groenenberg H. How may CCS technology affect the electricity market in North-Western Europe?. Energy Proc 2009, 1:4181-4191.
12. 2 capture: a technical and economic evaluation based on computational simulations. Fuel 2012, 101:244-253.
13. 2 capture for coal-fired power plants through dynamic modelling and simulation. Fuel 2012, 101:115-128.
14. 2 on existing and new Australian coal-fired power plants. Energy Proc 2011, 4:2005-2019.
15. 2 capture in coal-fired power plants - impact on plant performance. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:710-726.
16. 2 capture. Energy Proc 2009, 1:1411-1418.
17. 2 emissions of coal fired power plants by optimizing steam water cycle. Energy Proc 2011, 4:2074-2081.
18. Phillips JN, Wheeldon JM. Economic analysis of advanced ultra-supercritical pulverized coal power plants: a cost-effective CO2 emission reduction option? In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on advances in materials technology for fossil power plants, Santa Fe, USA, August 31-September 3, 2010.
19. Martelli E., Kreutz T., Carbo M., Consonni S., Jansen D. Shell coal IGCC with carbon capture: conventional gas quench vs. innovative configurations. Appl Energy 2011, 88:3978-3989.
20. Kunze C., Spliethoff H. Assessment of oxy-fuel, pre- and post-combustion-based carbon capture for future IGCC plants. Appl Energy 2012, 94:109-116.
21. 2 avoidance. Energy Convers Manage 2006, 47:2250-2259.
22. 2 removal. Energy 2008, 33:874-881.
23. Pettinau A., Ferrara F., Amorino C. Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for a CCS power generation plant integrated with a sub-bituminous coal mine in Italy. Appl Energy 2012, 99:32-39.
24. 2 emissions of coal-fired power plants. Appl Energy 2011, 88:3917-3929.
25. Pettinau A., Ferrara F., Amorino C. Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS project in Italy: a techno-economic analysis. Energy 2013, 50:160-169.
26. 2 capture. Fuel 2009, 88:2495-2506.
27. 2 capture and storage. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4444-4454.
28. 2. Energy 2007, 32:1163-1176.
29. Aspen Technology Inc. AspenPlus 7.3 user guide. Cambridge, United Kingdom; 2006.
30. GE Enter Software, llc. GateCycle 5.40. [accessed 09.04.13]. http://www.ge-mcs.com/en/bently-nevada-software/performance/gate-cycle.html.
31. 2 capture system. Fuel 2013, 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.06.005.
32. Susta M. Ultra-supercritical pulverized coal fired power plants. In: Proceedings of the annual international conference coal-gen 2006, Cincinnati, USA, August 16-18, 2006.
33. Sargent&Lundy llc. New coal-fired power plant - performance and cost estimates. Report N. SL-009808, Chicago, USA; 2009. http://www.epa.gov.
34. Yang Y., Wang L., Dong C., Xu G., Morosuk T., Tsatsaronis G. Comprehensive exergy-based evaluation and parametric study of a coal-fired ultra-supercritical power plant. Appl Energy 2013, 112:1087-1099.
35. Blum R, Bugge J. The European perspective and advancements for advanced USC steam power plants. In: Proceedings of 6th international conference on advances in materials technology for fossil power plants, Santa Fe, USA, August 31-September 3, 2010.
36. Bugge J., Kjaer S., Blum R. High-efficiency coal-fired power plants development and perspectives. Energy 2006, 31:1437-1445.
37. Natesan K., Park J.H. Fireside and steamside corrosion of alloys for USC plants. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32:3689-3697.
38. Noguchi Y., Hirokazu Okada H., Semba H., Yoshizawa M. Isothermal, thermo-mechanical and bithermal fatigue life of Ni base alloy HR6W for piping in 700°C USC power plants. Proc Eng 2011, 10:1127-1132.
39. Stenby E.W., Scheck R.W., Severson S.D., Horney F.A., Teixeira D.P. Fabric filters versus electrostatic precipitators. Environ Int 1981, 6:103-114.
40. Gomez A., Fueyo N., Tomas A. Detailed modelling of a flue-gas desulfurisation plant. Comput Chem Eng 2007, 31:1419-1431.
41. Zhang Q., Fan Y., Li W. Numerical simulation and experimental verification of chemical reactions for SCR DeNOx. Front Chem Eng China 2010, 4:523-528.
42. 2 process. Appl Catal Gen 1989, 54:36-37.
43. Asea Brown Boveri Environmental Systems. SNOX demonstration project. Final report, Knoxville, USA, July 1996. http://www.netl.doe.gov.
44. U.S. Department of Energy. SNOXTM flue gas cleaning demonstration project: a DOE assessment. Technical report DOE/NETL-2000/1125, Morgantown and Pittsburgh, USA; 2000. http://www.netl.doe.gov.
45. x control on energy-efficiency power generation. Energy Policy 2007, 35:3898-3908.
46. Rosenberg H. Topsoe wet gas sulphuric acid (WSA) technology - an attractive alternative for reduction of sulphur emissions from furnaces and converters. In: International platinum conference - platinum surges ahead, Sun City, South, Africa, October 8-12, 2006.
47. Kohl A.L., Nielsen R.B. Gas purification 1997, Gulf Publishing Company, Houston (USA). 5th ed.
48. 2 removal unit with AspenPlus. Energy 2004, 29:1241-1248.
49. 2 capture using MEA scrubbing: a flowsheet decomposition method. Energy Convers Manage 2005, 46:475-487.
50. 2 capture using equilibrium-staged model. Sep Purif Technol 2012, 94:97-103.
51. 2 absorption into MEA from atmospheric gas. Energy Proc 2012, 23:360-369.
52. 2 capture from power plants. Part I. A parametric study of the technical performance based on monoethanolamine. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:37-46.
53. 2 capture from power plants. Part II. A parametric study of the economical performance based on monoethanolamine. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2007, 1:135-142.
54. U.S. Department of Energy. National Energy Technology Laboratory. 2010 Worldwide gasification database. [accessed 11.04.13]. http://www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/coalpower/gasification/worlddatabase/index.html.
55. Zheng L., Furinsky E. Comparison of Shell, Texaco, BGL and KRW gasifiers as part of IGCC plant computer simulations. Energy Convers Manage 2005, 46:1767-1779.
56. U.S. Department of Energy. National Energy Technology Laboratory. Texaco gasifier IGCC base cases. Report PED-IGCC-98-001; 2000.
57. Emun F., Gadalla M., Majozi T., Boer D. Integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) process simulation and optimization. Comput Chem Eng 2010, 34:331-338.
58. 2 capture. Fuel Proc Technol 2011, 92:1685-1695.
59. Smith A.R., Klosek J. A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes. Fuel Proc Technol 2011, 70:115-134.
60. Tranier JP, Perrin N, Dubettier R. Air separation units for coal power plants. Carbon Capture J, June 22nd, 2011. [accessed 22.06.11]. http://www.carboncapturejournal.com.
61. 2S over acqueous methyldiethanolamine solutions. Fluid Phase Equil 2000, 172:261-267.
62. 2S absorption and desorption in an acqueous MDEA solution using a rate-based non-equilibrium approach. Chem Eng Process 2004, 43:701-715.
63. 2 in aqueous solutions of N-methyldiethanolamine. J Petrol Sci Eng 2007, 55:122-134.
64. GE Energy. Syngas turbine technology. Report GEA 18028; 2010.
65. 2 washing. Energy Convers Manage 1995, 36:797-800.
66. 2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost. Energy Policy 2009, 37:915-924.
67. Sun L., Smith R. Rectisol wash process simulation and analysis. J Clean Prod 2013, 39:321-328.
68. 2-capture for hard coal and lignite. Energy Convers Manage 2010, 51:2179-2187.
69. 2 sequestration cycle. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2:571-581.
70. 2, natural gas, geothermics and nuclear waste disposal. Appl Energy 2013, 101:393-412.
71. 2 in Italy. Energy 2011, 36:2968-2983.
72. 2 storage potential of deep saline aquifers: the case of Italy. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:327-335.
73. U.S. Department of Energy. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants - volume 1: bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity. Technical report DOE/NETL-2010/1397; 2010 http://www.energy.gov.
74. 2 co-production. Appl Energy 2012, 91:43-50.
75. Kessels J, Bakker S, Clemens A. Clean coal technologies for a carbon-constrained world. International Energy Agency, Clean Coal Centre, Report CCC/152, London; 2007.
76. Nalbandian H. Performance and risks of advanced pulverised coal plant. International Energy Agency, Clean Coal Centre, Report CCC/135, London; 2008.
77. Nexant Inc. Environmental footprints and costs of coal-based integrated gasification combined cycle and pulverized coal technologies. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Report EPA-430/R-06/006, Washington, DC, USA, July 2006.
78. Watson J. Advanced cleaner coal technologies for power generation: can they deliver? In: Proceedings of the 2005 BIEE academic conference: European energy - synergies and conflicts, Oxford, United Kingdom, September 22-23, 2005.
79. Bloomberg. [accessed 19.11.12 and 12.04.13]. http://www.bloomberg.com.
80. Agenzia delle Dogane (Italian Customs Agency). Aliquote d'imposta vigenti nel settore delle accise, Italian; 2010[accessed 19.11.12]. http://www.agenziadogane.it.
81. Hendriks C, Graus W, van Bergen F. Global carbon dioxide storage potential and costs. Ecofys report EEP-02001, Utrecht (The Netherlands); 2004.
82. Metz B., Davidson O., de Coninck H., Loos M., Meyer L. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
83. Gestore dei Mercati Energetici (GME S.p.A.). Relazione annuale 2011, Italian; 2012. [accessed 5.11.12]. http://www.mercatoelettrico.org.
84. 2 avoidance costs of existing versus new fossil fuel power plant. Energy Proc 2011, 4:1917-1924.
85. Li S., Zhang X., Gao L., Jin H. Learning rates and future cost curves for fossil fuel energy systems with CO2 capture: methodology and case study. Appl Energy 2012, 93:348-356.
86. Gerbelová H., Versteeg P., Ioakimidis C.S., Ferrão P. The effect of retrofitting Portuguese fossil fuel power plants with CCS. Appl Energy 2013, 101:280-287.