Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis

Energy

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 160-169

  Pettinau, Alberto ^a   Ferrara, Francesca ^a   Amorino, Carlo ^a  

^a SOTACARBO S P A   (Italy)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; Coal gasification; Sulcis coal; Ultra supercritical plant

Indexed keywords

CARBON CAPTURE; COAL COMBUSTION; COAL GASIFICATION; COAL STORAGE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; EMISSION CONTROL; PROFITABILITY;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; COAL BASINS; ECONOMIC PROBLEMS; IGCC TECHNOLOGY; INTEGRATED GASIFICATION COMBINED CYCLE PLANTS; POTENTIAL STORAGE SITES; PULVERIZED COAL COMBUSTION; SUPERCRITICAL; TECHNO-ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; TECHNO-ECONOMICS;

CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMBUSTION; DIFFUSION; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS;

ITALY;

EID: 84873126417     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.12.012     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. 2 capture with coal-fired power plants: a methodology to assess and optimise solvent-based post-combustion capture systems. Chem Eng Res Des 2011, 89:1553-1571.
2. Lohwasser R., Madlener R. Economics of CCS for coal plants: impact of investment costs and efficiency on market diffusion in Europe. Energ Econ 2012, 34:850-863.
3. 2 capture and storage in coal fired oxygen fed entrained flow IGCC power plants. Fuel Process Technol 2008, 89:916-925.
4. EU Commission Commission communication on sustainable power generation from fossil fuels: aiming from near zero emissions from coal after 2020 2006, Summary of the Impact Assessment. Commission Staff Working Document, Available at:. http://eur-lex.europa.eu.
5. 2 co-production. Appl Energy 2012, 91:43-50.
6. International Energy Agency World energy outlook 2010 2010, OECD/IEA, Paris.
7. 2 capture from industrial CHPs. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:511-524.
8. de Coninck H., Stephens J., Metz B. Global learning on carbon capture and storage: a call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration. Energy Policy 2009, 37:2161-2165.
9. Seebregts A., Groenenberg H. How may CCS technology affect the electricity market in North-Western Europe?. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:4181-4191.
10. 2 capture, storage, and utilization in Chinese Academy of Sciences. Fuel 2011, 10.1016/j.fuel.2011.08.022.
11. Terna S.p.A. Statistical data on electricity in Italy. 2009 annual report. Available at: , 2009. http://www.terna.it.
12. Pettinau A., Ferrara F., Amorino C. Techno-economic comparison between different technologies for a CCS power generation plant integrated with a sub-bituminous coal mine in Italy. Appl Energy 2012, 99:32-39.
13. Loria E., Pettinau A., Amorino C., Porcu M. Techno-economic feasibility study and environmental performance analysis of a power generation plant with CCS system. Proceedings of the fifth international conference on clean coal technologies (CCT 2011) 2011, Zaragoza, Spain.
14. Lund H., Mathiesen B.V. The role of carbon capture and storage in a future sustainable energy system. Energy 2012, 44:469-476.
15. 2 emissions. Energy 2012, 45:134-141.
16. 2 capture: a technical and economic evaluation based on computational simulations. Fuel 2012, 101:244-253.
17. 2 capture. Fuel 2009, 88:2495-2506.
18. Chen L., Yong S.Z., Ghoniem A.F. Oxy-fuel combustion of pulverized coal: characterization, fundamentals, stabilization and CFD modeling. Prog Energ Combust 2012, 38:156-214.
19. 2 recycle oxy-fuel combustion for high ash coals. Fuel 2012, 102:32-40.
20. Blume M., Bohn J.P., Goanta A., Spliethoff H. Reduction of the flue gas recirculation rate in oxycoal processes by means of non-stoichiometric burner operation. Energy 2012, 45:117-124.
21. Topsøe Haldor The Topsøe SNOX™ technology for cleaning of flue gas from combustion of petroleum coke and high sulphur petroleum residues 2006, Available at:. http://www.topsoe.com.
22. Schoubye P., Jensen F.E. SNOX™ flue gas treatment for boilers burning petcoke...makes petcoke more attractive for power and heat generation. Proceedings of the Petcoke Conference 2007, Orlando, Florida (USA).
23. U. S. Department of Energy. SNOXTM flue gas cleaning demonstration project: a DOE assessment. Technical report DOE/NETL-2000/112. Available at: , 2000. http://www.energy.gov.
24. 2 post-combustion capture. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:1051-1057.
25. 2 capture with chemical absorption: a state-of-the-art review. Chem Eng Res Des 2011, 89:1609-1624.
26. 2 capture. Energy 2010, 35:851-857.
27. Domenichini R. Costi di generazione elettrica da impianti con cattura dell'anidride carbonica. Proceedings of the 5th national conference zero emission Rome 2009, Roma, Italy, [Italian].
28. 2 capture and compression using pinch analysis. J Cleaner Prod 2010, 18:857-866.
29. 2 emissions of coal-fired power plants. Appl Energy 2011, 88:3917-3929.
30. Martelli E., Kreutz T., Carbo M., Consonni S., Jansen D. Shell coal IGCCS with carbon capture: conventional gas quench vs. innovative configurations. Appl Energy 2011, 88:3978-3989.
31. Cormos C.C., Cormos A.M., Agachi P.S. Techno-economical and environmental evaluations of IGCC power generation process with carbon capture and storage (CCS). Proceedings of the 21st European symposium on computer aided process engineering 2011, Chalkidiki, Greece.
32. Kessels J., Bakker S., Clemens A. Clean coal technologies for a carbon-constrained world 2007, International Energy Agency, Clean Coal Centre, London, Report CCC/152.
33. 2 capture systems. Appl Thermal Eng 2009, 29:1744-1751.
34. 2CPU) for CCS power plants. Fuel 2012, 101:254-263.
35. 2 sequestration cycle. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2:571-581.
36. Mazzotti M., Pini R., Storti G. Enhanced coalbed methane recovery. J Supercrit Fluids 2009, 47:619-627.
37. 2 storage capacity estimation of coal. Fuel 2012, 91:1-15.
38. 2 sequestration and caprock integrity. Fuel 2010, 89:2651-2664.
39. 2 geological storage by ECBM techniques in the Sulcis area (SW Sardinia Region, Italy). Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on clean coal technologies for our future 2005, Castiadas, Italy.
40. Pettinau A., Puddu C., Amorino C. Technical and economical analysis of a zero-emission power generation plant integrated with a sub-bituminous coal mine in South West Sardinia. Proceedings of the 24th annual international Pittsburgh coal conference 2007, Johannesburg, South Africa.
41. Cost and performance baseline for fossil energy plants - volume 1: bituminous coal and natural gas to electricity 2010, U. S. Department of Energy, Technical report DOE/NETL-2010/1397. Available at:. http://www.energy.gov.
42. Nalbandian H. Performance and risks of advanced pulverised coal plant 2008, International Energy Agency, Clean Coal Centre, London, Report CCC/135.
43. Nexant Inc Environmental footprints and costs of coal-based integrated gasification combined cycle and pulverized coal technologies July 2006, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA, Report EPA-430/R-06/006.
44. Watson J. Advanced cleaner coal technologies for power generation: can they deliver?. Proceedings of the 2005 BIEE academic conference: European energy - synergies and conflicts 2005, United Kingdom, Oxford.
45. 2. Energy 2007, 32:1163-1176.
46. Bloomberg website [accessed 30.06.11]. http://www.bloomberg.com.
47. Agenzia delle Dogane (Italian Customs Agency) Aliquote d'imposta vigenti nel settore delle accise 2010, Available at:, Italian [accessed 30/04/2011]. http://www.agenziadogane.it.
48. Terna S.p.A. Website , accessed February 2012. http://www.terna.it.
49. Hendriks C., Graus W., van Bergen F. Global carbon dioxide storage potential and costs 2004, Ecofys report EEP-02001, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
50. Metz B., Davidson O., de Coninck H., Loos M., Meyer L. IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage 2005, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
51. 2 capture and storage. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4444-4454.
52. 2 avoidance costs of existing versus new fossil fuel power plant. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:1917-1924.
53. Cormos C.C. Integrated assessment of IGCC power generation technology with carbon capture and storage (CCS). Energy 2012, 42:434-445.
54. Hammond G.P., Ondo Akwe S.S., Williams S. Techno-economic appraisal of fossil-fuelled power generation systems with carbon dioxide capture and storage. Energy 2011, 36:975-984.