Addressing ten questions about conceptual rainfall-runoff models with global sensitivity analyses in R

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 503, Issue , 2013, Pages 135-152

  Shin, Mun Ju ^a,b   Guillaume, Joseph H A ^b   Croke, Barry F W ^a,b   Jakeman, Anthony J ^b  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Identifiability; Rainfall runoff model; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

FREELY AVAILABLE SOFTWARE; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; IDENTIFIABILITY; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS;

CATCHMENTS; MODEL STRUCTURES; RUNOFF;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CATCHMENT; CLIMATE FORCING; DATA SET; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STREAMFLOW;

AUSTRALIA; AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY;

EID: 84884721323     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.047     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alam, F.M., McNaught, K.R., Ringrose, T.J., 2004. Using Morris' randomized OAT design as a factor screening method for developing simulation metamodels. In: Proceedings of the 36th Conference on Winter Simulation, Washington, DC, 2004, pp. 949-957.
2. Aliş Ö.F., Rabitz H. Efficient implementation of high dimensional model representations. J. Math. Chem. 2001, 29(2):127-142. 10.1023/A:1010979129659.
3. Anctil F., Perrin C., Andréassian V. Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2004, 19(4):357-368. 10.1016/S1364-8152(03)00135-X.
4. Andréassian V., Lerat J., Le Moine N., Perrin C. Neighbors: nature's own hydrological models. J. Hydrol. 2012, 414-415(11):49-58. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.007.
5. Andrews F.T., Croke B.F.W., Jakeman A.J. An open software environment for hydrological model assessment and development. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26(10):1171-1185. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.04.006.
6. Beck M.B. Water quality modeling: a review of the analysis of uncertainty. Water Resour. Res. 1987, 23(8):1393-1442. 10.1029/WR023i008p01393.
7. Blasone R.-S., Vrugt J.A., Madsen H., Rosbjerg D., Robinson B.A., Zyvoloski G.A. Generalized likelihood uncertainty estimation (GLUE) using adaptive Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling. Adv. Water Resour. 2008, 31(4):630-648. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2007.12.003.
8. Borgonovo E. Measuring uncertainty importance: investigation and comparison of alternative approaches. Risk Anal. 2006, 26(5):1349-1361. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00806.x.
9. Burnash, R.J.C., Ferral, R.L., McGuire, R.A., 1973. A Generalized Streamflow Simulation System: Conceptual Modeling for Digital Computers. Technical Report. U.S. Natl. Weather Serv., Sacramento, Calif.
10. Burnash R.J.C. The NWS river forecast system: catchment modelling. Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology 1995, 311-366. Water Resour. Publ., Highlands Ranch, Colorado. V.P. Singh (Ed.).
11. Campolongo F., Cariboni J., Saltelli A. An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2007, 22(10):1509-1518. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2006.10.004.
12. Campolongo F., Saltelli A. Sensitivity analysis of an environmental model: an application of different analysis methods. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe 1997, 57(1):49-69. 10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00021-5.
13. Cariboni J., Gatelli D., Liska R., Saltelli A. The role of sensitivity analysis in ecological modelling. Ecol. Model. 2007, 203(1-2):167-182. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.10.045.
14. Chiew F.H.S., Kirono D.G.C., Kent D.M., Frost A.J., Charles S.P., Timbal B., Nguyen K.C., Fu G. Comparison of runoff modelled using rainfall from different downscaling methods for historical and future climates. J. Hydrol. 2010, 387(1-2):10-23. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.025.
15. Chiew F.H.S., Peel M.C., Western A.W. Application and testing of the simple rainfall-runoff model SIMHYD. Mathematical Models of Small Watershed Hydrology and Applications 2002, 335-367. Water Resour. Publ., Colorado. V.P. Singh, D.K. Frevert (Eds.).
16. Croke B.F.W., Jakeman A.J. A catchment moisture deficit module for the IHACRES rainfall-runoff model. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2004, 19(1):1-5. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.09.001.
17. Edijatno, Nascimento N.O., Yang X., Makhlouf Z., Michel C. GR3J: a daily watershed model with three free parameters. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1999, 44(2):263-277. 10.1080/02626669909492221.
18. Evans J.P., Jakeman A.J. Development of a simple, catchment-scale, rainfall-evapotranspiration-runoff model. Environ. Modell. Softw. 1998, 13(3-4):385-393. 10.1016/S1364-8152(98)00043-7.
19. Hansen D.P., Jakeman A.J., Kendall C., Weizu G. Identification of internal flow dynamics in two experimental catchments. Math. Comput. Simul. 1997, 43(3-6):367-375. 10.1016/S0378-4754(97)00021-9.
20. Homma T., Saltelli A. Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe 1996, 52(1):1-17. 10.1016/0951-8320(96)00002-6.
21. Jakeman A.J., Hornberger G.M. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model?. Water Resour. Res. 1993, 29(8):2637-2649. 10.1029/93WR00877.
22. Jakeman A.J., Littlewood I.G., Whitehead P.G. Computation of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and identifiable component flows with application to two small upland catchments. J. Hydrol. 1990, 117(1-4):275-300. 10.1016/0022-1694(90)90097-H.
23. Kim H.S., Croke B.F.W., Jakeman A.J., Chiew F.H.S. An assessment of modelling capacity to identify the impacts of climate variability on catchment hydrology. Math. Comput. Simul. 2011, 81(7):1419-1429. 10.1016/j.matcom.2010.05.007.
24. Kucherenko S., Tarantola S., Annoni P. Estimation of global sensitivity indices for models with dependent variables. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2012, 183(4):937-946. 10.1016/j.cpc.2011.12.020.
25. Le Moine N., Andréassian V., Mathevet T. Confronting surface- and groundwater balances on the La Rochefoucauld-Touvre karstic system (Charente, France). Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44(3):W03403. 10.1029/2007WR005984.
26. Littlewood I.G., Marsh T.J. Re-assessment of the monthly naturalized flow record for the River Thames at Kingston since 1883, and the implications for the relative severity of historical droughts. Regul. River 1996, 12(1):13-26. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199601)12:1<13::AID-RRR364>3.0.CO;2-N.
27. Mathevet T., Michel C., Andréassian V., Perrin C. A bounded version of the Nash-Sutcliffe criterion for better model assessment on large sets of basins. Large Sample Basin Experiments for Hydrological Model Parameterization: Results of the Model Parameter Experiment - MOPEX 2006, vol. 307:211-219. IAHS Publ.
28. Morris M.D. Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 1991, 33(2):161-174. 10.1080/00401706.1991.10484804.
29. Moussu F., Oudin L., Plagnes V., Mangin A., Bendjoudi H. A multi-objective calibration framework for rainfall-discharge models applied to karst systems. J. Hydrol. 2011, 400(3-4):364-376. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.047.
30. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10(3):282-290. 10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
31. Norton, J.P., 2009. Selection of Morris trajectories for initial sensitivity analysis. In: 15th IFAC Symposium on System Identification (SYSID 2009). St. Malo, France. http://dx.doi.org/0.3182/20090706-3-FR-2004.00111.
32. Nossent J., Elsen P., Bauwens W. Sobol' sensitivity analysis of a complex environmental model. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26(12):1515-1525. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.08.010.
33. Peck E.L. Catchment Modeling and Initial Parameter Estimation for the National Weather Service River Forecast System. NOAA Tech. Memo. NWS HYDRO-31 1976, Hydrol. Res. Lab., Silver Spring, Md.
34. Perrin, C., 2000. Towards an Improvement of a Lumped Rainfall-Runoff Model through a Comparative Approach. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France (in French).
35. Perrin C., Michel C., Andréassian V. Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J. Hydrol. 2001, 242(3-4):275-301. 10.1016/S0022-1694(00)00393-0.
36. Perrin C., Michel C., Andréassian V. Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. J. Hydrol. 2003, 279(1-4):275-289. 10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7.
37. Petheram C., Rustomji P., Chiew F.H.S., Vleeshouwer J. Rainfall-runoff modelling in northern Australia: a guide to modelling strategies in the tropics. J. Hydrol. 2012, 462-463:28-41. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.12.046.
38. Podger, G., 2004. RRL Rainfall Runoff Library User Guide. Cooperative Research Centre for Catchment Hydrology. http://www.toolkit.net.au.
39. Porter, J.W., 1972. The Synthesis of Continuous Streamflow from Climatic Data by Modelling with a Digital Computer. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Civil Eng., Monash Univ., Clayton, Vic., Australia.
40. Porter J.W., McMahon T.A. Application of a catchment model in southeastern Australia. J. Hydrol. 1975, 24(1-2):121-134. 10.1016/0022-1694(75)90146-8.
41. Post D.A., Chiew F.H.S., Teng J., Viney N.R., Ling F.L.N., Harrington G., Crosbie R.S., Graham B., Marvanek S., McLoughlin R. A robust methodology for conducting large-scale assessments of current and future water availability and use: a case study in Tasmania, Australia. J. Hydrol. 2012, 412-413:233-245. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.02.011.
42. Pujol, G., Iooss, B., Janon, A., 2012. Package 'Sensitivity': Sensitivity Analysis. R Package Version 1.5. http://www.CRAN.R-project.org/package=sensitivity.
43. Pushpalatha R., Perrin C., Le Moine N., Andréassian V. A review of efficiency criteria suitable for evaluating low-flow simulations. J. Hydrol. 2012, 420-421:171-182. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.055.
44. Saltelli A. Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2002, 145(2):280-297. 10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00280-1.
45. Saltelli A., Annoni P. How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25(12):1508-1517. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.04.012.
46. Saltelli A., Chan K., Scott E.M. Sensitivity Analysis 2000, Wiley, New York.
47. Silberstein R.P., Aryal S.K., Durrant J., Pearcey M., Braccia M., Charles S.P., Boniecka L., Hodgson G.A., Bari M.A., Viney N.R., McFarlane D.J. Climate change and runoff in south-western Australia. J. Hydrol. 2012, 475:441-455. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.02.009.
48. Sobol I.M. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Matem. Modelirovanie 1990, 2(1):112-118. (in Russian).
49. Sobol I.M. Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models. Math. Model. Comput. Exp. 1993, 1(4):407-414.
50. Sobol I.M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math. Comput. Simulat. 2001, 55(1-3):271-280. 10.1016/S0378-4754(00), 00270-6.
51. Sun X.Y., Newham L.T.H., Croke B.F.W., Norton J.P. Three complementary methods for sensitivity analysis of a water quality model. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2012, 37:19-29. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.04.010.
52. Thyer M., Renard B., Kavetski D., Kuczera G., Franks S.W., Srikanthan S. Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: a case study using Bayesian total error analysis. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45(12):W00B14. 10.1029/2008WR006825.
53. van Griensven A., Meixner T., Grunwald S., Bishop T., Diluzio M., Srinivasan R. A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models. J. Hydrol. 2006, 324(1-4):10-23. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.09.008.
54. van Werkhoven K., Wagener T., Reed P., Tang Y. Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44(1):W01429. 10.1029/2007WR006271.
55. van Werkhoven K., Wagener T., Reed P., Tang Y. Sensitivity-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models. Adv. Water Resour. 2009, 32(6):1154-1169. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2009.03.002.
56. Vaze J., Post D.A., Chiew F.H.S., Perraud J.M., Viney N.R., Teng J. Climate non-stationarity - validity of calibrated rainfall-runoff models for use in climate change studies. J. Hydrol. 2010, 394(3-4):447-457. 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.09.018.
57. Viney N.R., Bormann H., Breuer L., Bronstert A., Croke B.F.W., Frede H., Gräff T., Hubrechts L., Huisman J.A., Jakeman A.J., Kite G.W., Lanini J., Leavesley G., Lettenmaier D.P., Lindström G., Seibert J., Sivapalan M., Willems P. Assessing the impact of land use change on hydrology by ensemble modelling (LUCHEM) II: ensemble combinations and predictions. Adv. Water Resour. 2009, 32(2):147-158. 10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.05.006.
58. Wang J., Li X., Lu L., Fang F. Parameter sensitivity analysis of crop growth models based on the extended Fourier Amplitude Sensitivity Test method. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2013, 48:171-182. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.06.007.
59. Wagener T., McIntyre N., Lees M.J., Wheater H.S., Gupta H.V. Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis. Hydrol. Process. 2003, 17(2):455-476. 10.1002/hyp.1135.
60. Yang J. Convergence and uncertainty analyses in Monte-Carlo based sensitivity analysis. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2011, 26(4):444-457. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.10.007.
61. Yapo P.O., Gupta H.V., Sorooshian S. Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data. J. Hydrol. 1996, 181(1-4):23-48. 10.1016/0022-1694(95)02918-4.
62. Yatheendradas S., Wagener T., Gupta H., Unkrich C., Goodrich D., Schaffner M., Stewart A. Understanding uncertainty in distributed flash flood forecasting for semiarid regions. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44:W05S19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007WR005940.
63. Ye W., Bates B.C., Viney N.R., Sivapalan M., Jakeman A.J. Performance of conceptual rainfall-runoff models in low-yielding ephemeral catchments. Water Resour. Res. 1997, 33(1):153-166. 10.1029/96WR02840.
64. Zhang Y., Chiew F.H.S. Relative merits of different methods for runoff predictions in ungauged catchments. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45(7):W07412. 10.1029/2008WR007504.