Neighbors: Nature's own hydrological models

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 414-415, Issue , 2012, Pages 49-58

  Andréassian, Vazken ^a   Lerat, Julien ^b   Le Moine, Nicolas ^c   Perrin, Charles ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

^c SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Paired catchments; Paired watersheds; Rainfall runoff modeling

Indexed keywords

HYDROLOGICAL MODELS; PAIRED WATERSHEDS; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; TIME STEP;

CATCHMENTS; RAIN; STREAM FLOW; TIME SERIES;

RUNOFF;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; CATCHMENT; NONLINEARITY; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; STREAMFLOW; TIME SERIES; WATERSHED;

FRANCE;

EID: 84855192899     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.10.007     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Alila Y., KuraŚ P.K., Schnorbus M., Hudson R. Forests and floods: a new paradigm sheds light on age-old controversies. Water Resour. Res. 2009, 45:W08416. 10.1029/2008WR007207.
2. Andréassian V. Waters and forests: from historical controversy to scientific debate. J. Hydrol. 2004, 291(1-2):1-27.
3. Andréassian, V., Trinquet, V., 2009. Generalized Kuczera Curves to Describe the Long-term Behaviour of Deforested Catchments, H2009: 32nd Hydrology and Water Resources Symposium. Engineers Australia, Newcastle, pp. 1150-1160.
4. Andréassian V., Parent E., Michel C. A distribution-free test to detect gradual changes in watershed behavior. Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39(9):1252. 10.1029/2003WR002081.
5. Archer D.R. The use of flow variability analysis to assess the impact of land use change on the paired Plynlimon catchments, mid-Wales. J. Hydrol. 2007, 347:487-496.
6. Bates C.G., Henry A.J. Forest and streamflow experiment at Wagon Wheel Gap, Colorado. Mon. Weather Rev. 1928, 30(Suppl.):1-79.
7. Bethlamy N. More streamflow after a bark beetle epidemic. J. Hydrol. 1974, 23:185-189.
8. Bosch J.M., Hewlett J.D. A review of catchment experiments to determine the effect of vegetation changes on water yield and evapotranspiration. J. Hydrol. 1982, 55:3-23.
9. Brown A., Zhang L., McMahon T.A., Western A.W., Vertessy R.A. A review of paired catchment studies for determining changes in water yield resulting from alterations in vegetation. J. Hydrol. 2005, 310:28-61.
10. Egbuniwe N., Todd D.K. Application of the stanford watershed model to Nigerian watersheds. Water Resour. Bull. 1976, 12(3):449-460.
11. Engler A. Untersuchungen über den Einfluß des Waldes auf den stand der Gewässer 1919, Kommissionsverlag Beer, Zürich, 626pp.
12. Eschner A.R., Satterlund D.R. Forest protection and streamflow from an Adirondack watershed. Water Resour. Res. 1966, 2(4):765-783.
13. Gupta H.V., Kling H., Yilmaz K.K., Martinez G.F. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. J. Hydrol. 2009, 377(1-2):8091.
14. Hewlett J.D. Principles of Forest Hydrology 1982, The University of Georgia Press, Athens, 183pp.
15. Kjeldsen T.R., Jones D.A. Estimation of an index flood using data transfer in the UK. J. Hydrol. Sci. 2007, 52(1):86-98.
16. KlemeŠ V. Of carts and horses in hydrologic modeling. J. Hydrol. Eng. 1997, 2(2):43-49.
17. Le Moine N., Andréassian V., Perrin C., Michel C. How can rainfall-runoff models handle intercatchment groundwater flows? Theoretical study over 1040 French catchments. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43:W06428. 10.1029/2006WR005608.
18. Lerat, J., 2009. Quels apports hydrologiques pour les modèles hydrauliques? Vers un modèle intégré de simulation des crues, PhD thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, 190pp.
19. Merz R., Blöschl G. Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. J. Hydrol. 2004, 287(1-4):95-123.
20. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part I - a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10:282-290.
21. Oudin L., Andréassian V., Perrin C., Michel C., Le Moine N. Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungaged catchments: a comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments. Water Resour. Res. 2008, 44:W03413. 10.1029/2007WR006240.
22. Oudin L., Kay A., Andréassian V., Perrin C. Are seemingly physically similar catchments truly hydrologically similar?. Water Resour. Res. 2010, 46:W11558. 10.1029/2009WR008887.
23. Perrin C., Michel C., Andréassian V. Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J. Hydrol. 2001, 242:275-301.
24. Perrin C., Michel C., Andréassian V. Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. J. Hydrol. 2003, 279:275-289.
25. Perrin C., Andréassian V., Michel C. Simple benchmark models as a basis for criteria of model efficiency. Large Rivers (Archiv für Hydrobiologie Suppl.) 2006, 17(1-2):221-244.
26. Schreider S.Y., et al. Detecting changes in streamflow response to changes in non-climatic catchment conditions: farm dam development in the Murray-Darling basin, Australia. J. Hydrol. 2002, 262(1-4):84-98.
27. Siriwardena L., Finlayson B.L., McMahon T.A. The impact of land use change on catchment hydrology in large catchments: The Comet River, Central Queensland. Aust. J. Hydrol. 2006, 326(1-4):199-214.
28. Skøien J.O., Blöschl G. Spatiotemporal topological kriging of runoff time series. Water Resour. Res. 2007, 43:W09419. 10.1029/2006WR005760.
29. Vandewiele G.L., Xu C.Y., Huybrecht W. Regionalisation of physically-based water balance models in Belgium. Application to ungauged catchments. Water Resour. Manage. 1991, 5:199-208.
30. Watson F., Vertessy R.A., McMahon T.A., Rhodes B., Watson I. Improved methods to assess water yield changes from paired-catchment studies: application to the Maroondah catchments. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2001, 143:189-204.