Scientific faith: Belief in science increases in the face of stress and existential anxiety

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 49, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1210-1213

  Farias, Miguel ^a   Newheiser, Anna Kaisa ^b   Kahane, Guy ^c   de Toledo, Zoe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Belief; Belief in science; Existential anxiety; Religious belief; Stress

Indexed keywords

EID: 84884718894     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Ano G.G., Vasconcelles E.B. Religious coping and psychological adjustment to stress: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology 2005, 61(4):461-480.
2. Arndt J., Greenberg J., Cook A. Mortality salience and the spreading activation of worldview-relevant constructs: Exploring the cognitive architecture of terror management. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 2002, 131:307-324.
3. Dawkins R. Is science a religion? Retrieved from. http://www.thehumanist.org/humanist/articles/dawkins.html.
4. Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science 2012, 336:493-496.
5. Gray J. Heresies: Against progress and other illusions 2004, Granta Books, London, UK.
6. Greenberg J., Pyszczynski T., Solomon S., Simon L., Breus M. Role of consciousness and accessibility of death-related thoughts in mortality salience effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1994, 67:627-637.
7. Greenberg J., Solomon S., Pyszczynski T. Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: Empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. Advances in experimental social psychology 1997, Vol. 29:61-139. Academic Press, New York, NY.
8. Haught J.F. Science and scientism: The importance of a distinction. Zygon 2005, 40:363-368.
9. Heine S.J., Proulx T., Vohs K.D. The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2006, 10:88-110.
10. Hogg M.A., Mulling B. Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. Social identity and social cognition 1999, 249-279. Blackwell, Oxford, UK. D. Abrams, M.A. Hogg (Eds.).
11. Inzlicht M., Tullett A.M., Good M. The need to belief: A neuroscience account of religion as a motivated process. Religion, Brain and Behaviour 2011, 1:192-212.
12. Kay A.C., Whitson J.A., Gaucher D., Galinsky A.D. Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the Heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2009, 18:264-268.
13. Kudielka B.M., Kirschbaum C. Stress and health research. International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences 2001, 15170-15175. Elsevier, Oxford, UK. N.J. Smelser, P.B. Baltes (Eds.).
14. Lerner M., Miller D.T. Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin 1978, 85:1030-1051.
15. Norenzayan A., Hansen I.G. Belief in supernatural agents in the face of death. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2006, 32:174-187.
16. Office of National Statistics Religion in England and Wales 2011 2012, (UK Census release).
17. Paulhus D.L., Carey J.M. The FAD-Plus: Measuring lay beliefs regarding free will and related constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment 2010, 93:96-104.
18. Pinker S. The fear of determinism. Are we free? Psychology and free will 2008, 311-324. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. J. Baer, J.C. Kaufman, R.F. Baumeister (Eds.).
19. Popper K. The open society and its enemies 1945/2003, Vol. II. Routledge, New York, NY.
20. Preston J.L. Religion is the opiate of the masses (but science is the methadone). Religion, Brain and Behaviour 2012, 1:231-233.
21. Preston J., Epley N. Explanations versus applications: The explanatory power of valuable beliefs. Psychological Science 2005, 16:826-832.
22. Preston J., Epley N. Science and God: An automatic opposition between ultimate explanations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2009, 45:238-241.
23. Rogers B. Is nothing sacred? 2004, Routledge, New York, NY.
24. Rosenblatt A., Greenberg J., Solomon S., Pyszczynski T., Lyon D. Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 57:681-690.
25. Rutjens B.T., van der Pligt J., van Harrevald F. Things will get better: The anxiety-buffering qualities of progressive hope. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2009, 35:535-543.
26. Rutjens B.T., van der Pligt J., van Harreveld F. Deus or Darwin: Randomness and belief in theories about the origin of life. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:1078-1080.
27. Rutjens B.T., van Harrevald F., van der Pligt J. Yes we can: Belief in progress as compensatory control. Social Psychological and Personality Science 2010, 1:246-252.
28. Sagan C., Druyan A. The varieties of scientific experience: A personal view of the search for God 2006, Penguin, New York, NY.
29. Sartre J.P. L'existentialisme est un humanisme 1946, Editions Nagel, Paris, France.
30. Shenhav A., Rand D.G., Greene J.D. Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2012, 141:423-428.
31. Sorell T. Scientism: Philosophy and the infatuation with science 1991, Routledge, London, UK.
32. Stenmark M. Scientism: Science, ethics and religion 2001, Ashgate, London, UK.
33. Tracy J.L., Hart J., Martens J.P. Death and science: The existential underpinnings of belief in intelligent design and discomfort with evolution. PLoS One 2011, 6:e17349. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017349.
34. Vail K.E., Arndt J., Abdollahi A. Exploring the existential function of religion and supernatural agent beliefs among Christians, Muslims, Atheists, and Agnostics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2012, 38:1288-1300.
35. Watson D., Clark L.A., Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 54:1063-1070.
36. Ziman J.M. Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science 1978/1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.