Abstracts at congresses of the German Society of Urology: Trends and quality;Beiträge des Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie: Trends und Qualität

Urologe - Ausgabe A

Volumn 52, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1296-1301

  Von Hardenberg, J ^a   Worst, T ^a   Weiss C ^b   Michel, M S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cooperation; German Society of Urology; Publication success; Study design

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GERMANY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; UROLOGY;

CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; GERMANY; JOURNAL IMPACT FACTOR; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; UROLOGY;

EID: 84884702102     PISSN: 03402592     EISSN: 14330563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00120-013-3304-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Albers P, Siener R, Kliesch S et al (2003) Risk factors for relapse in clinical stage I nonseminomatous testicular germ cell tumors: results of the German Testicular Cancer Study Group Trial. J Clin Oncol 21:1505-1512
2. Anheuser P (2011) Auswahlverfahren wissenschaftlicher Beiträge zum DGU-Kongress 2011. Urologe 50:7-8
3. Antes G, Chalmers I (2003) Under-reporting of clinical trials is unethical. Lancet 361:978-979
4. Autorino R, Quarto G, Di Lorenzo G et al (2007) Are abstracts presented at the EAU meeting followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? A critical analysis. Eur Urol 51:833-840
5. Autorino R, Quarto G, Sio MD et al (2006) Fate of abstracts presented at the World Congress of endourology: are they followed by publication in peer-reviewed journals? J Endourol 20:996-1001
6. Chalmers I, Adams M, Dickersin K et al (1990) A cohort study of summary reports of controlled trials. JAMA 263:1401-1405
7. De Sio M, Yakoubi R, De Nunzio C et al (2012) Reporting quality of abstracts presented at the European Association of urology meeting: a critical assessment. J Urol 188:1883-1886
8. Diener MK, Tenckhoff S (2013) Rekrutierende multizentrische chirurgische Studien in Deutschland - Laufende Studien. Chirurg A (Online-Ausgabe Mai 2013)
9. Fink C, Keck T, Rossion I et al (2011) Contribution of the Study Center of the German Surgical Society to evidence based surgery. Chirurg 82:1109-1115
10. Hoag CC, Elterman DS, Macneily AE (2006) Abstracts presented at the American Urological Association Annual Meeting: determinants of subsequent peer reviewed publication. J Urol 176:2624-2629
11. Lehmann J, Retz M, Wiemers C et al (2005) Adjuvant cisplatin plus methotrexate versus methotrexate, vinblastine, epirubicin, and cisplatin in locally advanced bladder cancer: results of a randomized, multicenter, phase III trial (AUO-AB 05/95). J Clin Oncol 23:4963-4974
12. Neudecker J, Diener MK, Schuhmacher C (2013) CHIR-Net: eine Leistungsbilanz. Dtsch Ärztebl B 110:446-448
13. Ng L, Hersey K, Fleshner N (2004) Publication rate of abstracts presented at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association. BJU Int 94:79-81
14. Rao AR, Beatty JD, Laniado M et al (2006) Publication rate of abstracts presented at the British Association of Urological Surgeons Annual Meeting. BJU Int 97:306-309
15. Rexer H (2011) First line therapy for local advanced or metastasized urothelial carcinoma: randomized double-blind phase II study to compare gemcitabin and cisplatin in combination with OGX-427 or placebo for advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (OGX-427- AB 39/11 of the Working Group Urological Oncology). Urologe A 50:1617-1618
16. Saad ED, Mangabeira A, Masson AL et al (2010) The geography of clinical cancer research: analysis of abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology Annual Meetings. Ann Oncol 21:627-632
17. Scherer RW, Langenberg P, Von Elm E (2007) Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts. Cochrane Database Syst Rev MR000005
18. Vena JE, Sultz HA, Carlo GL et al (1987) Sources of bias in retrospective cohort mortality studies: a note on treatment of subjects lost to follow-up. J Occup Med 29:256-261
19. Wahlers BC, Glimm SM (2012) Studienregister der Urologen: Erstes Fachregister in Deutschland mit WHO-Akkreditierung. In: Pressemitteilungen 2012. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Düsseldorf. Online in Internet: URL: http://www.urologenportal.de/pressearchiv20110.html (9.8.2013)
20. Wahlers BC, Glimm SM (2012) Weltweit drittgrößter Urologenkongress endet in Leipzig. In: Pressemitteilungen 2012. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Urologie, Düsseldorf. Online in Internet: URL: http://www.urologenportal.de/pressearchiv20110.html (9.8.2013)