-
1
-
-
34250374457
-
The ups and downs of peer review
-
17562902 10.1152/advan.00104.2006
-
Benos DJ, Bashari E, Chaves JM, Gaggar A, Kapoor N, LaFrance M, et al. The ups and downs of peer review. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007;31:145-152.
-
(2007)
Adv Physiol Educ.
, vol.31
, pp. 145-152
-
-
Benos, D.J.1
Bashari, E.2
Chaves, J.M.3
Gaggar, A.4
Kapoor, N.5
Lafrance, M.6
-
2
-
-
84872075614
-
SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials
-
23295957 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
-
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200-207.
-
(2013)
Ann Intern Med.
, vol.158
, pp. 200-207
-
-
Chan, A.W.1
Tetzlaff, J.M.2
Altman, D.G.3
Laupacis, A.4
Gøtzsche, P.C.5
Krleža-Jerić, K.6
-
3
-
-
18844400653
-
Medical journals start granting CME credit for peer review
-
De Gregory J. Medical journals start granting CME credit for peer review. Science Editor. 2004;27:190-191.
-
(2004)
Science Editor.
, vol.27
, pp. 190-191
-
-
De Gregory, J.1
-
4
-
-
84884704306
-
-
CME in the ERJ Accessed: July 1, 2013
-
European Respiratory Journal. CME in the ERJ. Available at: http://erj.ersjournals.com/site/misc/cmeinfo.xhtml. Accessed: July 1, 2013.
-
European Respiratory Journal
-
-
-
5
-
-
0037149537
-
Peer review unmasked
-
11907547 10.1038/416258a 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XisFSnsbY%3D
-
Gura T. Peer review unmasked. Nature. 2002;416:258-260.
-
(2002)
Nature.
, vol.416
, pp. 258-260
-
-
Gura, T.1
-
6
-
-
0034696320
-
Genetically modified food: Consternation, confusion, and crack-up
-
10772580 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3jtlGntg%3D%3D
-
Horton R. Genetically modified food: consternation, confusion, and crack-up. MJA. 2000;172:148-149.
-
(2000)
MJA.
, vol.172
, pp. 148-149
-
-
Horton, R.1
-
7
-
-
0037024214
-
Effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review
-
12038911 10.1001/jama.287.21.2784
-
Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wagner E, Davidoff F. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2784-2786.
-
(2002)
JAMA
, vol.287
, pp. 2784-2786
-
-
Jefferson, T.1
Alderson, P.2
Wagner, E.3
Davidoff, F.4
-
8
-
-
84876846705
-
Reviewer index: A new proposal of rewarding the reviewer
-
23678247 10.4103/0973-1229.109347
-
Kachewar SG. Sankaye SB. Reviewer index: A new proposal of rewarding the reviewer. Mens Sana Monographs. 2013;11:274-284.
-
(2013)
Mens Sana Monographs.
, vol.11
, pp. 274-284
-
-
Kachewar, S.G.1
Sankaye, S.B.2
-
9
-
-
70749113170
-
The peer reviewer as collaborator's model for publishing
-
10.1087/20100105
-
Kumar MN. The peer reviewer as collaborator's model for publishing. Learned Publishing. 2010;23:17-22.
-
(2010)
Learned Publishing.
, vol.23
, pp. 17-22
-
-
Kumar, M.N.1
-
10
-
-
84857073851
-
Seventh international congress on peer review and biomedical publication - Call for research
-
10.1001/jama.2012.150
-
Rennie D, Flanagin A, Godlee F, Groves T. Seventh international congress on peer review and biomedical publication - call for research. JAMA. 2012;307:726-727.
-
(2012)
JAMA
, vol.307
, pp. 726-727
-
-
Rennie, D.1
Flanagin, A.2
Godlee, F.3
Groves, T.4
-
11
-
-
84870328312
-
Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study
-
10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.014
-
Squazzoni F, Bravo G, Takacs K. Does incentive provision increase the quality of peer review? An experimental study. Research Policy. 2013;42:287-294.
-
(2013)
Research Policy.
, vol.42
, pp. 287-294
-
-
Squazzoni, F.1
Bravo, G.2
Takacs, K.3
-
12
-
-
84884704728
-
-
The JAMA Network. Announcement: CME for peer reviewers
-
The JAMA Network. Announcement: CME for peer reviewers. Arch Neurol. 2009;66:857.
-
(2009)
Arch Neurol
, vol.66
, pp. 857
-
-
|