Erratum: Frequency of debridements and time to heal: A retrospective cohort study of 312 744 wounds (JAMA Dermatology (2013) 149:9 (1050-1058) DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.4960);Frequency of debridements and time to heal: A retrospective cohort study of 312 744 wounds

JAMA Dermatology

Volumn 149, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1050-1058

  Wilcox, James R ^a   Carter, Marissa J ^b   Covington, Scott ^a  

^a Healogics Inc   (United States)

^b Strategic Solutions Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DEBRIDEMENT; DECUBITUS; DIABETIC FOOT; EPITHELIZATION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; GENDER; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LEG ULCER; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT DURATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WOUND ASSESSMENT; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84884689307     PISSN: 21686068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.5358     Document Type: Erratum

References (15)

1. Falanga V. Wound bed preparation and the role of enzymes. Wounds. 2002;14:47-57.
2. Hess CT, Kirsner RS. Orchestrating wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2003;16(5):246-259.
3. Steed DL. Debridement. Am J Surg. 2004;187(5A)(suppl):71S-74S. (Pubitemid 38625991)
4. Ayello EA, Cuddigan JE. Debridement: controlling the necrotic/cellular burden. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2004;17(2):66-78.
5. Attinger CE, Janis JE, Steinberg J, Schwartz J, Al-Attar A, Couch K. Clinical approach to wounds: débridement and wound bed preparation including the use of dressings and wound-healing adjuvants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(7)(suppl):72S-109S. (Pubitemid 44317773)
6. Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Clinical Practice Subcommittee of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society. Conservative Sharp Wound Debridement: Best Practice for Clinicians. Mt Laurel, NJ: Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Society; 2005.
7. Steed DL, Donohoe D, Webster MW, Lindsley L; Diabetic Ulcer Study Group. Effect of extensive debridement and treatment on the healing of diabetic foot ulcers. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183(1):61-64. (Pubitemid 26234895)
8. Saap LJ, Falanga V. Debridement performance index and its correlation with complete closure of diabetic foot ulcers. Wound Repair Regen. 2002;10(6):354-359. (Pubitemid 36025333)
9. Williams D, Enoch S, Miller D, Harris K, Price P, Harding KG. Effect of sharp debridement using curette on recalcitrant nonhealing venous leg ulcers: a concurrently controlled, prospective cohort study. Wound Repair Regen. 2005;13(2):131-137. (Pubitemid 40489862)
10. Cardinal M, Eisenbud DE, Armstrong DG, et al. Serial surgical debridement: a retrospective study on clinical outcomes in chronic lower extremity wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2009;17(3):306-311.
11. Warriner RA III, Wilcox JR, Carter MJ, Stewart DG. More frequent visits to wound care clinics result in faster times to close diabetic foot and venous leg ulcers. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012;25(11):494-501.
12. Granick M, Boykin J, Gamelli R, Schultz G, Tenenhaus M. Toward a common language: surgical wound bed preparation and debridement. Wound Repair Regen. 2006;14(suppl 1):S1-S10. (Pubitemid 44267781)
13. Marston WA, Hanft J, Norwood P, Pollak R; Dermagraft Diabetic Foot Ulcer Study Group. The efficacy and safety of Dermagraft in improving the healing of chronic diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(6):1701-1705. (Pubitemid 36929107)
14. Falanga V, Brem H, Ennis WJ, Wolcott R, Gould LJ, Ayello EA. Maintenance debridement in the treatment of difficult-to-heal chronic wounds. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2008;(suppl):2-15.
15. Armstrong DG, Nguyen HC. Improvement in healing with aggressive edema reduction after debridement of foot infection in persons with diabetes. Arch Surg. 2000;135(12):1405-1409.