Three classes of attitude and their implications for IS research

International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 1728-1744

  Kroenung, Julia ^a   Eckhardt, Andreas ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Affective; Attitude; Attitude Formation; Attitudinal Classes; Behavioral; Cognitive; Scientometrics; Tripartite Model

Indexed keywords

AFFECTIVE; ATTITUDE; ATTITUDE FORMATION; ATTITUDINAL CLASSES; BEHAVIORAL; COGNITIVE; SCIENTOMETRICS;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84884627769     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (52)

1. Ajzen, I. 1991. "The theory of planned behavior", Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, (50: 2), pp. 179-211.
2. Ajzen, I. 2001. "Nature and operation of attitudes", Annual Review ofPsychology, 52, pp.27-58.
3. Al-Khaldi, M. and Wallace, R.S. 1999. "The influence of attitudes on personal computer utilization among knowledge workers: the case of Saudi Arabia", Information and Management, (36), pp. 185-204.
4. Albarracin, D., Zanna, M., Johnson, B. and Tarcan Kumkale, G. 2005. "Attitudes: Introduction and Scope", in D. Albarracin, B. Johnson and M. Zanna (Eds.) Handbook of Attitudes. New York, London: Psychology Press, pp. 1-20.
5. Allport, G.W. 1935. "Attitudes", in Handbook of social psychology, C. Murchison (Ed.), Worcester: Clark University Press, pp. 798-844.
6. Bagozzi, R.P., Tybout, M., Craig, S. and Sternthal, B. 1979. "The Construct Validity of the Tripartite Classification of Attitudes" Journal of Marketing Research, (16:1), pp. 88-95.
7. Beaudry, A. and Pinsonneault, A. 2010. "The Other Side of Acceptance: Studying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Emotions on Information Technology Use", MIS Quarterly, (34:4), pp. 689-710.
8. Bem, D.J. 1972. "Self-perception theory", in: L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6), San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 1-62.
9. Benbasat, I. and Zmud, R. 2003. "The identity crisis within the IS discipline: Defining and communicating the disciplines core properties", MIS Quarterly, (27:2), pp. 183-194.
10. Bhattacherjee, A. and Premkumar, G. 2004. "Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test", MIS Quarterly, (28:2), pp. 229-254.
11. Bohner, G. and Dickel, N. 2011. "Attitudes and Attitude Change", Annual Review ofPsychology, 62, pp. 121.
12. Breckler, S.J. 1984. "Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (47), pp. 1191-1205.
13. Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A. and Huff, S. 1999. "Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study", MIS Quarterly, (23:2), pp. 145-158.
14. Crano, W. and Prislin, R. 2006. "Attitudes and Persuasion", Annual Review of Psychology, (57), pp. 345-374.
15. Crano, W. and Prislin R. 2008. Attitudes and Attitude Change. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 1-15.
16. Davis, F. D., A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results, Doctoral dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1986.
17. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of two Theoretical Models", Management Science, (35:8), pp. 982-1003.
18. Dennis, A. and Garfield, M. 2003. "The Adoption and Use of GSS in Project Teams: Toward More Participative Processes and Outcomes", MIS Quarterly, (27:2), pp. 289-323.
19. Doll, W. and Torkzadeh, G. 1991. "The Measurement of End User Computing Satisfaction: Theoretical and Methodological Issues", MIS Quarterly, (15:1), pp. 5-10.
20. Eagly, A. and Chaiken, S. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes, Belmont USA: Wadsworth.
21. Eagly, A. and Chaiken, S. 2007. "The Advantages of an Inclusive Definition of Attitude", Social Cognition, (25:5), pp. 582-602.
22. Fazio, R.H. 1995. "Attitudes as object evaluation associations: Determinants, consequences, and correlates of attitude accessibility", in Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences R.E. Petty and J.A. Krosnick (eds.) Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. pp. 247-282.
23. Fazio, R.H. and Petty, R. 2008. Attitudes their structure function, and consequences. New York, Psychology Press.
24. Festinger, L. 1957. A theory ofcognitive dissonance.Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
25. Fishbein, M. 1963. "An investigation of the relationship between beliefs about and object and the attitude toward that object", Human Relations, 16, pp. 233-240.
26. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, L. 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison, Wesley.
27. Glasman, L. and Albarracin, D. 2006. "Forming Attitudes that Predict Future Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Attitude-Behavior Relation", Psychological Bulletin, (132:5), pp.778-822.
28. Ha, I., Yoon, Y. and Choi, M. 2007. "Determinants of adoption of mobile games under mobile broadband wireless access environment", Information & Management, 44, pp. 276-286.
29. Hunter, J. E., Schmidt, F. L., and Jackson, G. B. 1982. Meta Analysis: Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
30. Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J.W. and Lacity, M. 2006. "A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research", Journal of Information Technology, (21), pp. 1-23.
31. Lewis, Bruce R.; Templeton, Gary F.; and Luo, Xin 2007. "A Scientometric Investigation into the Validity of IS Journal Quality Measures", Journal of the Association for Information Systems, (8:12), Article 35.
32. Leydesdorff, L. 2001 "The challenge of scientometrics" Boca Raton, FL: Universal Publishers.
33. Lowry, P. B., Romans, D. and Curtis, A. 2004. Global Journal Prestige and Supporting Disciplines: A Scientometric Study of Information Systems Journals." Journal ofthe Association forInformation Systems, (5:2), pp. 29-76.
34. McGuire, W.J. 1969. "The nature of attitudes and attitude change," in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.) Handbook of social psychology. 2nd Edition, MA: Addison, Wesley, pp. 136-314.
35. McGuire, W.J. 1985. "Attitudes and attitude change," in G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.) Handbook of SocialPsychology, 3rd Edition, NewYork: Random House, pp. 233-346.
36. Ortiz de Guinea, A. and Markus, M. 2009. "Why break the Habit of Lifetime? Rethinking the Roles of Intention, Habit, and Emotion in Continuing Information Technology Use", MIS Quarterly, (33:3), pp. 433-444.
37. Peffers, K. and Tang, Y. 2003. Identifying and Evaluating the Universe of Outlets for Information Systems Research: Ranking the Journals", Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, (5:1), pp. 63-84.
38. Saunders, C., Avison, D., Davis, G., Eindor, P., Galetta, D., Hirschheim, R. and Straub, D. 2006. AIS Senior Scholars Forum Subcommittee on Journals. http://home.aisnet.org/associations/7499/files/Senior%20Scholars%20Letter.pdf. Accessed 30.04.2011. pp. 1-2.
39. Straub, D. 2006. "The Value of Scientometric Studies: An Introduction to a Debate on IS as a Reference Discipline", Journal ofthe AssociationforInformation Systems, (7:5), pp. 241-246.
40. Taylor, S. and Todd, P.A. 1995. "Understanding information Technology Usage: A test of Competing Models", Information Systems Research, (6:4), pp. 144-176.
41. Thompson, R.L., Higgins, C.A. and Howell, J.M. 1991. "Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization", MIS Quarterly, (15:1), pp. 124-143.
42. Triandis, H.C. 1971. Attitude and Attitude Change. NewYork: Wiley.
43. Van der Heijden, H. 2004. "User acceptance of hedonic information systems", MIS Quarterly, (28:4), pp. 695-704.
44. Venkatesh, V. and Brown, S. 2001. "A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges", MIS Quarterly, (25:1), pp. 71-102.
45. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies", Management Science, (46: 2), pp.186-204.
46. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G. and Davis, F. 2003. "User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view", MIS Quarterly, (27:3), pp. 425-478.
47. Williams, M. D., Y. K. Dwivedi, B. Lal and A. Schwarz 2009. "Contemporary Trends and Issues in IS adoption and Diffusion Research", Journal ofInformation Technology, (24:1), pp. 1-10.
48. Yang, H. and Yoo, Y. 2004. "It's all about attitude: revisiting the technology acceptance model", Decision Support Systems, (38), pp. 19-31.
49. Zajonc, R.B. 1984. "On the primacy of affect", American Psychologist, 39,117-123
50. Zanna M.P. and Rempel, J.K. 1988. " A new look at an old concept", in D. Bar-Tal and A.W. Kruglanski (Eds.) The social psychology of knowledge, Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 315-334.
51. Zanna, M.P. and Rempel, J.K. 2008. "Attitudes: A new lokk at an old concept", in: Attitudes their structure function, and consequences R.H. Fazio and R. Petty (Eds.) New York: Psychology Press, pp. 7-16.
52. Zhang, P., Aikman, S. and Sun, H. 2008. "Two Types of Attitudes in ICT Acceptance and Use", International Journal of Human-ComputerInteraction, (24:7), pp.628-648.