The roles of agency and artifacts in assembling open data complementarities

International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 905-920

  Kuk, George ^a   Davies, Tim ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Artifacts; Complementarities; Materiality; Open data; Performativity

Indexed keywords

ARTIFACTS; COMPLEMENTARITIES; MATERIALITY; OPEN DATUM; PERFORMATIVITY;

DIGITAL STORAGE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INNOVATION; PERSONAL COMPUTING;

DATA HANDLING;

EID: 84884624897     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (44)

1. Alspaugh, T. A., Scacchi, W., and Asuncion, H. U. Software Licenses in Context: The Challenge of Heterogeneously-Licensed Systems, Journal of the Association for Information Systems (11:11), 2010, pp.730-755.
2. Boland, L., and Coleman, E. 2008. New Development: What Lies Beyond Service Delivery? Leadership Behaviours for Place Shaping Local Government, Public Money and Management (28:5), pp. 313-318.
3. Borg, S. 2001. "The Research Journal: A Tool for Promoting and Understanding Researcher Development," Language Teaching Research, pp. 156-177.
4. Bowker, G. C. 2000. "Biodiversity Datadiversity," Social Studies of Science (30:5), pp. 643-683.
5. Brewer, J., and Hunter, A. 2006. Foundations of Multimethod Research, Sage.
6. Bryman, Alan. 2008. Social Research Methods. 3rd ed. OUP Oxford.
7. Cooper, R., and Haltiwanger, J. 1996. "Evidence on Macroeconomic Complementarities", The Review of Economics and Statistics (78:1), pp. 78-93.
8. Dekkers, M. et al. 2006. "MEPSIR - Measuring European Public Sector Information Resources", http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/actions_eu/policy_actions/mepsir/index_en.htm [Accessed December 21, 2009].
9. Didier, E. 2007. Do Statistics Perform the Economy? in Do Economists Make Markets? in D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu (eds), Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 276-310.
10. Faulkner, P., and Runde, J. 2009. On the Identity of Technological Objects and User Innovations in Function, Academy of Management Review (34:3), pp. 442-462.
11. Fink, A. 2006. Howto conduct surveys□: a step-by-step guide. 3rd ed. Thousand OaksD; London: Sage.
12. Gao, L. S., and Iyer, B. 2006. Analyzing Complementarities Using Software Stacks for Software Industry Acquisitions, Journal ofManagementlnformation Systems (23:2), pp. 119-147.
13. Gray, D. E. 2009. Doing Research in the Real World. Sage Publications Ltd.
14. Gregor, S., and Jones, D. 2007. The Anatomy of a Design Theory, Journal of the Association for Information Systems (8:5), pp. 312-335.
15. Hevner, R., March, S., Park, J., and Ram, S. 2004. Design Science in Information Systems Research, MIS Quarterly (28:1), pp.75-105.
16. Hogge, B. 2010. "Open Data Study, commissioned by the Transparency and Accountability Initiative", http://www.soros.org/initiatives/information/focus/communication/articles_publications/publications/open-data-study-20100519.
17. Huang, J., Thornton, K. M., and Efthimaiadis, E. N. 2010. "Conversational Tagging in Twitter," Proceedings Hypertext (HT'10), June 13-16, Toronto, Canada.
18. Huberman, A. M, and M. B Miles. 2002. The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. Sage Publications, Inc.
19. Janesick, Valerie J. 1999. "A Journal About Journal Writing as a Qualitative Research Technique: History, Issues, and Reflections," Qualitativelnquiry (5:1), pp. 505-524.
20. Jones, M. R. 1998. "Information Systems and the Double Mangle: Steering a Course between the Scylla of Embedded Structure and the Charybidis of Strong Symmetry," Proceedings of the IFIP WG 8.2 and 8.6 Joint Working Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 287-302.
21. Kuechler, B., and Vaishnavi, V. 2008. On Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project,' European Journal ofInformation Systems (17), pp. 489-504.
22. Kuk, G. 2006. Strategic interaction and knowledge sharing in the KDE developer mailing list, Management Science (52:7), pp. 1031-1042.
23. Lakhani, K. R, and Wolf, R. G. 2003. MIT Sloan School of Management Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation Effort in Free / Open Source Software Projects, http://ssrn.com/paper=443040.
24. Lanzara, G. F., and Morner, M. 2003. The Knowledge Ecology of Open Source Software Projects, 19th EGOS Colloquium.
25. Latour, B. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Leonardi, P. M. 2010. When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordances, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material agencies, MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp.147-167.
27. Leonardi, P.M. 2010. "Digital materiality? How artifacts without matter, matter," First Monday (15:6).
28. MacKenzie, D. 2007. 'Is economics performative? Option theory and the construction of derivatives markets' in Do Economists Make Markets? D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu (eds), Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 54-86.
29. Markus, M. L. and Silver, M. S. 2008. "A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit," Journal of the Association for Information Systems (9:10), pp. 609-632.
30. Mayo, E., and Steinberg, T. 2007. Power of Information Taskforce Report, http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/reports/power_of_information.aspx.
31. Michel, S., Brown, S. W., and Gallen, A. S. 2008.An Expanded and2010 Strategic View of Discontinuous Innovations: Deploying a Service-Dominant Logic, Journal of Academy of Marketing Science (35), pp. 54-66.
32. Mutch, A. 2010. Technology, Organization and Structure: A Morphogenetic Approach, Organization Science (21:2), pp. 507-520.
33. Open Knowledge Foundation. 2006. "Open Knowledge Definition", http://www.opendefinition.org/.
34. Orlikowski, W. J. 2006. Material Knowing: The Scaffolding of Human Knowledgeability, European Journal ofInformation Systems (15), pp. 249-273.
35. Orlikowski, W. J., and Scott, S. V. 2008. Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization, The Academy of Management Annals (2:1), pp. 433-474.
36. Pickering, A. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science, Chicago: The University of Chicago.
37. Rivadeneira, A. W., Gruen, D. M., Muller, M. J., and Millen, D. R. 2007. "Getting Our Head in the Clouds: Toward Evaluation Studies ofTagclouds," CHIProceedings, San Jose, USA.
38. Robey, D., and Boudreau, M. 1999. "Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications," Information Systems Research (10:2), pp. 167-185.
39. Suddaby, R. 2006. From the Editors: What Grounded Theory is Not, Academy of Management Journal (49:4), pp. 633-642.
40. Tanriverdi, H., and Venkatraman, N. 2005. Knowledge Relatedness and the Performance of Multibusiness Firms, Strategic Management Journal (26:2), pp. 97-119.
41. Vargo, S. L., and Lusch, R. F. 2004. Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing, Journal of Marketing (68:Jan), pp. 1-17.
42. Volkoff, O., Strong, D. M., and Elmes, M. B. 2007. Technological Embeddedness and Organizational Change, Organization Science (18:5), pp. 832-848.
43. Von Krogh, G., and von Hippel, E. 2006. The Promise of Research on Open Source Software, Management Science (52:7), pp. 975-983.
44. Yin, R. K. 2003. CaseStudy Research: Design and Method, 2ed., London: Sage.