Subjective social status and substance use severity in a young adult sample

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 901-908

  Finch, Karen A ^a   Ramo, Danielle E ^a   Delucchi, Kevin L ^a   Liu, Howard ^a   Prochaska, Judith J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Smokers; Socioeconomic status; Subjective social status; Substance use; Young adults

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; CANNABIS;

ADULT; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ARTICLE; CANNABIS SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT STATUS; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCOME; MALE; PARTTIME EMPLOYMENT; SMOKING; SOCIAL STATUS; UNITED STATES;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALCOHOL DRINKING; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MARIJUANA SMOKING; SELF CONCEPT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SMOKING; SOCIAL CLASS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84884618622     PISSN: 0893164X     EISSN: 19391501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0032900     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adamson, S. J., Kay-Lambkin, F. J., Baker, A. L., Lewin, T. J., Thornton, L., Kelly, B. J., & Sellman, J. D. (2010). An improved brief measure of cannabis misuse: The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R). Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 110, 137-143. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep. 2010.02.017
2. Adamson, S. J., & Sellman, J. D. (2003). A prototype screening instrument for cannabis use disorder: The Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) in an alcohol-dependent clinical sample. Drug and Alcohol Review, 22, 309-315. doi:10.1080/0959523031000154454
3. Adler, N. E. (2000). MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status [Measure]. San Francisco, CA: MacArthur Research Network on Socioeconomic Status and Health. Retrieved from http://www.macses.ucsf.edu/research/psychosocial/ subjective.php
4. Alamar, B., & Glantz, S. (2006). Effect of increased social unacceptability of cigarette smoking on reduction in cigarette consumption. American Journal of Public Health, 96, 1359-1363. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.069617
5. Ali, M. M., & Dwyer, D. S. (2010). Social network effects in alcohol consumption among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 35, 337-342. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2009.12.002
6. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step program. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
7. Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469-480. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.5.469
8. Arnett, J. J. (2005). The developmental context of substance use in emerging adulthood. Journal of Drug Issues, 35, 235-254. doi:10.1177/ 002204260503500202
9. Balsa, A. I., Homer, J. F., French, M. T., & Norton, E. C. (2011). Alcohol use and popularity: Social payoffs from conforming to peers' behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 559-568. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2010. 00704.x
10. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
11. Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2001). Peer influences on college drinking: A review of the research. Journal of Substance Abuse, 13, 391-424. doi:10.1016/S0899-3289(01)00098-0
12. Brown, R. A., Burgess, E. S., Sales, S. D., Whiteley, J. A., Evans, D. M., & Miller, I. W. (1998). Reliability and validity of a smoking timeline follow-back interview. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 12, 101-112. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.12.2.101
13. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Collins, R. L., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 189-200. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.53.2.189
15. Coronges, K., Stacy, A. W., & Valente, T. W. (2011). Social network influences of alcohol and marijuana cognitive associations. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 1305-1308. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.07.008
16. Finkelstein, D. M., Kubzansky, L. D., & Goodman, E. (2006). Social status, stress, and adolescent smoking. Journal of Adolescent Health, 39, 678-685. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.04.011
17. Goodman, E., Adler, N. E., Kawachi, I., Frazier, A. L., Huang, B., & Colditz, G. A. (2001). Adolescents' perceptions of social status: Devel-opment and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108(2), e31. doi:10.1542/peds. 108.2.e31
18. Goodman, E., Huang, B., Schafer-Kalkhoff, T., & Adler, N. E. (2007). Perceived socioeconomic status: A new type of identity that influences adolescents' self-rated health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 479-487. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.05.020
19. Goodman, E., McEwen, B. S., Dolan, L. M., Schafer-Kalkhoff, T., & Adler, N. E. (2005). Social disadvantage and adolescent stress. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 484-492. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.11.126
20. Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., Rickert, W., & Robinson, J. (1989). Measuring the heaviness of smoking: Using selfreported time to the first cigarette of the day and number of cigarettes smoked per day. British Journal of Addiction, 84, 791-800. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1989. tb03059.x
21. Hu, L-T., & Bentler, P M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
22. Johnston, L D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2011). Monitoring the Future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2010. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
23. Lynch, J. W., Kaplan, G. A., & Salonen, J. T. (1997). Why do poor people behave poorly?. Variation in adult health behaviours and psychosocial characteristics by stages of the socioeconomic lifecourse. Social Science & Medicine, 44, 809-819. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00191-8
24. Marmot, M. (2005). Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet, 365, 1099-1104. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71146-6
25. Muthén, B. O., & Muthén, L. K. (2010). MPlus 6 [software]. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
26. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998 -2006). MPlus user's guide (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
27. Patrick, M. E., Wightman, P., Schoeni, R. F., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2012). Socioeconomic status and substance use among young adults: A comparison across constructs and drugs. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 73, 772-782. Retrieved from http://www.jsad.com/
28. Payne, T. J., Smith, P. O., McCracken, L. M., McSherry, W. C., & Antony, M. M. (1994). Assessing nicotine dependence: A comparison of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire (FTQ) with the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND) in a clinical sample. Addictive Behaviors, 19, 307-317. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(94)90032-9
29. Ramo, D. E., Delucchi, K., Hall, S., Liu, H., & Prochaska, J. J. (2012). Marijuana and tobacco co-use in young adults: Patterns use and thoughts about use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 74, 301-310.
30. Ramo, D. E., Hall, S. M., & Prochaska, J. J. (2010). Reaching young adult smokers through the Internet: Comparison of three recruitment mechanisms. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 12, 768-775. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq086
31. Ramo, D. E., Hall, S. M., & Prochaska, J. J. (2011). Reliability and validity of self-reported smoking in an anonymous online survey with young adults. Health Psychology, 30, 693-701. doi:10.1037/a0023443
32. Ramo, D. E., Liu, H., & Prochaska, J. J. (2011). Reliability and validity of young adults' anonymous online reports of marijuana use and thoughts about use. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, 801- 811. doi: 10.1037/a0026201
33. Ramo, D. E., & Prochaska, J. J. (2012). Broad reach and targeted recruitment using Facebook for an online survey of young adults substance use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, e28.
34. Redonnet, B., Chollet, A., Fombonne, E., Bowes, L., & Melchior, M. (2012). Tobacco, alcohol, cannabis and other illegal drug use among young adults: The socioeconomic context. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 121, 231-239. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.09.002
35. Richter, M., Vereecken, C. A., Boyce, W., Gabhainn, S. N., & Currie, C. E. (2009). Parental occupation, family affluence and adolescent health behaviour in 28 countries. International Journal of Public Health, 54, 203-212. doi:10.1007/s00038-009-8018-4
36. Singh-Manoux, A., Adler, N. E., & Marmot, M. G. (2003). Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Social Science & Medicine, 56, 1321-1333. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00131-4
37. Singh-Manoux, A., Marmot, M. G., & Adler, N. E. (2005). Does subjective social status predict health and change in health status better than objective status?. Psychosomatic Medicine, 67, 855-861. doi:10.1097/01.psy. 0000188434.52941.a0
38. Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1996). Timeline followback: A calendar method for assessing alcohol and drug use. Toronto, Canada: Addiction Research Foundation.
39. Sobell, L. C., Sobell, M. B., Leo, G. I., & Cancilla, A. (1988). Reliability of a timeline method: Assessing normal drinkers' reports of recent drinking and a comparative evaluation across several populations. British Journal of Addiction, 83, 393-402. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.198.tb00485.x
40. Stringhini, S., Sabia, S., Shipley, M., Brunner, E., Nabi, H., Kivimaki, M., & Singh-Manoux, A. (2010). Association of socioeconomic position with health behaviors and mortality. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 303, 1159-1166. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.297
41. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Office of Applied Studies. (2008). Results from the 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National findings. DHHS Publication No. SMA 08-4343. Rockville, MD.