Technology appropriation in face-to-face collaborative learning

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 213, Issue , 2006, Pages 89-96

  Overdijk, Maarten ^a   Van Diggelen, Wouter ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Collaborative learning; Discussion support; Face to face discussions; Technology appropriation

Indexed keywords

COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING; DISCUSSION SUPPORT; FACE-TO-FACE DISCUSSIONS; PROBLEM ANALYSIS; SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONS; STUDENT GROUPS; TECHNOLOGY APPROPRIATIONS;

STUDENTS; TECHNOLOGY;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84884614719     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Bakthin, M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.
2. Bannon, (1997). Activity theory. Retrieved from: http://www.sv.cict.fr/ cotcos/pjs/TheoreticalApproaches/Actvity/ActivitypaperBannon.htm
3. Carroll, J., Howard, S., Vetere, F., Peck, J. and Murphy, J. (2002). Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people. Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
4. Contractor and Seibold (1993). Contractor, N.S. and Seibold, D.R. (1993). Theoretical framework for the study of structuring processes in Group Decision Support Systems: Adaptive Structuration Theory and Self-Organizing Theory. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 528-563.
5. DeSanctis, G. and Poole, M.S. (1994). Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory. Organizational Science, 5(2), 121-147.
6. Gibson, J.J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, Texts and Affordances. Sociology, 35 (2).
8. Kirschner, P.A. (2002). Three Worlds of CSCL: Can we Support CSCL? Heerlen: Open University of the Netherlands.
9. Mackay, H. & Gillespie, G (1992) Extending the Social Shaping of Technology Approach: Ideology and Appropriation. Social Studies of Science, 22(4).
10. Ollman, (1971). Alienation: Marx's conception of man in capitalist society. Cambridge University Press.
11. Overdijk, M. & Van Diggelen, W. (submitted 2006). Making sense of tools and artifacts: the student-tool connection. Submitted to: International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.
12. Palincsar, A.S. (1998). Social Constructivist Perspectives on Teaching and Learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375.
13. Rogoff, B. (1995). In J. V. Wertsch, P. d. Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 56-74). New York: Cambridge.
14. Tyran, C.K. & Shepherd, M. (2001). Collaborative Technology in the Classroom: A Review of the GSS Research and a Research Framework. Information Technology and Management, 2, 395-418.
15. Van Diggelen, W. & Overdijk, M. (2006). Network computing support for face-to-face collaborative learning. Proceedings of the EC-tel conference, Crete 2006.
16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Weick, K.E. (1995). Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage: Thousand Oaks, California.
18. Wertsch, J.V. (1998). Mind as action. Oxford University Press.
19. Woods, D.D. (1998). Designs are hypothesis about how artefacts shape cognition and collaboration. Ergonomics. 41: 2, 168-173.