Why are you sharing others' tweets?: The impact of argument quality and source credibility on information sharing behavior

International Conference on Information Systems 2011, ICIS 2011

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 1186-1195

  Ha, Sangwook ^a   Ahn, Joongho ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Information diffusion; Information sharing; Social networking service; Twitter

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENT QUALITIES; DUAL-PROCESS THEORIES; INFORMATION DIFFUSION; INFORMATION SHARING; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; SOCIAL NETWORKING SERVICES; SOURCE CREDIBILITIES; TWITTER;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

EID: 84884600327     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (48)

1. Ajzen, I. 2002. "Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior", Journal of Applied Social Psychology (32:4), pp. 665-683.
2. Bailey, J. E., and Pearson, S. W. 1983. "Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction," Management Science (29:5), pp. 530-545.
3. Bandura, A. 1977. "Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change" Psychological Review (84:2), pp. 191-215.
4. Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: the exercise of control, W. H. Freeman.
5. Beuningen, J., Ruyter, K., Wetzels, M., and Streukens, S. 2009. "Customer Self-Efficacy in Technology- Based Self-Service." Journal of Service Research (11:4), pp. 407-428.
6. Birdsell, D. S., and Groarke, L. 1996. "Toward a Theory of Visual Argument.", Argumentation and Advocacy (33:1), pp. 1-10.
7. Bock, G.-W., lmud, R. W., Kim, Y.-G., and Lee, J.-N. 2005. "Behavioral Intention Formation in Knowledge Sharing: Examining the Roles of Extrinsic Motivators, Social-Psychological Forces, and Organizational Climate," MIS Quarterly (29:1), pp. 87-111.
8. Bohner, G., Chaiken, S., and Hunyadi, P. 1994. "The role of mood and message ambiguity in the interplay of heuristic and systematic processing," European Journal of Social Psychology (24:1), pp. 207-221.
9. Boyd, D. M., and Ellison, N. B. 2008. "Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (13:1), pp. 210-230.
10. Boyd, D., Golder, S., and Lotan, G. 2010. "Tweet, Tweet, Retweet: Conversational Aspects of Retweeting on Twitter", In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society, pp. 1-10.
11. Brooks, A., and Churchill, E. 2010. "Tune in, Tweet on, Twit out: Information Snacking on Twitter," CHI 2010 Workshop on Microblogging.
12. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Stoltenberg, C. D. 1985. "Processes of social influence: The Elaboration Likelihood model of persuasion", In: Advances in cognitive-behavioral research and therapy, P. C. Kendall (ed.), Academic Press, pp. 215-274.
13. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F., and Gummadi, K. 2010. "Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy", In Fourth International AAAI Conference on Webloqs and Social Media (ICWSM).
14. Chaiken, S. 1980. "Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (39:5), pp. 752-766.
15. Chin, W. W., 2000. Frequently Asked Questions: Partial Least Squares & PLS-Graph. Home Page. [On-line]. Available: http:ffdisc-nt.cba.uh.edufchinfplsfaq.htm
16. Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L. and Newsted, P.R. 2003. A Partial Least Squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic mail adoption study, Information Systems Research (14:2), pp. 189-217.
17. Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., and Wang, E. T. G. 2006. "Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories", Decision Support Systems (42:3), pp. 1872-1888.
18. Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. 1995. "Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test", MIS Quarterly (19:2), pp. 189-211.
19. Constant, D., Kiesler, S., and Sproull, L. 1994. "What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing", Information Systems Research (5:4), pp. 400-421.
20. Dauber, C. 2001. "Image as Argument: The Impact of Mogadishu on U.S. Military Intervention", Armed Forces&Society (27:2), pp. 205-229.
21. Davis, F. D. 1989. "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology", MIS Quarterly (13:3), pp. 319-340.
22. Fornell, C., and Bookstein, F. L. 1982. "Two Structural Equation Models: LISREL and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory," Journal of Marketing Research (19:4), pp. 440-452.
23. Fornell, C., Lorange, P., and Roos, J. 1990. "The Cooperative Venture Formation Process: A Latent Variable Structural Modeling Approach," Management Science (36:10), pp. 1246-1255.
24. Gefen, D., Straub, D., and Boudreau, M.-C. 2000. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice, Communications of theAssociationfor Information Systems (4:1).
25. Hsu, M.-H., Ju, T. L., Yen, C.-H., and Chang, C.-M. 2007. "Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities: The relationship between trust, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (65:2), pp. 153-169.
26. Huberman, B. A., Romero, D. M. and Wu, F. 2009. Social Networks that Matter: Twitter under the Microscope, First Monday, Vol. 14, No. 1-5.
27. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T., and Tseng, B. 2007. "Why we twitter: understanding microblogging usage and communities", Proceedings of the 9th WebKDD and 1st SNA-KDD 2007 workshop on Web mining and social network analysis WebKDDfSNA-KDD '07, pp. 56-65.
28. Jarvenpaa, S. L., and Staples, D. S. 2000. "The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants," The Journal of Strategic information Systems (9:2-3), pp. 129-154.
29. Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B. C. Y., and Wei, K.-K. 2005. "Contributing Knowledge to Electronic Knowledge Repositories: An Empirical Investigation", MiS Quarterly (29:1), pp. 113-143.
30. Keil, M., Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K.-K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V., and Wassenaar, A., 2000. "A Cross- Cultural Study on Escalation of Commitment Behavior in Sof tware Projects", MiS Quarterly (24:2), pp. 299-325.
31. Kelley, H. H., and Thibaut, J. W. 1978. Interpersonal relations: a theory of interdependence, Wiley.
32. Kraemer, K. L., Danziger, J. N., Dunkle, D. E., and King, J. L. 1993. "The Usefulness of Computer-Based Information to Public Managers," MiS Quarterly (17:2), pp. 129-148.
33. Krishnamurthy, B., Gill, P., and Arlitt, M. 2008. "A few chirps about twitter", Proceedings of thefirst workshop on Online social networks, WOSP '08, pp. 19-24.
34. Kolekof ski, K. E., and Heminger, A. R. 2003. "Beliefs and attitudes affecting intentions to share information in an organizational setting", information & Management (40:6), pp. 521-532.
35. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., and Moon, S. 2010. "What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?" Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web WWW'10, pp. 591-600.
36. Lampe, C., Ellison, N. B., and Steinfield, C. 2008. "Changes in use and perception of Facebook", In Proceedings of the 2008. ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work CSCW '08 New Fork, NY, USA: ACM, pp. 721-730.
37. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. 1986. "The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion", In:.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, L. Berkowitz (ed.), Academic Press, pp. 123-205.
38. Recuero, R., Araujo, R., lago, G., 2011. "How does Social Capital affect Retweets?", in fifth international AAAi Conference on Web logs and Social Media (iCWSM).
39. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., and Will, A. 2005. Smart PLS 2.0 (beta), Hamburg, Germany: University of Hamburg.
40. Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of innovations, The Free Press. NewYork.
41. Sussman, S. W. and Siegal, W. S. 2003. "Informational Influence in Organizations: An Integrated Approach to Knowledge Adoption", information Systems Pesearch (14:1), pp. 47-65.
42. Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L., and Walther, J. B. 2008. "Too Much of a Good Thing? The Relationship between Number of Friends and Interpersonal Impressions on Facebook", Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication (13:3), pp. 531-549.
43. Walker, G. B., and Bender, M. A. 1994. "Is It More than Rock and Roll?: Considering Music Video as Argument.",.Argumentation andAdvocacy (31:2), pp. 64-79.
44. Walther, J. B. 1992. "Interpersonal Effects in Computer-Mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective," Communication Pesearch (19:1), pp. 52-90.
45. Walther, J. B., and D'Addario, K. P. 2001. "The Impacts of Emoticons on Message Interpretation in Computer-Mediated Communication," Social Science Computer Peview (19:3), pp. 324-347.
46. Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., and Klein, D. J. 1994. "Effects of mood on high elaboration attitude change: The mediating role of likelihood judgments," European Journal of Social Psychology (24:1), pp. 25-43.
47. Zhang, W., and Watts, S. 2003. "Knowledge Adoption in Online Communities of Practice", iCiS 2003 Proceedings.
48. Zhang, W., and Watts, S. 2008. "Capitalizing on Content: Information Adoption in Two Online communities", Journal of theAssociationforinformation Systems (9:2).